Legal Age Research Paper

Every day teens are given access to automobiles. Every day these young people go to their jobs, classes, and athletic practices. Do they all abuse their driving privileges? No. Then why restrict all teens, including the law-abiding and mature, by raising the driving age? This debate reaches all across the nation, to all levels of government, and many related laws and propositions can be found. If the driving age is increased, teenagers will have more difficulty getting jobs and gaining experience. On the other hand, if the driving age is 18, new drivers will have more maturity. So the question remains, should the legal driving age be 18 years old? No, the current driving age

One of the biggest reasons kids under the age of 21 get in trouble is having drugs or alcohol on their body. Now, because they are underage it is a big deal. Once the underage teenager’s are found with the substance of alcohol on their body its automatically a minor in possession. (MIP). The ramification of the offense due to its recent changing would be ineluctably punishable by only a $100 fine and this definitely more of a feasible way of punishment, compared to when it wasn’t just a civil infraction and it was a $500 dollar fine and up to 90 days in jail. But by lowering the drinking age,you would not only minimize the traffic in the court systems which take up more serious cases’ time you would also give the underage citizens another chance of straightening their life. Because not in everyone’s case that it’s their fault when they get an MIP. Receiving an MIP will dampen their

Personally, I believe that the drinking age is too high currently. I especially believe this because teenagers still drink alcohol well before they are of legal age, so I do not see a point in having the

I believe that changing the drinking age to 18 would be beneficial to the younger age people in many ways and could change the way an average teen lives for the better and the worst too, but only if it is done without knowing what your limit is, but that is only if there is no parent figure or guardian or if the guardian is very care-free and doesn't care but that is not the case in more homes.

The United States is one of the four countries in the world with a legal drinking age as high, or higher, than 21 years of age. Reportedly the reason for this is because it helps to lower th

The legal drinking age in the U.S. has been a topic of discussion for years. Many people think the legal drinking age should be 18 and not 21. People often argue that you can die for our country in the military at the age of 18, but can't legally drink a beer? It doesn't make any sense at all. You can vote and help decide the next leader of our country, but can't legally purchase a mixed drink with your friends?

The legal drinking age in Australia should be raised to 21 (Argue the validity of this statement)

I belive drinking age should be changed from twenty-one to eighteen. The drinking age was changed from eighteen to twenty-one in 1984 in the United States. Drinking age is eighteen in many countries such as Germany, Mexico, Turkey and almost all European countries. You have to be eighteen to vote, you have to be eighteen to enlist in the military and actually put your life at risk and make life and death decisions but you can not drink? I believe these are the most important examples to follow for why the government should change the drinking age. Also, to legally bind yourself in marriage, commit for a partnership for life at the age of eighteen but can not have an alcoholic beverage? On top of this, driving age in most states is sixteen.

First and foremost, if we have truly care for the youth, we will not implement these changes. Having a set age helps, yes, but does not eradicate underage drinking. Seventy-two percent of people under age eighteen have drank alcohol already. These young adults are going to be drinking regardless of what the law states and if it is raised, it will only lead to higher unsafe environments where these parties occur. The worry of getting caught, for these young adults, is in the back of their mind each time they’re around alcohol. If someone is intoxicated, these people will be more fearful than ever to call authorities for help in cases where that person might have alcohol

In conclusion, the drinking age should be lowered to prevent future failiures the people of today should already know how to take responsibility for their actions with anything life puts in there way and should have learned from school how to not ruin your life or quite th opposite i dont know kill

Some people may believe that the minimum driving age should be lowered instead of raised . They believe the teens can handle the big responsibility of driving. Adults believe teens can be able to drive and stay on track at school. They don't think it's a big responsibility to them. “There's no age limit to drive” some day yes teenagers are responsible enough to drive and follow the basic steps of driving and stay on the roads they are suppose to

Many argue that the age of responsibility should be 21 and over, but in the article “What id the age of Responsibility?” by Alan Greenblatt issues that “Most states issue driver’s licenses to persons as young as 16 years old”, and “many are considering lowering the drinking age from 21, argue that if students were given the right to drink at an earlier age they might handle it more responsibly” (Greenblatt 2,4). It also states that “It was common for 18 year olds to support themselves and start their own families, own distinctive stage of development” (Greenblatt 8). But different parts of the brain mature along different time tables and most people are capable of performing many adult functions adequately at an earlier age, between the age of 16 and 21.

A quote from “What is the Age of Responsibility?” by Alexander Wagenaar, a health policy professor at the University of Florida, states that “The people who are advocating going down to 18, should acknowledge that they’re willing to risk an extra thousand deaths per year and double that number of injuries.” (3) However, this is a common misconception that the amount of teen highway deaths can be lowered by raising the legal drinking age. A quote from “A 16-year-old is as good as an 18-year-old -- or a 40-year-old -- at driving,” by Lawrence Steinberg, states “...in practice we create legal boundaries for a complex mix of political and practical reasons, which frequently lead to las that make no sense… Actually, countries with a higher driving age but a lower drinking age have far safer highways than we do.” This clarifies the fact that raising the driving age will alleviate teen car accidents more than raising the legal drinking age will. To the contrary, setting the drinking age at 21 only exacerbated the problem. This encouraged young adults to disrespect the law by using fake IDs. It also deprives them the legal access to social activity which is prevalent throughout the United States. Doing so also encouraged student binge drinking at universities under illegal and unsafe circumstances. Lowering the drinking age to 18 would simply mitigate the stress regarding alcohol

Raising the age was not an idea based on opinions. Over the years many people and organizations have recorded facts and statistics to support their claims. An example shown on CBS News, shows that “More than 5,000 U.S. teens die each year in car crashes. The rate of crashes, fatal and nonfatal, per mile driven for 16-year-old drivers is almost 10 times the rate for drivers ages 30 to 59, according to the National Highway Safety Administration” (CBS NEWS). One huge influence on the topic was the Insurance Institutes for Highway Safety, they created a seventeen page memo filled with statistics and examples of how raising the age is a necessity. This is not the first attempt to use statistics to support the appeal to raise the age. The Seattle Times states, “The example the institute uses most prominently is New Jersey, the only state with a minimum driver's license age of 17. The report cited a study from 1992-96 in which the rate of crash-related deaths among 16- and 17-year-olds was 18 per 100,000 in New Jersey, compared with 26 per 100,000 in Connecticut, which had a minimum driver's license age of 16 and 4 months” (Willette). Overall the argument that raising the age will result in less teen deaths while driving is highly justified. There are frequent examples and a huge amount of research that proves that younger drivers are more likely to cause harm or damage than an older, more experienced driver.

The legal drinking age should not be a common controversial topic of debate that people argue about time and time again. It is so obvious to see that when the law was passed to make the legal drinking age twenty-one years, it was the best decision for our nation. Alcohol is the main drug problem for the youth in the United States and as well as the world. This problem is carried over when teenagers get behind the wheel while intoxicated. Although, from studies carried out, young drivers are less likely to drink and drive however the severity of accidents caused by drunken teens outweighs the accidents caused by adults. The legal drinking age should remain as is and there are countless reasons to back this claim.