Learning Experience Seven: Uses of Rocks and Soils
1.The learning experience did not differ much from the original lesson, but a few changes were made due to my availability of resources. I did not read the book, Rocks and How to Use Them by Pine and Levine. I was unable to get the book for the lesson, but instead of reading this book, I allowed students to first think of uses of rocks and soils on their own, then discussed resources around the room that could possibly have rocks or soils as the main ingredient.
Section1a In this learning experience, all students were working in their zone of proximal development, which was created by child theorist Lev Vygotsky. This lesson included multiple ways of receiving the information; discussion,
…show more content…
Students were first asked to think of everyday objects they believe are made out rocks and/or soils. Students mentioned glass, buildings, and kitchen counter tops. Students were able to develop a list of items that we use currently, but I encouraged them to think back to the past. I asked questions such as, “How did we make certain items in the past without having a Walmart or a Target?” I then asked students to think back to our lessons before rocks and soils, “What people did we learn about?” Students were able to identify the Native Americans. Student were able to name natural resources as the source Native Americans used to create tools and jewelry. I then activated the students’ knowledge by showing images of Native American jewelry, pots, and weapons which were all made out of clay. I asked students to think about what the items could be made out of. Students were able to use their knowledge of soil properties to correctly identify it as clay. Having a relationship with my students and knowing my students knowledge of Native Americans, made this learning experience an easy and fun experience for students. It also made the delivery of knowledge, one that catered to each child’s learning ability. Student got to view pictures, discuss uses, and have a hand-on experience with creating their very own clay creations. According to Piaget’s theory, “teachers have to make a curriculum plan which enhances their students' logical and conceptual growth. Teacher must put emphasis on the significant role that experiences-or connections,” (Piaget’s Theory of Constructivism). When we use students’ prior knowledge to connect to our everyday world/experiences, students have a greater opportunity to learn and grow in their
However, Vygotsky, on the other hand, mentioned that in order to educate someone it must happen in small groups with one better performing student indicating the importance of the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) (Vygotsky, 1978). The ZDP is the difference between a child’s actual development level and potential development level, undertaken by a child performing tasks with assistance from a more knowledgeable/capable peer or teacher (Duchesne & McMaugh, 2016). This notion is both effective on the social and cognitive development of a young child as the theory of play is also interconnected, helping the child to develop. The ZPD is very closely intertwined with the indication of scaffolding where teachers or others provide support towards the learner in order to enable a task to be completed successfully by adjusting to the
The topic The Australian Gold Rush is a unit successfully support the children in grade 5 to learn new knowledge, skills and values to become active citizens. To achieve successful lessons requires a teaching philosophy to include theories of a lesson plan. Vygotsky believes that when children are within their Zone of proximal development and are provided with the appropriate assistance, students will achieve the tasks successfully. For example, Vygotsky is known for the theory zone of proximal development (ZPD) Alaniz, 2012). “Cognitive capacity does not precede instruction, but rather ‘unfolds in a continuous interaction with the contributions of instruction.’” (Vygotsky 2012:195, as cited in Kalantzis et. al. 2016:442)This is defined as
In Investigating Rocks and Sand: Addressing Multiple Learning Styles through an Inquiry-Based Approach, Oga and Schmidt, 2009, describe the way kindergarten teachers implemented inquiry based learning into their classrooms by integrating their students ' interest of rocks and sand into the curriculum. By nature humans are curious creatures, and this is seen from the time to when we are infants to the time when we are adults. Inquiry is an intrinsic learning strategy that we use to gather information from the day that we are born. (Ogu, U. & Schmidt, S. 2009). For this reason, "… it makes sense for teachers to use an inquiry-based approach in their curriculum." (Ogu, U. & Schmidt, S. 2009, p.2).
As an educator, I believe my main job is to make sure that I am teaching/helping my student to the best of my ability. As an educator, one of my jobs is to make sure that I give all of my students the best information and experiences that they need to be successful in school and in life. For this paper I will discuss three theories that I feel is important to use when teaching young children math, reading, science and fine arts. The three theories that I feel best describe and work with my teaching styles is Vygotsky Zone of proximal development, Bronfenbrenner microsystem theory and Piaget preoperational stage theory. Educator should always follow educational theories and philosophies because in order to teach a child correctly we must know and understand how they learn and process information.
Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory of cognitive development is evidently in effect in Mr Gino’s classroom in relation to the zone of proximal development (ZPD) and importance of scaffolding (Duchesne, & McMaugh, 2016). The ZPD is one of the major structures of Vygotsky’s theory and refers to the relationship between how much a child has developed academically alone and the potential for development with the assistance of a more knowledgeable other (Fani, & Ghaemi, 2011). With this comes the idea of scaffolding in which a students learning is temporarily enhanced by the assistance of another student or adult which is better enlightened on a topic (Fani, & Ghaemi, 2011). This is applied in Mr Gino’s classroom by group work. Each group is given
One of the most prevailing aspects of Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory is what he named the zone of proximal development. Vygotsky defined the zone of proximal development as “[t]he area of development into which a child can be led in the course of interaction with a more competent partner, either adult or peer. [It] is not some clear-cut space that exists independently of joint activity itself. Rather, it is the difference between what the child can accomplish independently and what he or she can achieve in conjunction with another, more competent person. The zone is thus created in the course of social interaction” (Vyogtsky FIND PAGE NUMBER). SEE MIND IN SOCIETY IN LIBRARY The zone of proximal development, known as the ZPD, is the place in which a child benefits the most from exposure to an activity or task. This is because “...children’s cognitive abilities increase through exposure of information that is new enough to be intriguing, but not too difficult for the child to contend with” (Feldman 228-229). Within this zone, children are able to perform some of, but not all of, the task independently. With the help of someone with more capable, they are able to complete the task. In this way, children are able to increase understanding and learn new tasks while avoiding frustration and defeat, meanwhile building confidence.
The zones were actual, proximal and future. The zone of actual development is what the child is able to do independently, the zone of proximal is what the child is able to do with help and the future is what the child will learn and carry on to do independently once they have received the support they need. According to Meggitt, C, ' The zone of proximal development (ZPD), sometimes called the zone of potential development- this means that then child can do with help now what it will be possible for him or her to do alone with no help later on' (2015:57). Vygotsky viewed development as a continuous process.
Vygotsky argued that the child’s cognitive abilities are increased when the child is exposed to information, which are quite aknown to be interesting, but no excessively difficult to deal with. The level that a child is able to almost, but not completely, conduct a project independently but with the help of someone more competent is called the Zone of Proximal Development. When children receive the appropriate guidance, within the
The fifth chapter of this textbook explained the different stages of physical and cognitive development that children undergo during the early childhood years. Different theories were discussed when analyzing cognitive development in younger children. Lev Vygotsky founded a theory known as the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) using an approach that links social communication with knowledge construction in the developing mind of a child. He used different techniques such as scaffolding to enhance this theory and stress the importance of language/support as a way of shaping independent thought.
Vygotsky believes that “zone of proximal development” it’s the difference between a child learning abilities to carry out a job alone against direction.
Vygotsky main love was for kids that had disabilities both mental and physical, to help with Vygotsky's idea Vygotsky came up with the concept of Zone of Proximal Development(ZPD). According to Schunk (2012) the concept of (ZPD) is defined as the distance between the actual developmental level as determined through problem solving under adult guidance or in collaboration with more capable peers
I have been working in the early childhood profession for 12 years. I have been employed off and on at seven different centers as a teacher, substitute, floater, cook, van driver, and receptionist for nine of those years and a Director at one center for the other three of those years. At each of the centers, I had a different experience, which allowed me to obtain a variety of “Do’s” and “Don’ts” for the beliefs of my future center. Through my coursework, I gain the proper guidelines to follow when putting my belief into action. And as for the behaviorist influence, there is one that I found to be quite intriguing; Lev Vygotsky. I gravitated towards Vygotsky because of his Zone of Proximal Development Theory, which is so greatly defined by the picture
Lev Vygotsky believed that social and cognitive development work simultaneously to build and evolve on one another. He believed that social, cultural and personal experience cannot be detached from each other and many things influence the way children learn and develop, not just their own experiences, thus Vygotsky’s socio-cultural theory. Vygotsky’s ideas were and remain controversial as he had no specific training in psychology or children’s development. His preeminent contribution to children’s development is his recognition of the value of progressing knowledge by means of interaction with educators, peers and family (Mooney, 2000, p. 83). The major ideas of Vygotsky’s theory are scaffolding and the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). Scaffolding is a process Vygotsky described as the framework or temporary support for children’s learning. In order for scaffolding to
Dewey (1959) sees experience and education as being dialectically connected. Hence, to Dewey, the experiences that the teacher designs and creates in the classroom, e.g. tools, activities or the environment, have an impact on students’ learning. The experiences must be relevant, authentic and meaningful to the students for effective learning to take place. Besides individuals’ experiences, Dewey gives space for social experiences as well. He believes that students’ interactions with others and the environment are crucial factors contributing to their learning. Dewey’s belief is further extended by Vygotsky’s (1978) model of Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). Vygotsky believed that collaboration with others helps one to complete tasks that one could not have done without assistance from and collaboration with others. The ZDP is the level at which learning takes place. It comprises cognitive structures that are still in
One of the most challenging ideas I tried to teach to the scouts would have to be about geographical surroundings and the geographical materials that make up the buildings. I feel as if I did not know enough about the subject matter, or how to present it correctly in a way that was truly benefiting the scouts. However, the scout leaders were