12/10/!7
Jocelyn Magdaleno
2nd&3rd Period
Growing Pains of Government
Through the course of United States history, the country has had to process through the establishment of how to function as a unified group. Post the Revolutionary War, men came together to refine what they saw as the best course of action in keeping their independence whole. Similarly, in the novel, Lord of the Flies by William Golding, a group of boys were left to survive after their plane crashed. Without the control of adults, the boys created their own establishment of rules and expectations. The growing pains that both the United States and boys in Lord of the Flies underwent shared many comparative features. This response will seek to evaluate the growing pains and how they shaped what we know to be true today. These two interesting stories that tragic parts of the story, have many similar things and different things with each other. Let us start off with the many things they have in common with each other, in my opinion, these two were made to have a place to speak. “The Lord of the Flies” had many group discussions about the leaders and rules that everyone must obey. The constitution has many cons of the situations they had back then, like, Limited Rights for Non-White Men to vote, No General Taxation, two out of three supporters needed to pass a law, and the representatives per state population was varied. Those were a few listed things that weren't the best decisions . As well of
William Golding represents the role of government and creating the constitution in his novel, “Lord of the Flies”. A story about a group of children stranded on an island struggling to survive. In order to do so, they create their own government to survive and hold everything together. Although this novel explains society, government and creating the constitution, it also has many differences.
Similar to most literary classics, William Golding’s novel Lord of the Flies contains allusions to the Christian Bible and character archetypes that convey universal ideas. Golding’s story focuses on a group of British schoolboys who are stranded on an island and ultimately succumb to their innate savage tendencies. Literary analysts often compare components of Lord of the Flies to various aspects in the Christian Bible. For instance, the setting in Lord of the Flies is often linked to the Garden of Eden, and some characters are thought to have religious-inspired names. Critics believe Simon’s name originates from Jesus Christ’s disciple, Peter, whose name was originally Simon. Biblical allusions exist throughout the novel associated with
Have you ever been on a beach and seen a conch shell and wondered if someone in time used this for civilization? Or even to show leadership? Well if you haven’t, then for sure you will be amazed! In the novel Lord of the Flies, the author William Golding specifically focuses on how a group of children ends up on an unknown island without rules and order in which they become savages and nearly act similarly to animals in one way or another. One symbol in this novel is the conch shell. The conch shell in Lord of the Flies represents leadership and civilization, in which allows Ralph, the leader of the group, to call meetings to order and gives the chance for others to speak; however, it becomes worthless and loses its importance as the story progresses and is shattered at the end, showing how without respect and authority things can lead to savagery.
The Lord of the Flies conveys many of the strenuous hardships that the children faced working together to meet a common goal of getting rescued; yet they’ve had many disputes along their relentless journey because each of them has their own perspectives and priorities. One of the three of the essential complications the children had, was knowing how to be an exceptional, efficient leader or chief that was well respected. Also the other dispute they had faced, is accepting each others differences and coming to an agreeable compromise. One of the last dilemmas they faced, was trying to work together to create their own society and government, while they were trying to build their very own civilization. Although the children do have their own differences and deal with problematic troubles, they will begin to understand what the responsibilities of a leader will consist of.
Throughout history, the way humans think has fascinated philosophers. One of the many recurring themes in human thinking is in regards to power: how we govern ourselves. Ideas of where this power should be placed vary from concepts such as Democracy to Republicanism to Socialism. However, the ‘where’ and ‘how’ of government has many opinions surrounding it, and these varying opinions often cause discontent and conflict. When humans are crossed with a conflict over the source of power in society, it is not out of the ordinary for a war or split to occur. The Lord of the Flies is not an exception to this rule of thumb. Written by William Golding, the book explores what occurs when a group of boys is left unsupervised to create
How does being stranded on a remote island sparsely populated with young boys who trying desperately to establish and maintain order reflect our society? In fact, William Golding holds important messages for the reader about how the purpose and peril of government remain relevant as metaphors of modern politics. Today, government substantially influences our lives in many aspects for the better or in some instances for the worse. In Lord of the Flies methods of control, propaganda, along with opposing militant governmental ideologies instill fear upon the boys which eventually lead to their downfall. Military dictatorship is a form of government wherein the political power resides with the military.
“Which is better--to have laws and agree, or to hunt and kill?” (Golding 180). This quote, uttered by Piggy during a last ditch effort to heal severed ties among the boys of the island, is the epitome of the struggle that humans have had to face for perpetuity while attempting to find the ideal system in which to regulate a body of people. British novelist William Golding, author of Lord of the Flies, beautifully chronicles the differing governing structures of both democracy and anarchy. Throughout the duration of the story, the beneficial sides, as well as the pitfalls of each authoritative method, are revealed through the various consequences that result from the decisions made. While both the democratic and anarchic governing styles were employed by the misplaced island refugees, the democracy style of management was built around the basis of structure and order while the anarchy approach to regulation lacked any form of organization or discipline. As both forms of government were showcased amid the same congregation of boys, many contrasting ideas and beliefs between the two became immensely distinguishable. Some of the disparities of the systems that are exhibited through the course of the book include varying rationale used in decision making, the contrasting character the leaders of each movement possessed, as well as divergent symbols that represent each methodology.
There are certain traits in individuals that seem to be passed down from generation to generation and, regardless of the number of studies and discoveries established, they have a way of showing up in our environments. In William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, a group of schoolboys find themselves stranded on an island and in a series of events, their behavior is altered and they become very malicious. It is questionable whether the reason for this alteration in their behavior is due to their circumstances or to their human nature. It is most probable that both of these options played a part in the boys’ immoral decisions but stronger evidence supports that their behavior was situational. Stanley Milgram dedicated himself to study behavior, bringing forth results that indicated that the majority of people will behave unethically when they are in a situation that calls for it. Relating this to Lord of the Flies, one is able to see the influence that Jack had over the other boys towards the end of the novel and this is an interesting concept to explore.
When William Golding published his highly controversial novel Lord of the Flies, the horrors and tragedies he described were shocking for people to read. However, the of the worst crimes committed, as well as the acts of leadership, have more of a relation to the events happening around the readers than they may realize. In Golding’s novel, Lord of the Flies, the differences between boys and men, evil and innocence, and right and wrong are discussed as a group of boys are stranded on an island. There are no adults present, which essentially means there are no rules. Using their still civilized ways at the beginning of the book, they decide to elect a leader. This begins the struggle for power between two
Alexander Hamilton once stated, “The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for among old parchments or musty records. They are written, as with a sunbeam, in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of the divinity itself; and can never be erased”. In 1954 William Golding Published the novel Lord of the Flies in order to get a deeper look into the flaws of society that are related to the flaws of human nature. During WWII a group of British school boy were being transported by plane but the plane was shot down killing the pilot and leaving a group of boys on an island where there is no adult supervision. Today our topic will be focusing on the pessimistic views of human nature that are presented
Someone’s dead, bloods been shed, and people are being hunted one by one. In most horror stories, the next step would be finding out who the murder is, and how to either stop it or get away from it. But in this story, the murderers are already given and how they killed the others are revealed. So what’s the use of these scenes of violence? In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, several boys ranging six to thirteen are stranded on an island after the plane they were aboard on crashed. They all survived except the pilot, so they’re all alone with no adults to supervise them. How lucky! Or is it? As they band together to kept order and survive on the island, things get out of hand and blood is shed. The boy’s
Countries around the world strive to have order within their nation. This can never happen as some humans ruin this order. Killing, destruction, and war; all of these ruin the order that is trying to be established. William Golding, a famous writer in the 1980’s, created “The Lord of the Flies” to explain to the reader the idea of order within the human race. If you continue reading, Golding also shows how that order lasts only for a small time until a person turns that order to chaos. Chaos isn 't always expected to happen and/or is not intended; but it always finds its way through one way or another. The novel explains order to chaos magnificently through the book’s characters, symbols, and events. The paragraphs below will demonstrate how these were portrayed.
Sir William Gerald Golding (1911-1993), a British novelist, a playwright and poet. A novel winning and booker prize winning author. Golding is best known for his novel, Lord of the Flies and his other works including, To the Ends of the Earth. Golding also won the James Tait Black Memorial Prize during 1979. Golding was also a part of the World War II and joined the Royal Navy in 1940. Golding’s writing continues to touch every country in the world and is read in more than 35 languages. Many of his attempts at other works are still endured in manuscripts or typescript. ‘Words may, through the devotion, the skill, the passion and the luck of writers, prove to be the most powerful thing in the world’- William Golding, Nobel Lecture,
The book Lord of the Flies has been a beacon for students who study the behavior of mankind. But in the first few chapters of the novel, readers will begin to notice different types of political changes within the group of lost boys. A democracy arises when all the boys vote for a leader, who ends up to be Ralph because he is the oldest. After he is voted, Ralph sees the slight resentment that Jack holds towards him because of his own choir group that he led. Attempting to withdraw from any confrontations, Ralph appoints Jack as his second in command. From this point, the story begins to slowly transition from a democracy into a dictatorship.
Human nature brought to light many philosophical queries; one major one is the question: what components does a government need in order to effectively coincide and last along side humans? Forced to answer this question on their own, a group of boys, stranded on an island in William Golding’s classic novel Lord of the Flies, elect Ralph, a young and energetic male who brought the boys together, to be their leader, instead of Jack, a boy who disregards other’s ideas and views his ideas as the best. The boys, especially a well-educated lad named Piggy, try their best to give everyone an equal status on the island; however, their society inevitably collapses because of the fact that the boys have no effective system for preventing power-hungry figures from obtaining too much power and leading their society down a path of failure. When differentiating the actions taken by the boys to the political theories of French Enlightenment thinker Baron de Montesquieu, the most noteworthy difference is the boys’ unsuccessful attempt in implementing a system of checks and balances that could’ve prevented Jack from leading their society into devastation.