preview

Language As An Image Of Reality

Decent Essays

Ashley Newman
Phil 422- Prof. Livingston Language as an Image of Reality
Wittgenstein’s the Tractatus and Plato’s Cratylus are two works that offer remarkably comparable theories. The Tractatus uses propositions to establish a theory regarding language and Plato uses names in the dialogue Cratylus to develop a similar theory. Using propositions and names, respectively, the two philosophers develop arguments showing that there is an extreme parallel between language and pictures. After Plato discloses the origination of names and Wittgenstein looks at the composition of propositions, the two philosophers are able to assess the relation between names, propositions and reality. The relation of names and propositions to reality leads …show more content…

He determines that names are composed of smaller parts, letters and vowels, which correspond to the elements that compose the thing it is naming. Socrates begins by focusing on “first names.” First names are determined to be the names from which all other names are composed. If all other names come from these first names though, how then are first names decided? This brings Socrates to acknowledge the importance of breaking down these first names into their elemental forms of letters and syllables. Because there are no names before first names that offer a way to name first names, he decides each letter and syllable of a first name must correspond to an element of which it is composed. For example “h” might correspond to being made of flesh.
He relates this concept of a name being composed of smaller things making up a whole to the art of painting when he says, “It’s just the same as it is with painters.” This is a parallel that is easy to

Get Access