ANASTASIA PROUTSOS
Mr. David Horne
7 Black Lodge Grove
Twin Peaks 19901
Monday 12th September, 2016
Dear Mr. Horne,
Re: File Reference 20/110000 - Mr. David Horne and Mrs. Jane Martell
Thank you for your instructions to act for you in the dispute between you and the defendant. I confirm that you wish us to advise you on the dispute resolution methods available to you in this matter and recommend which method we believe will best meet your interests. Please find below an evaluation of all of the methods available to you and our recommendation, given the nature of the dispute.
Judicial determination, the first of the available methods, is the most formal and follows the rules of evidence and procedure. The parties involved are required to present evidence and arguments for their case to the judicial officer, in compliance with required rules and procedures. The third party (the judicial officer) will ensure all evidence and arguments presented follow the correct rules and procedures and hear all evidence and arguments presented by the involved parties and make a legally binding decision. The third parties involved are experienced legal professionals with expertise in the law, legal processes, and legal disputes, and how to resolve them. The formal nature of the proceedings suits some parties, and there is an element of fairness as both parties are subject to the same rules. Judicial determination, due to associated legal fees and the need to engage legal
I submit this affidavit in support of Claimant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support of Claimant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
in which this decision is made. In some jurisdictions, the cases may be decided upon
Some of the pros of having the religious status around the capitol building would be expressing the religious diversity within the state. It would also be a moral compass for the legislatures. Lastly, it would show that all religions are equal in the eyes of that state. Some of the cons would be two statuses with contradicting religions, like Christianity and Satanism, could end up right beside each other and cause an up roar among the people. Plus, there would never be an end to all the statues that need to be made because there are just too many religions. Finally, the Constitution states to keep religion away from state affairs, so the statues may violate those amendments. If I had to decide a how to resolve the conflict, I would remove the statue of Jesus and try to keep religion away from the government. The other possible solution would to provide statues for every religion.
Thank you for the referral of this matter to our office. I look forward to working with you as we bring this matter to an equitable conclusion for all parties. As always, if you have any questions or comments concerning the above-referenced matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. It is my practice to return all communications within 24 hours, if possible. Please consider this letter a brief Initial File Analysis on this matter.
Adjudication is the administrative equivalent of a judicial trial. Under adjudication, individual cases are heard by law judges within agencies and a body of rules is developed (Kettl, 2015). Adjudication differs from rulemaking in that it applies only to a specific, limited number of parties involved in an individual case before the agency (Vago, 2015). The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) separates adjudication from rulemaking by stating that adjudication is an agency process for the formulation of an order and an order is a final disposition in a matter other than rulemaking. There is formal and informal adjudication. Formal adjudication involves some kind of hearing, whereas informal adjudication takes place in settings that are non-confrontational and often not even face-to-face and is undertaken by non-hearing deciders (Cane, 2009). Adjudications can take many forms, but generally can be grouped into law enforcement adjudications (such as those conducted by the Federal Trade Commission) benefits adjudications (such as those conducted by the Social Security Administration) and licensing and permit adjudications (such as those conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency) (Forte and Spalding,
Conflicts through communication key concepts that I will outline are common ground and adjudication. Common ground is consists of attitudes, values, behaviors, expectations and goals the parties share and can serve as a basis for an agreement (Cahn & Abigail, 2014, p. 258), and adjudication; which is a neutral judge and jury in the legal system hear attorneys who prosecute of defend people and decide a case, which either party may later appeal. (Cahn & Abigail, 2014, p. 249). Though I did not have to experience these two concepts, however, my father had to experience this during his divorce process from his second marriage. The year was 1989 and I was a senior in high school ready for that final bell, so I could get ready for our final football practice before Friday’s game. Over the class loudspeaker was the principal excused himself to
While assessing the wellbeing of a food product and whether it ought to be endorsed, the FDA considers a number of things. The structure and properties of the product is a consideration, the sum that would ordinarily be devoured is something that would be considered, the long haul and wellbeing impacts it could have on consumers, and the different security elements that surrounds the product. The assessment decides a fitting level of utilization that incorporates an inherent wellbeing edge - a variable that takes into consideration vulnerability about the levels of utilization that are relied upon to be innocuous. At the end of the day, the levels of utilization that pick up endorsement are much lower than what might be required
Donna Driver unintentionally ran a red light, and caused a car accident with Vic Victim. Vic sustained severe injuries. Donna’s auto insurance policy with Gekko has liability coverage limit of $100,000.00. Vic’s medical bills alone run close to that, and there’s also his loss of work and pain & suffering to be taken into account. Vic wants to settle the entire case for $100,000.00, and Donna pleads with Gekko to do so since it is obvious that he could recover more than that based on the facts of this case. Gekko tells her that they will only offer $50,000.00, and if it’s not accepted, they will take their chances at trial.
You have asked be to review your file in the above-mentioned matter. Moreover, you have asked me to review the mediation binder in a substantially similar case involving the same insured that is named as a defendant in the litigation at issue here. Upon reviewing these materials, you have instructed me to have a conversation with you about preparing additional reservation of rights letters, and how to proceed going forward.
Mediation was created to help parties compromise when they have a conflict or dispute. It was designed so that the parties involved are able to settle there legal issues without having to go to court. Mediation is most effective when the problem is small and between two parties, it is growing in fields such as family law, and is a popular form of resolution between landlords and tenants. Mediation is an effective form of dispute resolution for three reasons, the courts are sometimes too busy with cases and this will eliminate that process, there are no overwhelming lawyer fees, and it supports a mutual satisfaction between the two parties.
Jack and Jill, residents of Orlando, FL, had a nasty incident involving a hill, some water and a broken crown, in which both parties got hurt. Jack and Jill ended up suing each other in Florida state court. After a few months of nasty motion practice, Jill comes to your office and tells you that she's heard of this wonderful thing called mediation, under which she and Jack could be helped to reach a settlement. She has a few questions for you about mediation, all under Florida law:
This essay will provide a detailed examination of what Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is, particularly mediation, the various techniques of ADR, the advantages and disadvantages of ADR; and whether or not courts should have the authority to compel individuals into undertaking mediation or other forms of ADR. This essay argues against courts having the power to compel litigants into mediation but may be afforded powers to encourage parties to go through mediation at first instance. This essay will base its arguments on whether courts should compel civil litigants to follow the ADR route upon the perceived advantages of ADR and its success rate. The contention of this essay is not that mediation is inappropriately used to settle
the evidence and arguments, who makes the decision on the basis of an application of the law to the
Alternative Dispute Resolution or ADR refers to a number of various processes that can be used to resolve legal disputes other than by litigation. Recently, methods of dispute resolution which focus on arbitration, mediation and negotiation as an alternative to adjudication have gained notoriety. This notoriety may have been caused by the public perception that ADR methods are less expensive, more efficient, and more satisfactory than the normal traditional course of litigation. The goals of establishing these processes to resolve disputes as an alternative to more formal legal processes include: 1) to make the regular court system more efficient, less costly and more responsive to the needs of the litigants;
Service is the most important aspect when it comes to handling a hotel. A hotel’s main objective is to provide the best service and tend to all of the guests’ needs and requirements. If there is no service then there would be no business. When running a business, the costumer is always placed first. Poor services can results in a complaint from a guest. But that complaint can be used to better the business in the future.