12/10/!7
Jocelyn Magdaleno
2nd&3rd Period
Growing Pains of Government
Through the course of United States history, the country has had to process through the establishment of how to function as a unified group. Post the Revolutionary War, men came together to refine what they saw as the best course of action in keeping their independence whole. Similarly, in the novel, Lord of the Flies by William Golding, a group of boys were left to survive after their plane crashed. Without the control of adults, the boys created their own establishment of rules and expectations. The growing pains that both the United States and boys in Lord of the Flies underwent shared many comparative features. This response will seek to evaluate the growing pains and how they shaped what we know to be true today. These two interesting stories that tragic parts of the story, have many similar things and different things with each other. Let us start off with the many things they have in common with each other, in my opinion, these two were made to have a place to speak. “The Lord of the Flies” had many group discussions about the leaders and rules that everyone must obey. The constitution has many cons of the situations they had back then, like, Limited Rights for Non-White Men to vote, No General Taxation, two out of three supporters needed to pass a law, and the representatives per state population was varied. Those were a few listed things that weren't the best decisions . As well of
William Golding represents the role of government and creating the constitution in his novel, “Lord of the Flies”. A story about a group of children stranded on an island struggling to survive. In order to do so, they create their own government to survive and hold everything together. Although this novel explains society, government and creating the constitution, it also has many differences.
The book Lord of the Flies has been a beacon for students who study the behavior of mankind. But in the first few chapters of the novel, readers will begin to notice different types of political changes within the group of lost boys. A democracy arises when all the boys vote for a leader, who ends up to be Ralph because he is the oldest. After he is voted, Ralph sees the slight resentment that Jack holds towards him because of his own choir group that he led. Attempting to withdraw from any confrontations, Ralph appoints Jack as his second in command. From this point, the story begins to slowly transition from a democracy into a dictatorship.
Throughout history, the way humans think has fascinated philosophers. One of the many recurring themes in human thinking is in regards to power: how we govern ourselves. Ideas of where this power should be placed vary from concepts such as Democracy to Republicanism to Socialism. However, the ‘where’ and ‘how’ of government has many opinions surrounding it, and these varying opinions often cause discontent and conflict. When humans are crossed with a conflict over the source of power in society, it is not out of the ordinary for a war or split to occur. The Lord of the Flies is not an exception to this rule of thumb. Written by William Golding, the book explores what occurs when a group of boys is left unsupervised to create
Have you ever been on a beach and seen a conch shell and wondered if someone in time used this for civilization? Or even to show leadership? Well if you haven’t, then for sure you will be amazed! In the novel Lord of the Flies, the author William Golding specifically focuses on how a group of children ends up on an unknown island without rules and order in which they become savages and nearly act similarly to animals in one way or another. One symbol in this novel is the conch shell. The conch shell in Lord of the Flies represents leadership and civilization, in which allows Ralph, the leader of the group, to call meetings to order and gives the chance for others to speak; however, it becomes worthless and loses its importance as the story progresses and is shattered at the end, showing how without respect and authority things can lead to savagery.
In Lord of the Flies, William Golding crafts a story of a group of ordinary British schoolboys that are stranded on an island in order to investigate how humans can return to their primal state if they are left without order to bind them. Left without the leadership and guidance of their parents, they attempt to mimic the ordered and civilized society that they had come from, but slowly, they succumb to their primitive desires and impulses, leading them descend into savagery. Throughout this elaborate work, Golding forges a political allegory that demonstrates how the defects in human nature contribute to the downfall of a democracy and allow people to be lured into a totalitarian regime or anarchy.
How does being stranded on a remote island sparsely populated with young boys who trying desperately to establish and maintain order reflect our society? In fact, William Golding holds important messages for the reader about how the purpose and peril of government remain relevant as metaphors of modern politics. Today, government substantially influences our lives in many aspects for the better or in some instances for the worse. In Lord of the Flies methods of control, propaganda, along with opposing militant governmental ideologies instill fear upon the boys which eventually lead to their downfall. Military dictatorship is a form of government wherein the political power resides with the military.
The Lord of the Flies conveys many of the strenuous hardships that the children faced working together to meet a common goal of getting rescued; yet they’ve had many disputes along their relentless journey because each of them has their own perspectives and priorities. One of the three of the essential complications the children had, was knowing how to be an exceptional, efficient leader or chief that was well respected. Also the other dispute they had faced, is accepting each others differences and coming to an agreeable compromise. One of the last dilemmas they faced, was trying to work together to create their own society and government, while they were trying to build their very own civilization. Although the children do have their own differences and deal with problematic troubles, they will begin to understand what the responsibilities of a leader will consist of.
When William Golding published his highly controversial novel Lord of the Flies, the horrors and tragedies he described were shocking for people to read. However, the of the worst crimes committed, as well as the acts of leadership, have more of a relation to the events happening around the readers than they may realize. In Golding’s novel, Lord of the Flies, the differences between boys and men, evil and innocence, and right and wrong are discussed as a group of boys are stranded on an island. There are no adults present, which essentially means there are no rules. Using their still civilized ways at the beginning of the book, they decide to elect a leader. This begins the struggle for power between two
“Which is better--to have laws and agree, or to hunt and kill?” (Golding 180). This quote, uttered by Piggy during a last ditch effort to heal severed ties among the boys of the island, is the epitome of the struggle that humans have had to face for perpetuity while attempting to find the ideal system in which to regulate a body of people. British novelist William Golding, author of Lord of the Flies, beautifully chronicles the differing governing structures of both democracy and anarchy. Throughout the duration of the story, the beneficial sides, as well as the pitfalls of each authoritative method, are revealed through the various consequences that result from the decisions made. While both the democratic and anarchic governing styles were employed by the misplaced island refugees, the democracy style of management was built around the basis of structure and order while the anarchy approach to regulation lacked any form of organization or discipline. As both forms of government were showcased amid the same congregation of boys, many contrasting ideas and beliefs between the two became immensely distinguishable. Some of the disparities of the systems that are exhibited through the course of the book include varying rationale used in decision making, the contrasting character the leaders of each movement possessed, as well as divergent symbols that represent each methodology.
Is it better for someone to die for what they believe in, or is it better for someone to live and give up their believes? In novels, films, and even in real life, there are martyrs, those who are killed for what they think, and there are those who alter their morals to fit the status quo. These two types of people can be further characterized into two groups: those who do not change are weak, and those who do change are strong. Charles Darwin established a theory that states how what makes a person strong or weak is how they decide to deal with change. The naturalist states that even though some are vastly intelligent, kind, or dignified, they end up dying first because lack of adaptability, or refusal to do so. In William Golding’s The Lord of the Flies, Simon is an example of the sort of weakness Darwin elaborates on in his theory. While he is the most wise out of the group and tries to help the boys as much as he can, Simon is the first main character to die because he is unable to keep up with the boys in both a physical and mental sense. Simon’s untimely death was caused by his refusal to abandon his civilized
“Crimes against humanity, as defined by the Rome Statue of the International Criminal Court, are particularly odious offenses in that they constitute a serious attack on human dignity or grave humiliation or degradation of one or more human beings… part of a widespread or systematic practice… tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority.” In the novel ‘Lord of the Flies,’ by William Golding, the idea of innate human savagery is explored through the hostile behaviour of English schoolboys who have been stranded on a desolate island. Bullied by their leader, Jack, the violence they unleash on each other constitutes crimes against humanity because Jack and his tribe were the de facto authority on the island, and conducted a systematic hunting down of other boys.
Alexander Hamilton once stated, “The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for among old parchments or musty records. They are written, as with a sunbeam, in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of the divinity itself; and can never be erased”. In 1954 William Golding Published the novel Lord of the Flies in order to get a deeper look into the flaws of society that are related to the flaws of human nature. During WWII a group of British school boy were being transported by plane but the plane was shot down killing the pilot and leaving a group of boys on an island where there is no adult supervision. Today our topic will be focusing on the pessimistic views of human nature that are presented
There are certain traits in individuals that seem to be passed down from generation to generation and, regardless of the number of studies and discoveries established, they have a way of showing up in our environments. In William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, a group of schoolboys find themselves stranded on an island and in a series of events, their behavior is altered and they become very malicious. It is questionable whether the reason for this alteration in their behavior is due to their circumstances or to their human nature. It is most probable that both of these options played a part in the boys’ immoral decisions but stronger evidence supports that their behavior was situational. Stanley Milgram dedicated himself to study behavior, bringing forth results that indicated that the majority of people will behave unethically when they are in a situation that calls for it. Relating this to Lord of the Flies, one is able to see the influence that Jack had over the other boys towards the end of the novel and this is an interesting concept to explore.
Someone’s dead, bloods been shed, and people are being hunted one by one. In most horror stories, the next step would be finding out who the murder is, and how to either stop it or get away from it. But in this story, the murderers are already given and how they killed the others are revealed. So what’s the use of these scenes of violence? In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, several boys ranging six to thirteen are stranded on an island after the plane they were aboard on crashed. They all survived except the pilot, so they’re all alone with no adults to supervise them. How lucky! Or is it? As they band together to kept order and survive on the island, things get out of hand and blood is shed. The boy’s
Countries around the world strive to have order within their nation. This can never happen as some humans ruin this order. Killing, destruction, and war; all of these ruin the order that is trying to be established. William Golding, a famous writer in the 1980’s, created “The Lord of the Flies” to explain to the reader the idea of order within the human race. If you continue reading, Golding also shows how that order lasts only for a small time until a person turns that order to chaos. Chaos isn 't always expected to happen and/or is not intended; but it always finds its way through one way or another. The novel explains order to chaos magnificently through the book’s characters, symbols, and events. The paragraphs below will demonstrate how these were portrayed.