Ashley Newman
Phil 422- Prof. Livingston Language as an Image of Reality
Wittgenstein’s the Tractatus and Plato’s Cratylus are two works that offer remarkably comparable theories. The Tractatus uses propositions to establish a theory regarding language and Plato uses names in the dialogue Cratylus to develop a similar theory. Using propositions and names, respectively, the two philosophers develop arguments showing that there is an extreme parallel between language and pictures. After Plato discloses the origination of names and Wittgenstein looks at the composition of propositions, the two philosophers are able to assess the relation between names, propositions and reality. The relation of names and propositions to reality leads
…show more content…
He determines that names are composed of smaller parts, letters and vowels, which correspond to the elements that compose the thing it is naming. Socrates begins by focusing on “first names.” First names are determined to be the names from which all other names are composed. If all other names come from these first names though, how then are first names decided? This brings Socrates to acknowledge the importance of breaking down these first names into their elemental forms of letters and syllables. Because there are no names before first names that offer a way to name first names, he decides each letter and syllable of a first name must correspond to an element of which it is composed. For example “h” might correspond to being made of flesh.
He relates this concept of a name being composed of smaller things making up a whole to the art of painting when he says, “It’s just the same as it is with painters.” This is a parallel that is easy to
of many that relates to the importance of a mans name and his namesake. This concept
What’s in a name? A name is a defining characteristic of a human being. It carries with it accomplishments, traits, stories, and a legacy. When Caesar Augustus radically changed Roman civilization, he established a legacy that would far outlive him. After years of political turmoil, he “brought the city and the empire from the chaos of civil war to a system of ordered and stable government” (Shotter, Introduction). Along with his strong influence on government policies, his influence found its way into parts of culture, such as architecture, religion, and literature as well. In doing this, Caesar Augustus created a name for himself that would outlive him for centuries to come.
His name was all he had to represent him. So One’s name means something to
A name is one of the first things we are defined with; it's a simple combination of words that becomes associated with our being. In Children of Monsters, Jay Nordlinger questions how much significance a name really holds.
This book explains the major theories of Wittgenstein, a well-known linguistic philosopher in the 20th century. Wittgenstein argued that ethics and religions are beyond the boundaries of language and therefore cannot be communicated. Ethics and religions are mysterious truths that can only be realized rather than be taught. This source presents another aspect of the question – rather than an ethical lens, I can re-examine my question on the aspect of linguistic philosophy. However, as a secondary source, it is biased since the author’s interpretation of Wittgenstein might be limited or even wrong. But the value of the source is that it explains Wittgenstein’s complex theories in simple language and leads me to two famous works of Wittgenstein for further
Although there is no official language in the United States, the English language is the most widely spoken. Language helps to shape our identities, define and limit our expectations of the world around us and who we are. You might ask yourself, how does our language shape our identities and influence our perceptions of the world? Through language, we are able to make meaning, understand, and define ourselves. We are able to communicate what we feel, our ideas, our hopes, and our dreams with others who can respond to our feelings and thoughts. However, our choice of words cannot always capture what we are feeling to the full extent.
A NAME IS MUCH MORE THAN JUST A NAME. HISTORY DOES NOT REPEAT ITSELF but sometimes it rhymes.
In Emile Habiby’s The Secret Life of Saeed: the Pessoptimist and Oscar Wilde’s The Importance of Being Earnest the idea that names actually mean what they say saves these two works from becoming tragedies because it gives The Importance of Being Earnest a comedic plot, the names in The Secret Life of Saeed: the Pessoptimist represent present options for Saeed, and the characters in both works live in a world that does not reject the notion that names have meaning. The characters in The Importance of Being Earnest, particularly Gwendolyn and Cecily, believe in the notion that one’s name indicates one’s characteristics. While he is under the guise of Ernest, Jack confesses his feelings to Gwendolyn and she comments that her “ideal has always
Language affects people. Teenagers often use their own jargon and feel like they belong. Jonathan Winawer said that Russians can distinguish different blue color well than people who use other languages. This is because there are more words about blue color in Russian, it helps to recognize different colors of blue. Also, you've heard about the results of an experiment that onions that continue to sound bad have faded and the onions that keep on saying good things grew well. Language is even affecting plant life. And I wonder how language can influence dystopia.
In Emile Habiby’s The Secret Life of Saeed: the Pessoptimist and Oscar Wilde’s The Importance of Being Earnest the idea that names actually mean what they say saves these two works from becoming tragedies because it gives The Importance of Being Earnest a comedic plot, the names in The Secret Life of Saeed: the Pessoptimist represent present choices for Saeed, and the characters in both works inhabit worlds that do not reject the notion that names have meaning. The meaning of names is incredibly important in both stories. Without them both Ernest and Saeed would have to deal with situations that are much more tragic.
He is particularly concerned with the concept of cluster description. The supporters of the descriptive theory argue that a name corresponds to a descriptive meaning rather than a definite description. It is impracticable to attach any significance to a specific description in the meaning of names. For instance, someone known as Jeff Wellington would be a church leader living in Knoxville Street and would still be David's dad bearded and with a bald. All such descriptions refer to one person Jeff Wellington each giving us more information about him. Jeff is a man of God and a father, thus the idea of cluster concept. Whatever satisfies most of the cluster of description attached to a name is the original bearer of that particular
Names can say much about the character and Allende uses this well, using them as a device in the novel to explore the relations between the characters with out to much explaining.
The Effect of Language on Perception Language: Language is defined as any body which can be written, spoken, or otherwise communicated between individuals and/or groups. Taking this definition into account, language is not specific to human beings. Animals are also affected by a form of language. Body language is also a notable form of communication. It is a member of the type of language communicated via implication.
It is essential to argue Heidegger’s concepts of everydayness and worldliness, and Wittgenstein’s notion of phenomenological representation and language, which is most plainly demonstrated in his separation between description and explanation. Undoubtedly, there is not a full similarity, there is no direct correspondence, but the connections that do appear to be there are to some extent exciting and at the same time
This essay analyses the role of the language in colonized land by English empire. More in specific, how the colonial and post-colonial poems dealing with this powerful tool which is ‘language’. I will take in consideration Derek Wolcott. Drawing thought two of his poems, I am going to point out the way he uses ‘language’,