Economic globalization has been praised to be the savior of global inequality. However, at the same time, the tremendous development of developing countries like China accounts for global economy growth, compensating for other countries’ loss in this redistribution of money and resources. Although both involved in economic globalization, China has driven over 650 million people out of poverty, while South Africa suffers a 2.3 percent increase in poverty rate. Indeed, distinctive internal factors prevent countries from growing at the same pace, but such imbalance is now hampering reduction in global income inequality, which urges us to reaccelerate this process. Talking about globalization in a business perspective, international businesses globalize their brands by expanding to foreign markets. And they always prioritize localization when they enter a new market, having appropriate translated names and tweaking their core services to generate profit. Localization has been so helpful in the business world that local governments should also be inspired, for example, adjusting globalization activities locally through domestic trade policies. Glocalization, as stated by sociologist Roland Robertson, is “the simultaneity – the co-presence – of both universalizing and particularizing tendencies.” Given the current disparity among countries’ economic development through globalization, local governments should adopt the business model of glocalization in order to maximize national
Globalization can be seen as reduction in barriers between countries. Globalization has opened the world market for international trade. The movement of globalization have contributed to the spread of knowledge, culture, technology, and information across borders. The increasing role international expansion across border has also increased the focus of multinational corporations to international business strategies. Organizations today in developed nation or in developing nation are going international due to increase in competition. They want to expand their limits beyond local region. Competition in domestic market and pressure to expand the business are the few reasons for the globalization. The following are the few
For individuals in very poor and economically unstable countries, globalization tends to do more harm than good. Through the economic, political and cultural examples stated above, globalization has not aided these countries climb out of poverty, develop an influential government or have a strong cultural identity, in fact, it has done the exact opposite. L’Huillier quotes Charles Darwin, “if the misery of our poor be caused not by the laws of nature, but by out institution, great is our sin” (2017 381). The business model that globalization suggests is an unattainable utopia for those in developing countries. These traits of poverty and war have always existed yet, many of today’s countries are the way they are because of the models that are favored and paraded under globalization
Globalization is not a unique phenomenon in the 21st century. What is unique about our experience of globalization, though, is the accelerated speed in which globalization has propagated. At a dizzying speed, globalization has left parts of the world more affluent than ever whereas other parts of the world are still swept in vertigo, unable to fully garner the benefits it offers. Despite current polarized experiences and the tradeoff between domestic politics and globalization, the overall results have been sweepingly positive as globalization increases equality and catalyzes the economic development when combined with the active roles of the states in creating the institutional practices conducive for growth.
Many different contexts group together to make up the term “globalization” such as: technology, trade, offshoring, outsourcing integration, migration, transportation, and environmental pollution. In plain terms, globalization can be described as a process that embraces economic and cultural transmissions between countries. This process is intended to improve the function of economic activities worldwide. The movement also supports the idea of internationalism. Influencing a nation to adopt new political views and educational values can be a potentially positive way to help a struggling nation develop. However, economic improvement in this situation is not always the case. Research provides an irregular pattern concerning economic development. Focusing in on the impact of globalization in South Africa, both positives and negatives have played a part in this country’s struggle to compete with the rest of the world.
Brune, Nancy, and Geoffrey Garrett. "THE GLOBALIZATION RORSCHACH TEST: International Economic Integration, Inequality, and the Role of Government." Annual Review of Political Science 8.1 (2005): 399-423. Web.
During the last decade of the twentieth century, the word ‘globalization’ has become an increasingly prominent feature of political, social, and economic discussion in academic and policymaking circles, as well as in the media. The processes and outcomes of globalization drew attention and debates that had one thing in common. The research shows that nearly everyone agrees that globalization is a trend that is changing the face of the world, and as a result the world society lives in a more ‘globalized’ world. Nearly two and a half decades passed since 1990s, and studies have been conducted to examine the causes and consequences of globalization. Moreover, nearly every person experiences some type of globalization and can testify firsthand the effects it has on their life, society, and the state. The analysis of the effects that globalization dynamics have on the world society indicates that globalization has a significant positive impact via spreading opportunities and wealth across nations, stimulating innovation and productivity, enhancing the economic development of poorer countries, and helping to improve living standards.
1). Choose a current issue as it relates to any one topic we have covered over the course of the semester to explore cross-cultural variations in culture change as it relates to globalization. What is your issue? How does this issue relate to any one topic we have covered over the course of the semester?
The theory of globalization today is a field of intensive debate as the efforts towards defining globalization most often highlight its individual aspects. According to Held and McGrew (1999), “globalisation is an idea whose time has come, yet it lacks precise definition”. Despite the ambiguity of the term “globalisation,” the use of the term, according to Held and McGrew, reflects increased interconnectedness in political, economic and cultural matters across the world creating a shared social space. Given this inter-connectedness, globalisation may be defined as: “a process which embodies a transformation in the spatial organisation of social relations and
Economic globalization has been a crucial role and a very commonly discussed issue in today’s world. As explained in the book “International Business”, the term economic globalization means increasing economic interdependence of national, regional and local economies across the world through acceleration of cross-border movements of goods, services, technology, and capital (Joshi). Many people’s first impression of economic globalization would be the significant economic growth and higher living standards it creates, especially in East Asian developing countries. Recently, a heated conversation about economic globalization centers around its effectiveness in reducing worldwide poverty. Economic globalization has shown an unprecedented
Abstract This paper argues that the alleged process of globalisation should be recast as a process of ‘glocalisation’. ‘Glocalisation’ refers to the twin process whereby, firstly, institutional/regulatory arrangements shift from the national scale both upwards to supra-national or global scales and downwards to the scale of the individual body or to local, urban or regional configurations and, secondly, economic activities and inter-firm networks are becoming simultaneously more localised/regionalised and transnational. In particular, attention will be paid to the political and economic dynamics of this geographical rescaling and its
Find one example each of homogenisation, polarisation, and glocalisation (images can be used if available). Briefly define each concept, describe the specific example, and how it demonstrates the concept. Summarise with one paragraph on how you see the three concepts relating to globalisation. (4 paragraphs total).
Globalization is happening at the expense of social, environmental and employment developments, and is causing rising inequality for the majority of the earth. Localization, on the other hand, is a process that rearranges the trend of globalization by distinguishing the local and focusing more on the community. The policies bringing about localization are those which increase community cohesion, a reduction in poverty and inequality, and an improvement in livelihoods, social infrastructure and environmental protection, and a sense of security. On another level, there are troubling signs. That's because of a remarkable, but not surprising lack of equality in the benefits of globalization. While living standards have improved in many parts of the developing world, a new set of pressure is bearing down on the countries of the underdeveloped world.
There are many ways to look at and understand modern globalization. In general terms, globalization means that the world, as a whole, is leading to a more utopian society, meaning that the globe is become very interconnected and similarities are growing between different regions and cultures of the world. Globalization is a phenomenon that has been evolving since before 10,000 B.C. This constant evolution can cause many problems, but it can also solve many issues positively as well. Development of any country, however, seems to be a key issue when discussing globalization. Globalization and development present two different factors in the world today. Many countries are lacking in their own development while the world around them is becoming more developed and globalized. Globalization hinders development because with globalization, less developed countries depend on more developed countries to help them to sustainability and self-reliance.
We live in a vastly different age from the one our parents or grandparents grew up in. Economies are immensely more complex, the youth have superlative access to information, and countries are able to interact with each other within seconds. A particular domain witnessing extreme change, in the recent era,w is the economical and commercial exchange between nations. Today, around one-third of trade occurs internationally. For example, online retailer Amazon has an annual revenue greater than the Gross Domestic Product of half of every nation in the world (McIntyre). Meanwhile, gross U.S. assets held by foreigners toward the end of 2006 amounted to $16.3 trillion. The world’s gross average output is reaching astonishing heights. As
Determining the precise costs and benefits of both globalization and localization can be difficult. The difficult part is deciding which has the most beneficial or disturbing affect upon a country. If a country implements either theory - the outcomes will vary depending on the actions taken to implement them. Granted if the wrong concept is attempted in the wrong country, the affects it will have in the long run can be extremely harmful to the citizens of the country and all of its aspects. And in the other hand, if the correct concept is implemented, then the country can enjoy and learn new attributions added to their culture. It can be very difficult to determine exactly which concept is better, in what situation. Through out this