Second, there is nothing wrong with being a villain if society mistreats the evil character. Although society should be against evilness, a villain may justifiably perform evil acts if he is not treated fairly by society. King Lear, a play that involves the theme of man versus nature, is a perfect example of this. Edmund, one of the main evil characters in the play, must overcome the social ridicule that comes with being a bastard. In the beginning of the play, Edmund should not be blamed for how evil he acts since society refuses to respect his dignity. It seems that since Edmund has no one with whom he can reveal his evil deeds, he likes to express his feelings and plans out to the audience. As Cindy Erdin explains:
[Villains] use soliloquies
…show more content…
Despite the fact that he was “manmade”, he is opposing to the belief that God has created only legitimate people. In this passage, Edmund repetitively uses the word ‘legitimate’ which has various connotations. Anthony Gilbert explains that the word legitimate is “derived by its adoption from medieval Latin legitimatus, "my legiti- mate," that is, my 'legal' fellow, partner, equal, silently breaking yet another word up into its syllables” (Gilbert 9). This means that when Edmund says ‘my legitimate’, he is explaining to the audience that his brother is his legally equal partner. To Edmund, it does not matter if either brother was born with unmarried parents because all he wanted was the same respect that Edgar gets from his own father. This shows that Edmund chose the evil path to obtain his legal rights because he does not want to be treated as subordinate to a person who has the same sense of honor as …show more content…
In fact, some acts seem impossible to reenact in real life because it makes the audience think about if some villains are really life-like to them. In any case, exploring the villains’ purpose and development throughout stories are important as they assist the audience in understanding why evil characters deserve to be where they end up. For this reason, villains can still have the right motives to perform evil acts as long as they are not too observed in themselves. In specific, the villains can only act evil towards the characters that have done something unjustifiably against them. However, in most cases, if villains are taking their evil out on characters that never wronged them, then they prove why evil characters never triumph in the end. In Othello and King Lear, Iago and Edmund were fascinating characters to dissect because they are both evil in their own way. With Iago, the audience can see that he is the greatest manipulator of mankind and he enjoys interacting with them. Moreover, Iago is able to entertain the audience with his practical jokes but in the end, he gets carried away with his hatred on innocent women and causes a bloodbath. On the other hand, Edmund had a much serious conflict to deal with as he is fighting for his social rights when it comes to being a bastard. Although he
To be evil, villainous or Satan-like, is to state that one does hurtful things to other citizens for the pure enjoyment of themselves. Hitler, Stalin and Napoleon are all leaders, who undoubtedly can be stated as evil. In William Shakespeare’s tragedy Othello, the character Iago is considered evil. It is argued though that he is not evil, just simply a human. Iago throughout the play becomes insecure over his decline in power leading him to become jealous and get revenge on those who contributed to this feeling of self-doubt. Though Iago at times is satisfied with the way he treats others, his motives are humanistic and the way he deals with his envy for others makes him one of the manliest men in William Shakespeare’s Othello.
Evil appears through the menacing Iago and his devilish undertakings in Shakespeare’s Othello. Perceived as a sociopath, Iago antagonizes and fuels conflict. Through an interpretation by Ralph Berry, the literary critic identifies a “fairly clear-cut pattern of good and evil that can be closely identified with the three main personages: that is, of evil, personified in Iago, struggling in the soul of Othello for possession of the goo, Desdemona” (3). The conflict throughout the story is fueled by the good versus evil narrative. Firstly, evil shows its presence when Iago manipulates Othello into thinking his love, Desdemona, cheated on him. In response to Iago’s insinuation Othello speaks, “Nor from mine own weak merits will I draw/the smallest
Iago is one of the most misunderstood villains in Shakespeare literature. We side with Othello from the start because his name is on the cover of our paperback, we read Othello when learning about heroes, so we expect Iago to be a villain, a ruthless manipulator. We don’t know why, he doesn’t state it plainly or in simple English, so we assume that he’s evil, that he’s just a disgruntled sociopath out to exact his exaggerated revenge on good and noble Othello. Iago’s misunderstood reputation is a result of not truly examining his character, and answering the “why” factor behind his actions. After all, everyone is innocent until proven guilty. His goal in the play was not just to destroy Othello for the fun of it. His objective,
What makes a successful villain? In the case of Shakespeare’s Othello, Iago’s ability to manipulate the people around him with his words is what leads to his success. The play Othello is a tragedy. True to form, the play sees multiple deaths, all of which were due to Iago’s influences. The main theme of the drama is revenge. The events that take place are due to Iago’s pursuit of revenge. Iago manipulates the people and events throughout the course of the play in order to enact this revenge. In Othello, Iago manipulates the situations he finds himself in, the people who happen to be around him, and the words that come out of his mouth to ensure his mission for revenge is a success.
In the novel of King Lear, Lear was obviously a man who had everything because of course he was a king. When you have everything you sometimes forget about an important thing, and that is family.
William Shakespeares Othello uses different and unique techniques in his language to express the nature of evil throughout the play. Verbal twists and the characters most importantly stress the act of evil. Iago, most of all is portrayed as the villain or protagonist in the play. Shakespeare uses this character to set the basis of evil. Each plot point is spiraled further into tragedy due to the nature of Iago and his manipulative language towards the other main characters.
ignores Familial responsibility and engages in unreasonable conduct, blinded by their reputation to make suitable reparations. Is rejection of edmund as his illegitimate child fostered a sense of inadequacy that could only be satiated with vengeance on his brother and ….. to power. Therefore, Edmund choreographs an elaborate and malicious plan to convince his father that Edgar threatens his position and manipulates his father’s belief in the stars and a falsified letter to substantiate his claim. Accordingly, Gloucester reacts by creating a manhunt for Edgar and granting Edmund the authority he craves. While his actions may not seem as egregious or reprehensible as Lear's, his impetuous decision to hunt Edgar without verifying , confronting Edmund’s claims deprives Edgar of a chance for redemption or explanation.
How does one create the perfect villain for a story? What qualities are needed in such a character? A good place to start when constructing a villain is to look at William Shakespeare’s villain in Othello, a man called Iago. Iago is wonderfully devious. Throughout the play, he not only poisons Othello’s vision of Desdemona, he does this with no one, excepting Roderigo, the wiser. There are several reasons that make Iago such a terrifying villain. Shakespeare gave certain qualities to his creation that made Iago more than just a evil character. These qualities transform Iago into the truly insidious character seen in the play. From the beginning of Othello to the time that Iago is revealed as the culprit, everyone trusts Iago and looks to
First of all, the evil characters within the play such as Goneril, Regan, and Oswald got the justice they deserved. Both of these girls lied and treated those around them cruelly throughout the entirety of the play. They lied to their father about how much they loved him confessing things like, “Sir, I do love you more than words can wield the matter, / Dearer than eyesight, space, and liberty, / Beyond what can be valued” (I. i. 55-57) just to turn on him once they got the land they wanted. By the end of the play, they practically became King Lear’s enemies as they were plotting to have him killed. For lying to their father and attempting to kill the man who brought them up and gave them everything they know today, Goneril and Regan deserved
INTRO… Chaos is more powerful than authority in King Lear because chaos is caused by the mental decay of Edgar and Lear, two characters who represent authority.
Overall in the whole play, King Lear deserves some admiration by the end of it. Even though he did not necessarily transform from evil to good, but rather he has transformed into a whole new person from blindness into sight. He has found and realized his own wrongdoings by taking those steps and instead being an ignorant and selfish person. All of his answers and flashbacks about him as a character is also shown from how the kings daughters pretended to love him for his land and wealth, and it also lead him to change into someone who would love him for him. He has changed by giving his love to Cordelia at the end when he found out about her death and he was able to grasp a hold of reality in terms of truth. During the end of the novel you
Evil, an intense immoral wicked action that occurs from all around, whether that be fictional or real. Why evil exists in the world is best explained as a theodicy, clearing the suspicion of the power of a divine goodness towards the protective care of nature in view of the existence of evil. An example of a theodicy would be the words of Gloucester. A character in the play, King Lear, who endures horrible, horrible things that happen to him, provoking Gloucester to say the phrase, "As flies to wanton boys are we to the gods; They kill us for their sport" (4.2.37-38). Here Gloucester is comparing flies to us humans, and wanton boys to gods. The wanton boys kill flies for sport, because flies are nothing but bugs with no value, the same way
Justice, the one essential key to being able to reside in an ordered and supportive world. Justice shown in the play King Lear prove how certain actions can never be taken without repercussions to follow. With justice occurring in the world, people's being identity changes. Attempting to improve oneself from what one's birth order denotes you to be will always cause you to be brought down to one's rightful place through justice. Although mercy plays an important role in the order of a society, justice is the one main fundamental requirement needed between the two in order to live in a favourable world.
The subplot in King Lear is of Gloucester and his sons Edmund and Edgar. Edmund, the illegitimate, bastard son, can be seen as somehow unnatural according to the laws of society at that time. Gloucester himself says to Kent, regarding Edgar, "But I have, sir, a son by order of law..." (I.i. 18). The subtext here is that Edmund's conception was outside the law and unnatural to the social structure.
Good vs. Evil is a common theme in the play Macbeth. All of the characters are caught up in the battle between what is good and what is not. Macbeth makes a shift in his character from being good to turning evil. Lady Macbeth remains evil the whole time and tries to control Macbeth. The struggles that Lady Macbeth and Macbeth face exemplify the battle of good v. evil.