preview

Know Nothing Movement Vs. Anti-Chinese Campaign

Decent Essays

“Know nothing” Movement vs. Anti-Chinese campaign

Both the Anti-bellum nativist movement and the Anti-Chinese movement post-Civil War shared the concept “anti-immigrants,” and the fear that the foreigners would threaten American society’s well-being as a republican society and an ideally “white” society. Religiously, the United States was predominantly a protestant nation and had a long tradition of anti-Catholicism. Racially, and lots of native-born American “whites” recognized the Anglo-Saxon whites as the truly “white” race, and placed every other “race” in an inferior place. Although the targets of the Know Nothings were primarily European Catholic immigrants, whereas the Anti-Chinese nativists targeted exclusively Chinese, both movements …show more content…

As Tyler Anbinder pointed out, “Know Nothings admitted that the country needed immigrants, and consequently they never proposed restricting the flow of newcomers as a means to preserve the homogeneity they valued.” Instead, they sought to thoroughly “Americanized” future immigrants and mitigate their political influence. First, they proposed to make the immigrants wait for twenty-one years before they became citizens and were eligible to vote. The current five-year probation period, according to the Know Nothings, was not long enough for the newcomers to fully adopt American values and culture. Second, the Know Nothings urged voters to elect only native born to government positions, because “only those born and raised in America understood the complexities of operating a republican …show more content…

Their nativist movement started as early as the 1830s; by the 1850s, they had formed the “American Party;” 1856 witnessed the greatest success of the American party: it elected 7 governors, 8 United States senators, and a staggering 104 members of the United States House of Representatives. (Bayor, 66). These seemly impressive numbers, however, did not signify the success of the Know Nothings. On the one hand, the Know-Nothings were largely unsuccessful in passing significant legislation. For example, their proposal of the prohibition of immigration of paupers and convicts did not get passed; their use of violence and proposal of legislation to disfranchise immigrants were largely ineffective. On the other hand, the American party began to collapse sharply soon after it reached its phenomenal growth. Members of the party continued to split on the issue of slavery, which eventually led Party to fall into oblivion. The party’s presidential nominee, Millard Fillmore carried only Maryland in the 1856 presidential

Get Access