preview

Jonestown Cult Analysis

Decent Essays

Over nine hundred people dead within five minutes and all done by one all-powerful cult leader. Unfortunately, that was the case for the members of Jim Jones's cult of Jonestown. Jonestown is a prime example of how a religious movement can turn into a cult in the matter of time, and how it can be difficult to protect people against. This is due in part to our general acceptance of most religious movements in accordance to the first amendment, but also due in our classification of what a cult is. "Cults" are just destructive religious movements and are still protected by the first amendment. But one can't help but wonder how many cults are getting away with doing terrible things under the guise of religious choice. It's hard to admit that there's …show more content…

However, the reason why we shouldn't allow a clause to protect individuals from religions is fairly complex, but crucial to understanding why just adding new qualifiers isn't necessary. Within the 1st amendment there is the freedom of religion, but within that comes two very important clauses - the Establishment Clause and the Free-exercise Clause. They are written as follows: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" ("The Constitution of the United States," Amendment 1). The words in the amendment are indicative of the clause. The establishment clause already puts a careful line on how much government interference there is with religious establishments, however the free-exercise clause is critically important when discussion religious scrutiny in this paper. The law is absolute that congress can make no law prohibiting the free exercise of religion, however, this is often not followed. In Employment Division vs Smith (1990), it was decided that a government entity had to prove it had compelling interest if the generally applicable law infringed on religious beliefs, and that careful scrutiny would be made if fundamental rights were at stake. Often, this was wishy washy and especially hard to do when religious freedom cases can vary from things like religious beliefs interfering with work or animal ritual sacrifice, one issue having a clearer moral quandary than the other. It is important to consider that the element of "compelling interest" already does what a protection against cults would do, and although it is often in flux, it has done its job without putting any lives in

Get Access