preview

Leonhart Prohibition Of Marijuana Analysis

Decent Essays

Michele Leonhart the Director of the DEA took a very firm stance on marijuana. When Jared Polis brought up the medical aspects in an attempt to persuade Leonhart, she didn’t budge. Although our government has taken a very constructionist position outlawing marijuana, the DEA takes a very essentialist position when enforcing it. Leonhart was quoted “all illegal drugs are bad,” this shows that until it is legal on the federal level, the DEA will not take a pro-marijuana stance. To the DEA since it is not legal, it therefore has no medical utility. On the other hand a constructionist takes into consideration the social factors that are involved in defining drugs and their use. If Leonhart were to take a constructionist stance, she would take into consideration factors such as, the increasing prison population, and the positive benefits medicinal use, not just the black and white nature of the law. …show more content…

Drug policy has never been truly essentialists and very frequently is just used as a scapegoat for other social issues. This all started with the temperance movement. Temperance according to the Judeo-Christian bible meant moderation, but policy makers turned temperance into the idea of abstinence. With the popularization of distilled liquors, there began to become an awareness of alcohol dependence and abuse. During the industrial revolution large populations of immigrants began moving into cities. High alcohol content, and a growing population lead to more visible alcohol problems. Along with that there was a growing movement towards Nativism. Propaganda was used to help demonize alcohol in the eyes of general society. Post WWI alcohol was viewed, as a way for the German’s to ruin our pure family

Get Access