Keystone Xl Pipeline : America's Energy

Some people believe that the president should not approve the construction because of what could happen to so many people and the wellbeing of our country.

The Keystone XL is a controversial oil pipeline extension that would travel from Alberta, Canada, to the United States Gulf Coast. The Keystone XL should not be built because of the damage it would cause to the environment. The oil would be found within tar sands that contain bitumen. The process of extracting the crude oil uses a lot of energy and causes a large amount of greenhouse gases. Many citizens, in Canada and the United States, are outraged because it can be detrimental to the surrounding land and wildlife. TransCanada, the company building the oil pipeline, has to receive permission from the United States government to begin construction. If the United States does not have the pipeline built and chooses to not use Canada’s oil, then TransCanada will have the pipeline built elsewhere and exported to other countries. There has been a divide between those in favor of the Keystone XL and those who are not. The Keystone XL would be able to provide the United States with a reliable source of oil, but it would also take the risk of faults in the oil pipeline and ruining parts of America’s resourceful soil. The Keystone XL will cause a negative effect on the environment and damage resourceful land; therefore, the oil pipeline should not be constructed.

One of the most controversial issues faced nowadays is the way we deal with the transport of oil. One of the proposed methods is The Keystone XL Pipeline. Although there are some pros associated with building the pipeline, the risk outweighs the benefits by far. Building the Keystone XL pipeline would negatively affect the environment, jeopardize the public health and is to no benefit to the American people.

Almost 95 million barrels of oil and fuel are produced each day in order to provide energy and fuel to people the world over. A major component of the oil industry is the transportation of oil through various means including oil pipelines. These pipelines are capable of transporting thousands of barrels of oil thousands of miles per day. In the United States one possible pipeline has caused a lot of controversy and discussion on the impact it will have on the United States. The difficulty in deciding if the Keystone XL Pipeline should be built is in whether the possibility of economic growth outweighs the possibility of environmental destruction. In order to make a decision, one must first look into the history of oil pipelines. It is crucial

The Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion project has brought forth many conflicting arguments, thus resulting in some parties being for it and some against it. I believe however, the risks are far greater than the rewards. The controversies surrounding the oil pipeline have brought up significant reports regarding environmental safety and concern with also safety and concern of the public. Due to the fact that presently, there is one operational pipeline running from Alberta to the Pacific Coast, I believe the introduction of a new pipeline would have disastrous consequences if something were to happen whether being an oil spill or a fire. The NEB (National Energy Board) failed to mention significant situations in which this pipeline could significantly

The Keystone XL Pipeline Project has many pros and cons just as any project does, but this project has way bigger cons than most projects this country will face today. “The Keystone XL Pipeline is an environmental crime in progress.” “It’s also been called the most destructive project on the planet.” The major issues with the Keystone XL Pipeline are “the dirty tar sands oil, the water waste, indigenous populations, refining tar sands oil and don’t forget the inevitable; pipeline spills.” And these are just some of the environmental issues, not too mention how building this thing from Canada to Texas; 2,100 miles to be exact, is affecting the people and their land, as stated “this isn’t a little tiny pipeline,

With an increasing global population and ever industrializing society 's, environmental concern is rarely given priority over economic incentive. But what people fail to realize is that our environmental failures, and relative apathy about it set up a plethora of problems for future generations to deal with. One of the most important decisions president Obama will face in the next year will be whether or not to approve the building of the Keystone XL pipeline, a massively sized, and massively controversial oil pipeline that would stretch all the way from Alberta Canada, to American oil refineries along the Gulf Of Mexico. Despite the economic incentive present, the building of the Keystone XL pipeline should not happen because of the

“For years, the Keystone pipeline has occupied what I frankly consider an over-inflated role in our political discourse,” said Obama (Article 2, Pg. 2). The Keystone and the Dakota pipeline one of two rejected by government administration. Protest still till this day are being held by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, other Native American tribes, and other supporters, to put a stop to the building of the pipeline which carries crude oil through: North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, and Illinois.

Now in first few weeks of the new administration, President Trump has been acting fast to keep his promises. Some of the first actions he took were to fulfill his promises concerning jobs and the economy. Before Trump was inaugurated he was given credit for keeping some jobs, from Carrier, from going to Mexico and some have said that was Trump proving that he could keep his promise to bring back jobs. His critics said that these particular jobs were never going to leave in the first place, and that these ‘kept’ jobs ought to be attributed to Obama’s administration not the then President Elect Trump. Some of the first place and that Trump signed after he was inaugurated were concerned with the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines

The Keystone Pipeline system was first operational in the year 2010. And since then it has caused much controversy. Of the different phases in the Keystone Pipeline system, phase one, two, and three are complete. Phase four, also known as Keystone XL, has been put off due to the large amount of controversy it has caused. The Keystone XL pipeline segments will be used to allow American crude oil to enter the pipeline system in Montana, on their way to the storage and distribution plants located in Oklahoma. In 2015, the Obama administration rejected the building of Keystone XL, but with the election of Donald Trump as president, an executive order was signed to advance the project. The reason for such controversy with the Keystone XL pipeline is the effects it will have on native people, land located around the proposed pipeline course, and the wild life, as well as the many complexities due to the economic, social and political issues.

The Keystone XL proposal is fascinating in both its complexity and controversy. As the pipeline would go through Canada and the United States, approval from the government of each country is required for the project to proceed. Political, economic, and environmental issues in both countries have put pressure on the governments with advocates and opponents for the proposal vying to have their voices heard. Even the Canadian federal political parties do not all agree on whether or not the pipeline should be built. The Conservatives, for instance support the proposal, citing its potential economic benefits while the Greens are against the project, arguing that the environmental impact is far greater than the economic gains it might produce. First Nations groups also have an important stake in the outcome of the project. The approaches taken towards aboriginal issues by the two parties have differed greatly from one another, further dividing the Greens and the Conservatives. Indeed, both parties seem so firmly entrenched in their own stances that it seems highly unlikely that they will ever reach an agreement on the project. Unless the Green Party and the Conservative Party can come to a consensus on the Keystone XL proposal’s effects on the economy, environment, and First Nations, they will be unable to reconcile their positions.

Imagine you live in a world where you cannot breathe properly because of the carbon levels in the atmosphere. Some argue that this world will become a reality if the Keystone XL pipeline is built. The Keystone XL pipeline is 1179 mile pipeline that transports oil from Hardisty to Steele City, then connects back to the main pipeline. This pipeline will significantly impact the greenhouse gas levels by emitting even more carbon dioxide than that which is currently being output. But some argue that a pipeline is the most environmentally friendly way to transport crude oil.

I think that trade policies in a union view could fit into a sustainable approach. I can also see some problems as well with this approach. An example that is current is the Keystone pipeline in North Dakota. Here are some of the issues- 1. Will affect the animals and their habits. 2 May impact oil production. 3. What pipelines could mean for the climate. 4. How the pipelines will impact people. The BlueGreen Alliance is a partnership of union labor groups and environmental groups. Together they have created a plan for long and short term goals that help companies with finance, new technology, and improve new projects. We also have to take in to consideration the location and climate. For location we have to look at political and trade relationships.

The Keystone XL Pipeline would be carrying oil from the Tar-sands, which emits 17 percent more carbon than other oil extractions (Brady and Horsley, par. 8). A report from the Sierra Club founded that, “an increase in tar-sands development could increase U.S. green- house gas emissions from 27 to 125 million tons by 2015” (Palliser, par. 8). The National Resources Defense Council reported that, “tar-sands oil also creates emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrous oxide, which contribute to acid rain (Palliser, par. 8). Allowing the construction of the Keystone pipeline would help increase production of dangerous oil, by giving a new pathway for increased

Our goals : Our intentions are to disrupt the ecological balance by laying waste to the infrastructure of oil pipelines, to bring awareness of the inherent perils to public knowledge. We intend to disrupt the ecological infrastructure by committing one of the worst Eco disasters mankind has ever seen. We intend to disrupt the flow of “liquid gold” to bring about awareness and change. Our goal is coercion, we aim to ultimately coerce the masses to substitute dangerous oil pipelines for cleaner, sustainable energy sources, which do not pollute the lungs of our earth. We intend to incapacitate the system by raising pressure, breaking the threshold, and causing an eruption from the inside out. Our goal is to bring about societal and environmental change forcibly.