Criminal Justice & Military Studies
Outline
Thesis: In the wake of the recent police brutality, the law enforcers should be encouraged to wear body cameras.
Body
Argument for making use of body cameras:
• Record and keep track of the evidence at the scene of the crime.
A judge will be provided with the chance for them to see and hear exactly what took place at an incident, which is very different from reading reports that have been written down by the officers.
• The lowered litigation costs that arise from the expedited lawsuits.
The frivolous and the justified complaints against the police are bound to cost vast amounts of money in the jury verdicts and settlements.
• To instill trust in the public
The cameras will have the ability to reduce the complaints on the officers that make use of unnecessary force or poor behavior from the residence or the officer.
• Positive feedback
In the places where the body cameras have been used, there has been a reduction of the complaints as well as the use of force
Argument against making use of body cameras:
• Cameras are an invasion of privacy
In the event that the police are wearing a
…show more content…
One of the advantages is that the cameras would be able to record and keep track of the evidence at the scene of the crime. The cameras ensure accurate statements as well as face recognition from the witnesses and the victims. There will be no need to rely on another person’s partial picture of what took place; the police will have their own. The use of the cameras by the officers on duty is bound to give rise to hard evidence when it comes to the decisions that are made by the officers when it comes to the high-intensity situations. A judge will be provided with the chance for them to see and hear exactly what took place at an incident, which is very different from reading reports that have been written down by the officers (Drover & Ariel,
Body cameras can hold police officers accountable for their actions, both the good and the bad. “Continuously wearing body cameras would hold police accountable for their appropriate, and inappropriate, conduct” (Buam). Also when the citizens make accusations they could pull the video from the camera and see whether the police officer did what they said they did or not. “Video recorded by body cams protect any false accusations, misconduct, or abuse
The social media and the public might want police body cam footage release but sometimes it might be to graphic or controversial. Police body cameras have been a topic since the incident with Michael Brown in august of 2014. Police shot and killed an unarmed individual in ferguson, MO, leading to many people wanting cameras on police. Whether the cameras are a good idea or not this paper will explore the facts and sides of police body cameras. Overall body cameras should be required Because they can save the lives of the innocent, keep innocent people from going to jail, and can help a case as more evidence.
Across the country a growing number of legislative departments have been debating about the pros and cons of police body cameras. This paper will further explore benefits, as well as the downfalls of using such devices. This paper will also look at specific cases and examine whether or not body cameras were helpful in various situations. It will examine if they were a deterrent in cases dealing with police brutality and domestic violence. It also looks at how they could be misused and assisting some officers in covering up their corrupt behavior.
In today 's society, one highly debatable topic is whether or not law enforcement agents should wear body cameras. Most cameras used by law enforcement agencies across the country record audio and video, therefore, the cameras see and hear nearly everything a law enforcement officer does. There are many advantages to law enforcement personnel using body cameras while on duty because it holds the officers accountable, is used to document the contact made between the officers and the victims and/or suspects, supports the “use of force” action, keeps the officers and citizens honest, and the videos can even be used for training for other officers.
Body cameras in policing are still new, but more and more agencies are beginning to implement this technology into their line of work. At first police officers were very hesitant to wear these body cameras because they were afraid they would infringe themselves and give away their own privacy. Later, as body cameras were beginning to see more use in the work place, officers began to realize that these very own body cameras that they once thought would only cause themselves harm would actual prove to be useful in a variety of situations. Some of these situations can be citizen complaints, to even backing up an officers use of force. Body cameras can be the one sole thing that can give
Historically speaking, authorities of the law were never in a position where their professional duties and their character as a public servant of the law were demeaned in a way that there needs to be constant surveillance of them and the people whom they come into contact with. There was never a need of documenting every encounter you had with a civilian before. In this day in age, things have certainly changed, and the past has always been something society likes to change and make better even if it raises concerns. Due to all the violent police stories that has surfaced in the past decade, the idea of having police officers wear video cameras as a part of their uniform while on duty has resulted in a radically divergent account of society’s future. The law may uphold cops to wear cameras while working, but is this really the best decision? This topic is very controversial and may create issues with cops and the civilians they try and protect in the future.
In today’s world, body cameras are being worn by more than half of the police officers in the United States. Many people will say that body cameras are invading their privacy and they will cause bigger issues, but others will say that the body cameras are an improvement and will help everyone out in the long run by resolving the issues. Body cameras will prevent incidents of police brutality and improve law enforcement. They should be worn for the police officer’s safety as well as the citizens who are interacting with the police, so that way the footage will show what really happened in a situation.
For many years illegal use of force by police officers has been going on, but body cameras can finally put an end to it. Body cameras will be able to seize illegal use of force because they can clear up any lies, they can make police officers think twice before using excessive force, and they will stop police officers from writing false reports.
Body cameras on police would make it to where police could not be falsely accused of police brutality. There has been many news reports on police brutality and some are true, however some are also false. When an officer
Could be evidence for cases so the jury can see what happened exactly. It can help protect police departments and the officers. According to News Max “A 2013 University of Cambridge study found that when police wear body cameras, both police and respondents are less likely to use violence. The study indicated a drop in use of force by more than a 50 percent. Body cameras could thus make the
An increased attention on fatal police encounters and citizen’s complains of improper use of force have led to calls for law-enforcement officers to wear body cameras when on duty. In order to improve policing and police oversight the following recommendations are suggested: 1) Body cameras should record at all times to increase accountability, 2) Monitoring should be done with a “fire alarm” approach to incur effective oversight, 3) Footage must remain private to not decrease police productivity by over monitoring. The cameras must be required to be on recording mode when police officers are on duty and when they respond to calls for service.
Firstly, police officers should be required to use body cameras because the body cameras will help the police officers to file a truthful report. For example, "Exposure to the video footage will almost certainly enable them to provide richer and more accurate accounts of the incident. But the critics' main objection to the policy is that it will promote dishonest reporting. Officers, it is feared, will tailor their reports to fit the captured images, revealing only what could not be plausibly denied and leaving out other important details." In other words, by the police officers reviewing the video footage, they can give a more detail honest response.
The main purpose of putting cameras on police officers is to provide accountability for actions by the police and suspects. Holding police officers accountable for misconduct will help rebuild crumbling public trust in law enforcement. Cases of excessive use of force can be reviewed from video evidence instead of the account of the officer, who may attempt to protect himself, or witnesses, who may have the complete unfolding of events or have a bias against law enforcement. The shooting of Michael Brown by Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson was one of many police use-of-force cases that sparked protests against the law enforcement, citing seemingly racist conduct by the Ferguson Police Department.
First and foremost the use of body worn cameras in the Law enforcement is laudable, however cameras has its pros and cons. I have confidence in the use of body worn camera, but before this cams are made compulsory for all Law enforcement personnel they should be tested. The use of this system will bring transparency within the law enforcement agency, but it will do more harm than good both for the public and law enforcement agency.
Ever wondered when police brutality is going what a Police Officer is thinking who is watching and why is happening. Police officers should be required to use body cameras because it will reduce the force in police officers, cameras will also make citizens feel safe and, to avoid bias views. But police officers be required to use body cameras because it can lead to distrust.