preview

Memory Match In Nineteen Eighty-Four 1984

Good Essays

Memory Match

The first player chooses a card and carefully turns it over. Be sure not to bother the surrounding cards. The player then selects another card and turns it over. If the two cards are a matching pair then the individual takes the two cards and starts a stack. If the player makes a match he/she goes anew. The next player chooses a card. If it is a match for one of the cards that was previously flipped over, then the player tries to remember where the matching card is and turns it over. If the individual is successful at making a match, the player will place it in their stack and choose another card. The game continues in this fashion until all the cards are gone. The objective of this game is to remember where the cards that were …show more content…

Winston Smith is a first-hand witness to this changeable truth. Winston is a position in the Ministry of Truth. This specific ministry creates or forges the past into something unrecognizable to any person with an accurate memory: “so that each forgery “becomes” historic fact. One moment, Oceania is and always has been at war with one enemy, the next moment it is and has always been at war with another, and the people of Oceania accept the information as true” (“Critical”). In other words, The Ministry of Truth is the ministry of propaganda, it is responsible for any falsification of historical events. According to Orwell critic, Jocelyn Harris, “Winston knows that all history is a palimpsest, to be scraped clean and re-inscribed” (Harris). This critic is saying that the Party controls the people by erasing memories and even Winston is aware of this. Evidence from the novel that supports Harris’ argument is when O'Brien says, “You must stop imagining that posterity will vindicate you, Winston. Posterity will never hear of you ... You will be annihilated in the past as well as in the future. You will never have existed” (Orwell 160). This specific quotation from the novel announces the fact that even through Winston is aware that history is being changed, there is nothing he can do about it. This connects back to Harris’ quotation because she infers that Winston is aware that the Party abolishes …show more content…

In the book, the Giver and Jonas have a conversation about sharing the memories amongst everyone. Jonas suggests that if they share the memories with everyone, than he would not have to bear so much by himself (Lowry 142). The way that this society controls memories is by only introducing one person to them. If these memories were not held by one person then everyone will have to be burdened by the pain and torture: “They don't want that. And that's the real reason The Receiver is so vital to them, and so honoured” (Lowry 142). This quotation provides an insight on the reasoning behind the restriction of memories and the role The Receiver plays. In Carter F. Hanson’s piece,“The Utopian function of memory in Lois Lowry's The Giver,” he provides a series of useful arguments relating to the topic of shaping emotions. He analyzes why Lowry uses the concept of “The Receiver” of memories to control the communities feelings: “where one individual is responsible for holding all memories of the past so that others can live unburdened by the pain, knowledge and guilt of human history” (Hanson). This quotation from Hansons article clearly states that memories were abolished in this community for the purpose to void any lugubrious emotions and the way the community does this is by having a Giver. Overall, Lowry uses a different method of

Get Access