Lowering The Voting Age Analysis

In my position I agree to lower the age of voting to 16-17 years old because it can raise up the percentage of voting. Many people are not voting because they don't believe it can help them and their community also with the support from 16-17 years old, it can show a huge difference on how the votes are increasing little by little. Also it can gives them experience on what's the voting like. Once they get older, they will know what to do because they registered the vote in an

With voter turnout being at such low point, especially amoung those of youger voting age, I think it would be wise to consider lowering the voting age to 16. Lowering the age required to vote to 16 would increase the average age-range of voters as a whole, and create a more diverse voting public. It may also spark civic interest in the youth of America

The controversy over lowering the voting age is a difficult one. While lowering the voting age will increase the number of voters, it is not guaranteed to increase the percentage of participation. We must also consider the fact that younger voters tend not to vote. Another concern is the involvement of young adults ages 16-18 in politics. It is not common that these teens follow politics and think about who would be a good leader for their country. Lowering the voting age most likely will not help to improve voter turnout or participation or turnout. We need to work toward increasing the participation of the existing voters.

The age to vote should remain 18 simply because this is the age when maturity and the comprhension skills needed are developed. Voters at the age of 16 would not participate in the way those in support of the age reduction believe. This age is far too young and would only prove to worsen our country as a whole. In order to correctly vote one must analyze each party's ideals and appeals and decide if they are beneficial.

Recently, there was an article about decreasing the voting age by 2 years. Lowering the voting age to 16 would be a mistake for maturaty reasons.

Although a lot people have called for lowering the voting age from 18 to 16, I do not agree with this idea.

The voting age was lowered from 21 to 18 in 1969 during the Vietnam war, because it was only fair to those aged 18 - 20 dying for their country have a say in how the country is run. Therefore if 16 year olds are now capable of

In the article “ Why We Should Lower the Voting Age to 16,” Laurence Steinberg asserts that teenagers deserve “ more than just a voice to make a change” but a right to vote (Steinberg). He elaborates on how teenagers are qualified to vote because their minds are fully developed enough to make good choices. Steinberg believes that teenagers have the responsibility to vote because currently the teens right now are having a “ thoughtful, eloquent protest.”

Some people have called for lowering the voting age from 18 to 16, claming it would improve voter turnout. This could be a real problem in US. Discussions about lowering the voting age distract from the real problem.

Indeed, many reasons exist as to why individuals in the age bracket of sixteen to eighteen should be given voting access. In their teenage years, young people are afforded the right to participate in the workforce and earn income. With this right, they should also be granted the privilege to vote in local, state, and national elections because they are paying towards local, state, and federal taxes. Simply, sixteen to seventeen year-olds pay into the government coffers, and thus should only be taxed if they have an equal voice in their government. In contrast, some may say young people have not paid their dues yet and have only paid limited tax dollars to the government. However, any person taxed should have a voice in government. Furthermore, if the voting age is lowered to sixteen years, young citizens are able to express their ideas and opinions related to both society and government as well as shed a different viewpoint on social matters. Teens in the U.S. can select political leaders, who value teen views and offer support to the young generation. The future of this country is truly the next generation, and issues and

Lowering the age for voters would have a negative impact in many different catigories. Being immturity, lack of knowledge, and simply caring. The wants of teens are far different than the needs of an adult.

Some people would say that keeping the voting age at 18 may be for the best. My generation doesn't involve themselves into politics and don't participate much in voting. Some people believe that 16 isn't mature or intelligent enough to understand the world around them yet. They think that when it comes to being responsible or having the power to influence who our future leaders will be gives a "child" too

At first one may think that 16 and 17 year olds are just focused on dating, having fun, and playing sports. Most would assume that they certainly aren’t mature enough or know enough about politics to vote. However, it is just the opposite, 16 and 17 year olds are in fact very qualified to vote and they care about politics. The voting age should be lowered to allow 16 and 17 year olds to vote. 16 and 17 year olds are just as capable as adults in voting, letting them vote would positively affect the voting field in numerous ways, and they are faced many responsibilities similar to adults’.

While lowering the voting age to 16 years old may sound like a good idea, It may be desasterous at the same time. The human brain isn't truly developed until after the age of 25. Having younger voters may not make a very huge difference, but at the same time it could.

People all over the United States are getting ready to make a decision on who to vote for in the Presidential election this fall. Most people don’t even begin thinking about the voting process until they reach the age of 18, since the legal voting age as of now is 18. However, some believe that the voting age should be lowered to 16, to allow for a more broad selection of voters. While opening up the option to vote for 16 year olds would provide a much larger number of voters, others think that teenagers would not take the election seriously and counting their votes as part of the overall election would be useless and unnecessary. There are many reasons aiding both sides of the argument.