Life expectancy for all Americans rose from 68.2 years in 1950 to 77.9 years in 2007. Many scientists and people are debating over the cause of this but I believe this to be the cause of social advancements. Due to logical reasoning, medical advancements, and a surplus of resources, social advancements are clearly the cause of life expectancy increases. When life expectancy is brought up the three major factors are social, environmental, and economic reasons. Environmental factors are absurd. A huge debate of 2017 is climate change with the whole world backing the Paris Climate Agreement and the United States backing out. Because 97% of scientists agree that climate change is a thing (99% if you include scientists that haven’t published …show more content…
Many disorders and conditions that could not be treated in the past are now treatable and because of this life expectancy has increased. In addition, people of the United States have put together many movements to contribute financially to research of many illnesses. With our increased ability to prevent and understand new diseases comes greater life expectancy. Resources have become plentiful in the U.S.. With increases population, more and more people go into every occupation every day. This results in resources of every kind being pumped into our society. These types of increases have a direct correlation to life expectancy increases. In conclusion, economic and environmental factors play little to no factor in life expectancy increases. Societal growth has resulted in unnatural life expectancy increases and exceptionally high population count. Eventually resources will become to thin for our population and life expectancy will go down and global population will decrease. However, scientific advancements in medicine will continue to occur. There has never been a time in human history where population is this large and medical advancements have gone this far. It will be interesting to see how the world copes with the
Life expectancy is defined by Aldwin and Gilmer (2013) as “the average number of years a person in a particular cohort can expect to live. In the 1900, people did not die of heart disease or cancer, but from infectious diseases. Causes of death for many people began to change from infectious diseases to chronic diseases in the 1930s due to treatments for infections becoming available. Living longer may be good to some, however, for many people living longer may result in age-related disorders. “Chronic disease such as arthritis, diabetes, osteoporosis, hypertension, arteriosclerosis, congestive heart disease, and disorders have replaced the acute diseases of years ago. In general, chronic diseases are not curable, and the main goal of treatment is management of the illness to decrease its rate of progression and, therefore, limit disability (Aldwin and Gilmer, 2013). With this being said, many people are living a longer life, but have a decrease in quality of life due to age related complications that did not exists 100 years ago (Aldwin and Gilmer, 2013).
From looking at the graph above I can predicted that in the next 26 years the life expectancy is going to increase. The reason for this is because there will be better technology around. People will start to know more about their health, meaning they will know what to do if they become sick. The hospitals will have better equipment which will mean that people will get better quickly. This will also mean that the machines that were used 10-20 years ago would not have been as strong as it will be now and over the next 26 years. There will be more advertisements on TV on how to have a healthy diet which will be helpful to a lot of people.
Since 1900 the life expectancy has doubled at over 70 years old and it is continually growing (Our World In Data 2016). Many people ask whether life expectancy would impact people by there being less availability to food on this over populated Earth. Estimators say that the overpopulation of Earth is on average 8 billion people. We are already at a population of 7.3 billion. This shows that Earth is only so big and we are quickly outgrowing it if something is not done. This is important because it shows how radical life extension could drastically affect the human population, maybe even over the Earth 's ability to
The primary reason for the vast increase in life expectancy in developed countries in the 20th century is universal clean drinking water and very high level of public and personal hygiene. These two improvements account for probably 80%of the life expectancy. Overall life
With the help of technology, humans are easily able to defend themselves from animals they see, while around one million years ago, many humans died easily to the abundant predators ruling the world. Today, humans also have less ways to die. Back then, people could die easily from being starved, being mauled by animals, and being killed by other human tribes. Today, with law enforcement and abundance in supplies these ways to die are very rare. On million years ago, hunter-gatherers died at an average age of thirty-years-old, but today, humans mostly died at age seventy-two. Because technology is expected to advance, so will life expectancy.
Life expectancy, or the estimated years of life for a person or group of people, has increased over the years but it is still surprisingly lower than expected in places such as the United States. America ranks twenty-fourth on the life expectancy list under Japan, Australia, France Spain and Italy. What causes this disparity in the ranking and statistics in an advanced industrialized society such as the United States? There are major statistical factors that influence the United States ranking in world life expectancy, involving education level, poverty, race and gender. The diverse groups of people living in the United States affect the health statistics negatively, bringing in influences from education and income levels, race and
The advancement of health and medicine, life expectancy rates increased among all races. Although, Midlife white Americans has seen an incline of deaths. Increase mortality and morbidity among white non-Hispanics 45-54.
The U.S. Census Bureau (2011) states that Americans are living longer and life expectancy rose to 78.8 years in 2011. Once reaching age 65, one can expect to live 17 years more for all race/sex groups. Statistics indicate that women usually out live men by 5.5 years. The elderly populations will more than double between now and the year 2050, to 80 million. By 2050, the surviving baby boomers will be over the age of 85 (U.S. Census Bureau,
In the United States, life expectancy is consequently low compare to that of other countries. Many ask how the United States, being considered a high income country, is behind world countries in life expectancy. As research is being done, it is known that one of the main reasons why life expectancy is low here in the U.S has to do with bad health, such as diabetes.
Life expectancy is the average number of years an individual is expected to live in a certain area/state/region. The Medical Daily reports that life expectancy is continuing to increase throughout the world, a sure sign of good news. However, it also reports that diabetes and depression are slowly on the global rise.
The United States has experienced considerable gains in life expectancy in the past century thanks to a combination of medical and social innovations. This ever-growing aging population increases the public health challenges of curbing health and long-term care costs and minimizing the burden of disease and disability.
The life in the U.S compared to that of the Soviet Union during the 60’s is an amazing phenomenon of a declining life expectancy in a highly developed country just like in the case of the Soviet Union during the 60’s down to the 70’s. The result of the life expectancy rate in the Soviet Union shows that there is only a small part to true informal changes in the state of living. However, the weak point of the measures of life expectancy is of vital importance, although another factor is the unfavourable selection of risks by war, thereby making a less valuable comparison between the international and inter temporal. Another factor is the logical difference between period and the measurement of the group of people sharing a common factor
When discussing changing demographics, the author states "Last year, 4 million people in the United States were over the age of 85 … By 2020, the Census Bureau estimates that 7 million to 8 million people will be over age 85" ("A Brief History of Universal Design" 6). I found this stat remarkable; with societal advances our nation will over double the amount of people reaching age 85. I would ask the author if this feat is all due to changes in medicine, sanitation, and diet or if our average lifespan can advance naturally as time progresses.
“ We are living longer and healthier” state World Health Organization ( WHO) and all world organizations. Population health is becoming better all over the world and therefore people everywhere are living longer.
The average life expectancy of man and women in today's modern world, is signfnicnatly longer than it used to be. For example back in the early 1900s the avergae life expectany of a male lvng in the US was 46.3 while the average lifie eexpectancy of a US based female was 48.3. As it currently stands the average life extapecnty of a US male is now at 73.8 and 79.5 years for women. The fact that people are living longer is pramirly due to the fact that the medical communtiy has become awae of the all the essentialy minerals and vitmains our body needs to systain itself. As such, unlike before where an indiaul may have died as a result of an inablitiy to purchase fruits and nutrents, we are now in a society whwere we can utilze supplm,ents to