Legal Liability of Parents Essay

Individuals over time have fashioned children as being weaker, gullible targets. Children cannot articulate or function on the level as adults this is due to the lack of acquired knowledge and maturity at such ages, but this is to be expected of a child someone that is totally dependent on someone else for basic survival. Because children are dependent on other this give an advantage to the adult caregiver to abuse the child in the capacity in which they choose. Reflecting on a situation in which I am familiar, there was a trial in Chesapeake that involved the death of an infant by the hands of the mother’s boyfriend. The boyfriend brutally beat the child to the point of the child suffering from multiple factors and broken bones after a few days in a medical induced coma the child was removed from all support and passed

No-one deserves to be abused, be that physically, emotionally or sexually and the same rules apply that no child or young person should be subjected to neglect. It is every child’s right to live without fear of harm or abuse.

If a child acted violently toward another child, should the parents of that child be held responsible for the inappropriate behavior, or should the child take full responsibility for his/her actions? This question of responsibility comes up often in Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein. Her horrific and dark tale of the mad, science-obsessed Victor Frankenstein, wanting to create life from what had already been dead, evokes questions of who is at fault for the creature’s murders. Although some may say that the creature is at complete fault because he is own “person”, but ultimately Victor is at fault because he is the one who created a being that destroyed the lives of innocent people due to how he treated the creature.

Countless number of children that are removed from their homes should not have been. In New York alone, just as the police have to distribute a certain amount of citations a month, CPS workers are required by law to remove a certain amount of children a month to meet their quota. I believe that when a crime is committed against a child, police action should be take a s a necessary procedure to properly investigate and gather accurate evidence of abuse, therefore giving the accused fair due process.

Parents are very closely associated with their children, if they notice signs or behavioural symptoms of their child being harmed they should talk to the child

the irresponsible and neglectful parents go unpunished. The good parents have to fight tooth and

Today?s legal system states that children between the ages two to six should not be held liable for criminal actions. There are several developmental characteristics that support this claim. These characteristics come from biological, cognitive, and psychosocial areas. For those who are religious, one can also find spiritual support in Scripture that validates young children cannot reason as older children or adults can. Until a child?s brain matures, it is likely that a child may act impulsively and could commit a crime without reasoning beforehand that he or she

Many people say that parents take care of their kids a certain way through what they believe in or were they came from. Some parents believe that the only way the child will learn from their mistake is by physically punishing them. People think that we shouldn’t get involved because it’s not our problem. In the article, “U.S. Title: Fixing Foster Care: Fostering stability,” proves that there have been cases where parents have been caught in abusing their child but the court would usually side with them. It says, “Courts have long held that parents have a fundamental right to raise their children as they see fit, and that social and cultural norms for attention, affection, supervision, and discipline vary widely.”

United States can be analyzed to support the charge. The case involved Shirley Green who was not the legal guardian of a child that failed to provide food and medicine for the child resulting in his death. She was charged with involuntary manslaughter, but it was reversed because there was no finding of legal duty CITE218. Legal duty is a critical element is cases and since Mrs. Kones has a legal duty for the care of John Jr. she can be charged with this crime. Within the text it explains that someone ca be held criminally liable when there is a statute that imposes a duty. Next, when someone has a certain relationship to another. When someone accepts a contractually duty to care for someone. Finally, when someone voluntarily assumes the responsibility to care for another CITE 218. The next individual that can fall under this category is the defendant’s husband, Charley Kones, despite not being the biological father of the child, upon marrying Cynthia he assumed responsibility for her offspring. This can be supported by the case of People v. Carroll were a stepmother was charged with child endangerment for failing to stop he husband from killing his daughter CITE229. The New York Court of Appeals concluded that the stepmother had a duty to care for her husband’s children because “a person who acts as the functional equivalent of a parent in a familial or household setting is … legally responsible for a child’s care” CITE229. The husband

Unfortunately, the laws do not solve the problem but make the parents resent having the courts intervene in their daily family life. She explains how different methods of how a child is raised or how the parent is monitored does not guarantee that the child will not misbehave. Instead of holding the parents responsible, a volunteer mentor should be assigned to children with misbehavior qualities as it will help give the children an independent figure to look up to

When these children’s parents are ripped out of their lives instantaneously without explanation or adequate care, it creates negative effects and occurrences that often go unresolved. Often times these children feel like they are the ones to blame, when in fact it has nothing to do with them at all. There were several instances of victims explaining that they are basically stereotyped as a result of their parent(s) becoming incarcerated—by police,

There were two people and IDCFS who were responsible for Nicolas Zavala’s quality of life. Each of this individual held a percentage of responsibility, some of these deserve more than others. The one who deserves about thirty percent of this responsibility is the mother, Cindy Molina. According to Rick Jervis, from Chicago Tribute, he restates how Cindy Molina had eleven warnings against her according to DCFS. A Few of these warnings was “inadequate supervision” and “risk of harm”. Apart from the warnings from DCSF, Molina had a criminal record, she spent a month in Will County Jail for driving with a suspended license and was battling an alcohol problem.(Jervis, 2004, p.2) The reason why the grandmother is held with twenty percent of responsibility is because she was given custody over Nicolas. Also, Williams was an unfit parent because she failed to attend parental training classes (Jervis, 2004, p.3)

Not all parents can watch their child 24/7 ¨should parents be held accountable¨Parents can't know everything that is going on with their child, they can't read their mind. It is very unlikely parents can read minds. Some parents work ,and kids go to school. Parents don't usually stay with their kids in school. That is why not all parents can watch their children 24/7.

Everyone has priviacy rights it shouldn't matter how young or old you are. In the episode "Arkangel" in the series Black Mirror; we are introduced to Marie and Sara a young mother and daughter. After a losing her child at a park Marie decides to put her child in the "Arkangel" program in hopes of keeping her save as possible. I think Marie should of passed on the program just because one incidente occured dosen't mean it will happen again. Instead of getting the Arkangel program, Marie should have talked to Sara about what happened like every other parent would have, and told her not to wander off alone. The best time for a child to learn right from wrong is when they're young; when their brain is still developing.

The absence of a parent can affect a child in many different ways.One way it can affect a child is by their academics.This could affect them by their academics because they will not have the guidance they need in order to stay on track.The role of a parent is to motivate the child and guide them in the best direction towards life.If they do not have this support they will then be lead into the wrong direction. The wrong direction could mean many things such as teen pregnancy , gang affiliated , dropping out of school , going to jail , being killed.The child will then feel like they do not have anyone to turn to but these options.The girl who would become pregnant as a teen will not feel neglected anymore because she now has her baby.The boy