Metformin Pros And Cons

This act would declare contraceptives obscene and prevent them from being mailed or transported across state lines (PBS). This would make it nearly impossible for a woman to have access to birth control. She would have no choice but to turn to, as Sanger says in her book The Case for Birth Control, “the filthiest midwives and the quack abortionists” (6). If a woman did not want her baby, her only choice would be to have an abortion with a doctor who may have no degree or even experience in medicine. They would risk their lives for a child that they never wanted in the first

Rather than working towards creating a system that benefits all it buts millions more at risk. This bill includes large cuts to Medicaid, a program that help many low-income households afford healthcare. This cut would cause millions of our citizens to lose healthcare coverage. Likewise, this bill if passed would defend Planned Parenthood. Many of you in this room may not believe in abortion; however, Planned Parenthood provides thousands of women with care, from access to birth control, to STD testing, Planned Parenthood increases the sexual safety of women across the country. Likewise, the notion of a healthcare provider refusing to take you due to having a preexisting condition highlights a second evil, within privatized healthcare. Asking for those with serious medical issues to pay out of pocket for their medical expenses, when most average citizens cannot afford to, is an evil our country knows of but refuses to act upon. Under Trumpcare, millions upon millions of Americans would lose their healthcare cover, an act that is a step backwards in the development of our

On March 23, 2010, President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act into law. It was intended to provide the American people with better health coverage and care. Unfortunately, many people are still not covered due to a lack of information and because they simply cannot afford insurance even at a discounted price. Many feel that there is still a good deal of confusion regarding the ACA which can prevent people, especially women, from getting the coverage and care that they need. Women who are not used to getting medical care, may not know that programs now exist that make health care services free or very inexpensive. The women who are the least informed are the ones who need it the most as they experience high rates of unplanned births and chronic illnesses. It will be financially beneficial for local and state governments to find ways to get this information to women so as to prevent health problems that will cost the government millions of dollars in the long run.

Since the 1980’s, debate about how society should deal with the problem of criminalizing pregnant women who abuse drugs or alcohol has become a nationwide issue. Many states argue that the primary concern is making sure women have healthy pregnancies and healthy children. However, policies that threaten women with criminal prosecution and the potential loss of parental rights drive women away from pregnancy-related care. Constitutionally, enacting states to create these laws is unsound and places women in situations of risk. Less than a week ago a bill was sent to the governor of Tennessee after being approved by both the house and the senate, that would allow for women to be prosecuted if she takes an illegal drugs while pregnant. Although this bill is made to seem like it is promoting healthy pregnancies, many groups are urging the governor to veto it.

“Every 25 minutes, 1 baby is born suffering from opiate withdrawal. Newborns with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) are more likely than other babies to also have low birth weight and respiratory complications” (Dramatic Increases in Maternal Opioid Use and Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome, 2015, Paragraph 2). To insure a better life for these babies, people are trying to create an Act called the Plan of Safe Care Improvement or otherwise known as the Infant Plan of Safe Care Improvement. This Act is meant to protect future babies from not only being born drug dependent because of their mothers, but also ensuring them a drug-free environment after birth. It will also “get help for the mothers and any other guardians involved in drug addiction”

Many Americans are currently uninsured. The economy has struggled tremendously over the past 9 years due to medical bills causing Americans bad credit, bankruptcy, foreclosures on homes, vehicle repossession, and the list could continue forever; the Americans have had to choose either suffer from an illness or struggle from paying medical bills to avoid credit issues. The United States needs a change that supports the American people and family living this Act is

While legislators believe that this policy will effectively sort out the “worst of the worst” (Gonzales & DuBois, 2014), this reporter doubts the efficiency and utility of the policy. If the aim is to force mothers into treatment, then perhaps sending them to jail is not the most effective method. Those defending the law have sent mixed messages around how it should be carried out, some describing the law as a “velvet hammer” while others employ it as a strong-arm tactic used to bust women who use narcotics (Beyerstein, 2014; Goldensohn & Levy, 2014). This, in addition to the previous legislation protecting mothers, makes it uncertain how a woman will be received when she reveals her substance use. Likewise, the chances of getting arrested

The Congressional Budget Office estimates that about 8 million such persons would remain uninsured. Additionally, the bill restricts access to abortion services in the Health Benefits Exchanges and, in particular, for people receiving federal subsidies.

Presidential nominee Hilary Clinton has been a huge opponent when it comes to enforcing this bill (bing2017). Her, and many other women in America, feel like this is an injustice to women and their reproductive rights (thinkprogress2017). Research has shown that one in six women in American are on Medicaid (Refinery29). Before the Hyde amendment was approved, Medicaid was paying for about 300,000 abortions per year (refinery29&washingtontimes2017). Without the government funding abortions, many women may give up bills such as electricity or borrow money in order to terminate their pregnancy (thinkprogress). Others argue that when women are left with no way to pay for abortions that they are left to seek the operations from illegal or unlicensed professionals

vaccines will reduce grey squirrel numbers without causing the same stress as capture traps. This therefore is a more humane method of reducing grey squirrel numbers. It will work by having the vaccine inserted into the grey squirrels food. This would be a long term control measure as it would impact the ability to reproduce, decreasing the number of grey squirrels as the years go on.The vaccine would sterilise both male and female species as it will cause an antibody affect causing the immune system to target the sperm. this will lead to considrable falls in the number of grey squirrels being produced. with figures suggesting that it would only require 80% of squirrels to be vaccinated in order for the population to fall dramatically.

Waiting eagerly for a decision from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), pro-choice and pro-life activists rallied to voice their opinions on the drug mifepristone, also known as RU-486. However, the battle has just begun because RU-486, otherwise known as the abortion pill, was just approved for use in the United States on September 28, 2000. This controversial drug, first used in France, has been sparking debates in the U.S. ever since it was discovered in 1980. Now that it has been approved, many argue that this drug will make abortion more prevalent; however, others believe the approval of RU-486 is a positive decision and can greatly benefit women in the future.

Most women are unaware of the risks associated with taking prescription medications while pregnant. Usually the fear

In the documentary, when the 1950’s were discussed, drug addiction was depicted as an illness and to be treated by a doctor. The person that suffered the addiction was not blamed or seen as a criminal. Addiction was looked at as a public health issue but, today it is a crime issue because of the impact that “The War on Drugs” has had on America’s population. It has been shoved down our throats over the years since The War on Drugs campaign began that drugs, dealers and addicts are the enemy, America’s enemy.

Prenatal care is widely accepted as an important element in improving pregnancy outcome. (Gorrie, McKinney, Murray, 1998). Prenatal care is defined as care of a pregnant woman during the time in the maternity cycle that begins with conception and ends with the onset of labor. A medical, surgical, gynecologic, obstretic, social and family history is taken (Mosby's Medical, Nursing, and Allied Health Dictionary, 1998). It is important for a pregnant woman as well as our society to know that everything that you do has an effect on your baby. Because so many women opt not to receive the benefits of prenatal care, our society sees the ramification, which include a variety of complications primarily

the years 1973 until 2009, over 135 inmates were released from death row as new evidence surfaced and proved their innocence (Schmalleger 360). This is just one of the many alarming facts that assist in the argument that the death penalty should be completely abolished. As the public opinion of capital punishment changes, there has been a drastic shift in the way states are carrying out death penalty sentences. Since 2007, seven states have abolished the death penalty as a possible punishment for crime (Schmalleger 369). Even though many states still have the ability to sentence an offender to death, only ten states have practiced an execution since 2007 (Dieter 815). While many argue the death penalty is necessary to protect society and can serve as retribution to the victim 's family, capital punishment should be abolished because it violates religious beliefs, and is a cruel and costly alternative to life without the possibility of parole, and it gives the criminal a way out by not allowing the criminal to take responsibility for crimes they committed.