Literature has no set definition, mainly because throughout history writers, as well as literary historians have failed to construct an agreeable definition (Bressler 12). When one thinks of literature, he or she should think of literary criticism—different critical perspectives. Literary criticism requires readers to analyze literary texts with knowledge of theories. Thus, the next time one reads a text, he or she should first identify the theory that he or she plans to use. The theories represent a set of critical lens that one will use to analyze the text critically. For instance, this paper will focus on the New Criticism theory; it is a theory that requires readers to focus entirely on the text itself. Readers do not need to focus on …show more content…
From a New Critic perspective, when analyzing a poem, it is pivotal for readers to pay close attention to the poem’s structure and form, especially since it can help him or her understand the poem’s overall meaning.
In life, human beings will encounter many challenging obstacles throughout his or her long and stressful journey here on earth, especially since success is the ultimate goal that he or she wishes to achieve. In the first quatrain of Angelou’s poem, a simile is depicted: “You may trod me in the very dirt / But still, like dust, I’ll rise” (3-4). Here, it is evident that Angelou wants readers to realize that life will step on he or she as if him or her is a pile of dirt; however, if he or she is determined to overcome his or her challenges, he or she will rise—just like dust. The simile depicted in quatrain one, forces readers, from a New Critic viewpoint, to realize that the essential meaning of Angelou’s poem lies within each line of the poem—objective meaning.
Furthermore, in life, human beings will encounter different individuals—exposure to diversity. Human beings learn from one another; however, certain people tend to encounter human beings who are miserable with his or her life. In fact, people who feel dejected tend to not motivate others to achieve his or her lifelong goals—this is portrayed in quatrain six of Angelou’s poem: “You may kill me with your hatefulness, / But still, like air, I’ll rise” (23-24). Here, Angelou uses a
Through her narrative structure, Angelou aspires for young black students to maintain “Negro” pride and strong ambition. Her essay is built on a foundation of intertwined objective and subjective narration which follows chronological order. It commences with Angelou
Angelou’s example of overcoming adversity is the strongest at the end of the essay. “Something unrehearsed, unplanned, was going to happen, and we were going to be made to look bad” (Angelou 26). As she is sitting there as a young girl at her graduation, she can feel the unwelcoming presence of the speaker’s words and actions. Before the speaker begins his political rant of what he has brought to the white community, Angelou anticipates that the graduating class is going to be shamed. Angelou believes the speaker’s words, and starts to doubt her hopes and dreams. “The man’s dead words fell like bricks around the auditorium and too many settled in my belly” (Angelou 28). As Henry Reed starts to sing the Negro national anthem, Angelou finally senses that the words do have meaning to her. Nearly every event that Angelou mentions in her autobiography has one of two different aims. The aim she uses in this essay is how she faces obstacles, overcomes them, and
Angelou depicts her strength into fighting for racial equality and sexism. The repetition of the anaphora “Still I rise” and “I rise” makes the words stronger and accentuates Angelou’s message of staying strong and keep fight for equality. Consequently, we feel pride for her strength and respect for her actions. The metaphors of “oil wells”, “gold mines” and “diamonds” represent how valuable Angelou distinguishes herself to be and is proud of herself, she is worth just as much as everyone else hence she deserves respect and love alike others. We feel respect for her great accomplishments.
This essay originally titled Studying Literature in Grade 12, has an abundance of information regarding and convincing the readers that the grade twelve English course should be composed of Canadian literature. The grammar in this essay however, was weak. The subject did not agree to their pronouns, making many sentences awkward. Overall, improvements could have been made. Some of these include MLA format, the title, introduction paragraph, grammar, punctuation and the citation format.
Maya Angelou employs similes to demonstrate how she will not hurt because of others’ opinions about her. In the first stanza, she says, “You may trod me in the very dirt, / But still, like dust, I'll rise” to make her oppressors know she is confident with herself (3-4). Angelou utilizes a simile to compare herself to dirt and then dust, the dirt represents how her oppressors include her in the lowest class,which has no power, while the dust symbolizes her potential. With this comparison, Angelou makes the reader know she is a strong person and cannot be put down easily, she does not care what others think about her. Maya also mentions, “Cause I laugh like I've got gold mines/Diggin’ in my own backyard”(19). This simile compares her laugh to gold mines. Gold mines usually represent being rich or having a lot of money, so here Angelou says she doesn't need to be rich to be happy because of what she has is enough.
The ballad still I rise is composed by Maya Angelou; an African American writer, instructor and social liberties extremist. The ballad's strict importance is a snide reaction towards the general population who look down on the speaker. To the storyteller, the sonnet figuratively depicts her quality to dependably survive the fight against individuals' feedback of her and her predecessors. All around, this ballad conveys the message of the human's fantastic quality and capacity to defeat hurt. In any case, the fundamental and most essential message this ballad gives is the storyteller's quality to counter against separation of races and sexual orientation; which offers seek after other people who experience the ill effects of a similar difficulty.
“The fight that is life” is the common theme represented in all three of the following poems, “Do not go gentle into that good night” by Dylan Thomas, “I know why the caged bird sings” by Maya Angelou and “Invictus” by William Ernest Henley. This essay will analyze these three poems in detail to find similarities and differences between them. The three aforementioned poems seem to have more differences than similarities between them. Such as in “I know why the caged bird sings,” which is about a bird that longs for a better life, whereas in “Invictus” which brings forth the idea of the author being “the master of his fate.” The poem “Do not go gentle into that good night” is about never giving up on living; the poem “Invictus” is about giving life his best shot. In “Do not go gentle into that good night” the main idea is living the best life that he could; in “I know why the caged bird sings” the main idea is the longing to live a better life. In the poem “I know why the caged bird sings” the author uses birds as the characters; both “Do not go gentle into that good night” and “Invictus” depict the characters as humans. All of these poems differ in certain ways, but they share similar underlying elements such as never give up and try to do the most in life with what is already there. These poems are separated by period, structure, and condition, but they all share prominent similarities as well as communicate the common idea of “the fight that is life.” My favorite
Some could argue that situations, facts, and conditions can create and develop what most would call a lost cause. Angelou would disagree. In her autobiography her major theme is her best argument; Circumstance does not dictate future success, rather it’s the drive and passion of an individual that
Literary modernism was a reaction against realism, which was developed to depict real rural life (Campbell, 2017). As people began to relocate to city areas, many writers and artist took to redefining the meaning of a realistic life. It was believed that one way of life no longer fit for everyone and modernism introduced literature and art that began to question and show various perspectives of life. Peter Childs explains that “modernist writing “plunges” the reader into a confusing and difficult mental landscape which cannot be immediately understood…” (Childs 15). Uncommon poetry and prose stemmed from this modernist development. A popular one being Nella Larsen’s Passing, which encompasses two African American women who are particularly fair skinned and can both “pass” a white. The novel follows the troubles faced when denying one’s race and embracing it during the early twentieth century. Passing embraces the modernist ideas provided by Peter Childs by revealing the uncertain landscape of life through identity, sexuality, and family of mixed women and challenges it through the style of prose.
“Still I Rise”, written by African-American writer Maya Angelou, includes a character who rises “Up from a past that’s rooted in pain.” No matter what words are said against her, lies are told about her, threats are made towards her, or words are written against her, she takes the past and uses it to fuel her confidence. The way she writes creates a deep sense of pride and feeling, while giving the poem life and helping the audience realise that they, too can rise. The diction, literary devices, and theme help the speaker portray her feelings about the topic of oppression in her experience.
‘Still I Rise’ was written by an Afro-American poet Maya Angelou and consists of a mixture of tones, such as: playful, angry, comical and bitter. Slavery was long abolished but Angelou saw its effects on society and black people. In this poem she declares that no hatefulness of society will determine her success. In the poem ‘Still I Rise’ she is not only proclaiming her triumph but also calls others to stand up for themselves and live against society’s expectations.
In “An Introduction to Literature, Criticism and Theory” Bennett and Royle, explore topics such as subjectivity and ideology. In the Chapters “Me” and Ideology”, Bennett and Royle are able to define the terms as well as suggest how they are interrelated or interconnected. Bennett and Royle contend that literature replicates structures of ideology while encouraging subjects to question personal idenitity. They believe “subjects – people – make their own ideology at the same time as ideology makes them subjects” (Bennett and Royle 202). Stevens exemplifies Bennett and Royles contentions by building his ideologies around his profession as a bulter at the risk of losing himself to the subjection of his ideologies in which he can never be alone and cannot exist without his profession or the justications of his profession.
Literary Criticism: “Through the Tunnel” When is a risk worth taking? In “Through the Tunnel,” by Doris Lessing, Jerry takes a risk where he could have died. He was motivated by his need to be independant. Jerry takes the risk to prove to himself that he is capable of unimaginable things.
Oftentimes, examining a piece of literature art can be troublesome— what insightful discovery is the author trying to reveal? Is there a deeper, more profound truth to the on-the-surface details provided? Is there a truth at all? To New Historicists, the “truth” of a past or foreign culture can never be confirmed as established or unchangeable. At best, any understanding of the “truth” is a matter of interpretation based on both the reader and the writer. Additionally, while the literary work under consideration does indeed reflect the culture in which it was written, it also participates in the culture in which it was written. In this complex level of historical perspective, culture and literature
“Still I rise” the poem by Maya Angelou brings such a powerful message, and a unfamiliar characteristic to Maya. This poem perceives Maya as confident, sexy, and having self respect. Maya personality shares that others destructive and hateful acts should not ruin someone's self respect, self esteem, and self worth. She reveals that discriminators and haters have a destructive craving to destroy others pride, and view of themselves. In this poem she shows emphasis on the phrase