Juvenile Offenders In Australia

The juvenile justice system in Australia dates back to the late 1700’s. The Australian justice system was adopted from the British Parliament when the British began to settle in their territory. During the beginning of the 1800’s children were treated as an equal to adult offender. There were no laws separating the wellbeing of a juvenile delinquent versus an adult offender. It wasn’t until the mid-1800’s that the Australian criminal justice system decided to separate juvenile offenders from adult

The way the courts deal with juvenile delinquents varies depending on the country. Even the age of criminal responsibility is different depending on the country. Most people think when you become 18 you are no longer a minor and can be charged as an adult, well in Japan until you are 20 you can still be charged as a minor. In germany they consider 21 a legal adult .On the other hand when you become 17 in Australia you are charged as an adult. They way they treat juveniles in prison also differs. The

The way in which juvenile delinquents are dealt with by the courts varies depending on the country. For example, the age of criminal responsibility is different depending on the country. Most people think when you reach the age of 18 you are no longer a minor and can be charged as an adult; however, in Japan you can be charged as a minor until the age of 20. In Germany, they consider a person who is 21 or above a legal adult. On the other hand, at the age of 17 in Australia you are charged as an

Analysis of Findings Question 1: What is the nature of youth crime in Australia? Youth crime is the crime committed by juvenile offenders. It is the common issue in Australia. The age group between 14-19 years old is the popular group of youth crime. (News 2013) Different age groups commit different types of crimes. (The youth court 2009) Also, there are many kinds of crime and crime method in the society, such as, drug offences, robbery, burglary, assault and violent offenses. The group of people

Young people represent the future of society. Consequently, they deserve respect and support while they develop in order to maintain a fair and just society. Therefore, it is the juvenile justice system’s responsibility to establish institutions and legislation to protect the important role that young people play in society. The system should also be driven by welfare and justice concerns as young people have special needs in regards to their age, and their physical, emotional and social development

“Youth offenders should not be dealt with more leniently than adult offenders.” Critically discuss this statement. There are many controversial issues that challenge our society in contemporary times, but one that raises much debate is youth offenders and if they should be dealt with in the same way as adult offenders. In modern times people are no longer surprised when children commit crimes but rather than basing our judgement around personalised review of circumstances, offence committed

Psychological research shows that eyewitness testimony is not always accurate; therefore it should not be used in the criminal justice system. Discuss. Word Count: 2,589 There has been considerable interest and study in the accuracy or inaccuracy of the use of eyewitness testimonies in the current criminal justice system. Results collated by several studies add to the bulk of literature suggesting that the current usage of eyewitness testimony by the legal system is far from ideal

Title: Assignment 1 - Essay Student Name: James Patrick Ryan Student Id: 17832377 Unit: (400684) Juvenile Crime and Justice Word Count: 1569 Question: Discuss the media’s contribution to a racialized construction of the relationship between migrant youth and crime. Begin this discussion by describing the term racialisation.   The effect of labelling potential offenders and the causal relationship between label and offence is an enduring question for criminal sociologists (Cunneen 1995). The

activities. However, the role of the Juvenile system is to make sure they are convicted as a ‘young offenders’ where courts will looks to provide them with the most appropriate sentencing for young people (applies for young people under the age of 18). This is due to young people lack maturity hence their thinking process differ from adults, as a result, they are more likely to commit in risky and anti social behaviors influenced by their peers (Aic.gov.au, 2015). In Australia, both welfare and justice model

To detain a person you are depriving them of their personal liberty (Findlay et al, 2000). The detention or imprisonment of offenders has been a consequence used for a variety of offences in society for hundreds of years. In recent times it has become such a frequently relied upon consequence that significant overcrowding in prisons has resulted (Findlay et al, 2000). In the 1990’s new implementations of rehabilitation were introduced to help ease the overcrowding in prisons. At this time, prison