preview

Khmer Rouge Revolution In Cambodia Essay

Decent Essays

In 1975, the Khmer Rouge invaded Phnom Penh. Lon Nol, the self-proclaimed president of Khmer Republic escaped Cambodia into exile. The Khmer Rouge won the Cambodian civil war and the national executive power. However, in the 1960s, the Khmer Rouge was the armed wing of the Communist Party of Kampuchea and was operating in remote mountain areas of Cambodia. The Khmer Rouge mobilizes farmers, especially the youth, in rural areas for support. The Prince Sihanouk’s disfavor and the Communist agrarian ideology of Pol Pot, who was the leader of the Khmer Rouge, deterred the party from gaining support from urban dwellers. The turning point came in 1970. A military coup led by Lon Nol overthrew Prince Sihanouk and China encouraged Prince Sihanouk …show more content…

If the cultural perspective still plays the major role, different leaders in different countries came into power after a regime change would propose different rules. Nevertheless, phenomenon such as repression of opponents, political manipulation and attempt to construct a new national identity have been shared among many countries, such as China and Iran, after revolutions. Instead of trying to find similar characters among leaders came into power during regime changes, scholars explaining revolutions through a structural perspective think that the need of eliminating opponents was created and people are carriers of structures. Since the case study demands both structural and cultural theoretical explanation, the following literature review would address the discourse of the definition of revolution, the rise of the structural theory, and the call for more analysis of agents. Revolution cannot be regarded as a universal concept; under different social contexts and in a different time, both Structuralism and cultural studies need to be considered to generate more substantive explanations. Structuralism rose when earlier theoretical explanations could not set the definition of revolution and could not explain why revolutions happened. Goldstone detailed the history of theoretical explanations (Goldstone). In the 1920s and 1930s, scholars only studied successful revolutions and identified ten common stages of the

Get Access