Let's Arguments Against Abortion

Abortion is a terrible legal thing citizens are aloud to do in America. It is murder to unborn babies who haven't even had a chance to live. It also offends God's creation. Every pregnancy on Earth isn't a mistake, they're is a purpose for every life on Earth and God doesn't want us to destroy them. I don't understand why America is letting people kill their unborn babies, it is a sickening thing to think about. Every woman who gets pregnant is a blessing, unborn babies are not toys they are going to be living things.

After reading the article, “Why It’s Become So Hard to Get an Abortion”, by Margaret Talbot, I am caught in the middle of pro-choice and pro-life. Talbot provides the reader with an even amount of examples explaining the beliefs of each stance. Being raised as a Catholic, my church has always preached to bring an end to abortion. Although, being a young female, I also feel we should have the choice. I think there is a way to respect personal beliefs and religion, while still being in charge of your body. This being said, I don’t agree with the act of taking the life of an innocent human without it being a medical necessity. This brings up another contrasting point, I believe that if the woman seeking the abortion doesn’t have the means to raise

One of the most divisive issues in the country, and the world, today is abortion. Many people believe that women should have unrestricted access to abortions, but others think that it should either be outlawed or that there should be more restrictions put in place. There are many issues with the latter argument, such as it violates human rights, and it creates an ethical dilemma. That being said, there should be less stringent laws in place, in regards to women's access to abortion.

The article reviews that some Jews are pro-choice, it is fully permitted under a number of circumstances to have an abortion. The Torah explains that “the human being is created in God’s image”, meaning even before conception occurs. Jews protect a women’s right to have an abortion only in certain situations, abortion is allowed if the fetus would mean harming the mother or in case of rape. In some cases abortions are just done without a cause. Judaism considers it is a personal choice, each women must be able to decide whether or not to continue a pregnancy based on what is best for the mother. Like any other debate there are two sides to this issue, there is a legal and moral concern. Anyways, in the Jews law you can harm the unborn but

Abortion is widely controversial topic. Whether you are pro-life or pro-choice, it remains a sticky discussion and a hard subject to address. As a social worker we are thought to provide services despite what we may or may not believe. If you are a pro-life life activist, you’re against abortion. You believe that no matter the circumstance, life is important at any stage. If you are pro-choice you believe that circumstances matter and a woman should always have a right to choose. It is my personal belief that life is important at any stage, however you should always have the power to choose and make your own decision based on your specific circumstance. I believe that it’s the individual responsibility to choose their own destiny and not

The day is hot, as the fiery Mississippi sun blazes down on the Earth unforgivingly. The heat is so intense you cannot feel a breeze as you walk. Women sit in folding chairs, fanning themselves with paper fans folded from their anti-abortion pamphlets. Despite the steamy weather the sidewalk is lined with many folding chairs while protesters take time to regain their strength on such a warm day. The protesters spot a woman coming from her older model Chevy caressing her stomach and suddenly the exhausted protesters become as lively as a dog whose owner has come home after several hours at work. They lift their poster with haunting images of dead children, bible quotes, and guilt provoking phrases. Before the woman can come in contact with the protesters ready to pounce,

According to the Constitution, each person is undeniably granted from birth their life, liberty, and property. People have control over their own bodies, and according to the philosophy of liberty, no one can tell them otherwise. The court case, Roe vs. Wade, officially made it possible for women to have abortions, if they chose to do so. Historically, after this proclamation, the death rate of women dying from illegal abortions drastically dipped in thousands. However, because of the constitution's fundamental flexibility and broad interpretation, many clinics in conservative states are closing down, due to restrictions indirectly enforced by anti-abortion groups. In parts of Texas, women have to spend more money on more procedures including

Killing unborn babies by using horrifying procedures isn’t just flat out wrong but also morally wrong. Abortions also can be very damaging to the human body. Thirteen out of 17 studies in the U.S. reported more breast cancer among women who chose abortion. A 1996 meta-analysis of all published reports on the incidence of induced abortion and breast cancer appearing in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health found, on average, a 30% increased risk. Abortion can destroy lives of many helpless innocent children and even in some states is legal. The women of today age in time chooses to advantage and use abortions as a form of some type of birth control. Abortion isn’t just a small matter it’s a great matter it’s the difference in life and death literally. This procedure was legalized in the 1973 Supreme Court cases of Roe vs. Wade, and Doe vs. Boston.

This ongoing debate of abortion has become the phenomenon of all debates today. Since Roe v. Wade 1973, this topic continued to spur divisive conversations, attacks on the abortion clinic, and unfair judgment of women. However, these arguments have progressed into the state laws that use the government health department to expand law enforcement and regulation activities around abortion (Roberts, Fuentes, Berglas, Dennis, 2017). Recently, in the past few years, some states have passed laws, namely Virginia, that forces women to take a medical procedure against their will (Slaughter, 2013). Conversely, since the highlighting of this debate, my allegiance has always been of the support of a woman’s choice and rights, in addition, a woman’s right to control her reproductive process or her body for that matter is not only her right but a human civil right not to be denied by the state (Siegel, 2014). Furthermore, the state government desires to put their thumb on women rights, labeling women as wanting an abortion for an irresponsible reason but just having access to abortion for not to give a reason or seek permission from a panel of doctors (Siegel, 2014).

I am an Evansville native writing on behalf of women in the state of Indiana who will be disproportionately affected by State Representative Curt Nisly’s proposed “Protection at Conception” bill which he intends to bring to the January 2017 General Assembly. I want to acknowledge that I have respect for those who identify as pro-life, as someone who formerly fought to protect the unborn from abortion, it is a set of ideals that I am very familiar with. That being said, I am writing to implore you to take a fervent stand against this complete abortion ban that Representative Nisly is hoping will pass in Indiana.

Although, currently legalized, abortion continues to be a burdening ethical issue in America. From 1973 to 2011 approximately "53 million legal abortions were performed in the United States” (Procon.org, 2015, p.1). Pro-Choice supporters hail an abortion is a woman’s choice and a protected personal right "that should not be limited by governmental or religious authority” (Procon.org, 2015, p.1). However, Pro-Life supporters contend that a human life begins at the very moment of conception and thus an "abortion is the immoral killing of an innocent human being” (Procon.org, 2015, p.1). Thus, there are various arguments to be considered on both sides.

Pro-life people are all the way for life with no exceptions. Unless the woman was raped, victim of incest and if the woman’s life was at risk. However, some pro-life also feel that just because the woman was rape and victim of incest it still does not morally justify abortion. They’re the ones who thinks about the constitutional rights for the viable fetus. It is not right to kill an innocent human being, who should have a birthday instead of a death day. Many people likes to think about the mother and only her rights but what about the child his or her rights, if we don’t fight for them who will? “We can accept that the embryo is a living thing in the fact that it has a beating heart, that it has its own genetic system within it” (Furedi).

In the United States on average, the Center of Disease Control or the CDC, state that an average of 652 hundred thousand abortions are done with legal medical methods in the United States every year, but that's not including the abortions that are not reported and are not done by legal medical methods within the United States. For most people, most would agree that this statistic is an outstanding number, especially to the regards of abortion. And it is statistics like these that would fuel and stir conversations on the subject on whether or not abortions within the United States should be legal and if it is really necessary for women and create very serious arguments and validations from both sides of the spectrum. The reason why this conversation

Abortion has been the most debatable subject of controversy in the United States for a long time. Abortion was legalized in 1973 by the Supreme Court of United States. People who support abortion consider it as pre-choice. Woman has the rights to make decisions that involve her body. On the contrary, people who against abortion consider it as cruel as murder. They think abortion is unethical and immoral. Is that the truth? No, abortion is not just right or wrong, black or white. Woman who choose to have abortion is not immoral, and the person should not be accused morally.

Denying a woman’s right to have an abortion is taking away basic human rights. Abortion is a method that should not be confined by government or religious jurisdiction as it provides a safe means of closure for pregnant women. Taking away one’s right to an abortion creates various unsafe situations, such as pregnant women resorting to illegal or dangerous abortions that may be life threatening (NARAL Pro-Choice America). With the ever growing decrease in the number of abortion clinics in the United States, the number of violent attacks against abortion providers has significantly grown. This is no coincidence, showing that action must be taken in order to fix this ever-growing issue (ProCon.org).