Moral Psychology Paper

In an earlier paper Haidt and Graham(2007) found that for extreme liberals, Harm / Care and Fairness / Reciprocity where almost always relivent, however those who are extremely conservative find that they value all five more equally when making moral choice. This correlates almost perfectly with the earlier paper from Graham, Haidt and Nosek(2009), showing that the findings seem highly reliable. Haidt and Graham(2007) go on to say that the recognition of the final three moral foundations(Ingroup / Loyalty, Authority / Respect and Purity / Sanctity) is key to allowing more fair and even discussions between the two political standpoints.

This investigation attempts to avoid making the same pitfalls that have been described by following an alternative procedure of applying SF and NP morality models. As discussed in chapter three (sections 3.1, 3.1.1, 3.1.2), SF and NP models indicate Lakoff’s prediction about conservatives and progressives way of thinking. Lakoff predicts that if political actors of both parties adopt either SF or NP moral standpoint, accordingly this will affect the politicians’ framing of ideas, issues and will shape the policy they adopt. For Lakoff (1996) the SF and the NP models represent internalized cognitive way of thinking and ultimately acting. They are cognitive models that indicate separate ideological

MFT is a theory that analyses the importance of serval different moral foundations. Haidt and Graham (2007) established that there are five main foundations on morality: (1) Harm / care, (2) Fairness / reciprocity, (3) Ingroup / loyalty, (4) Authority / respect, and (5) Purity / sanctity. The first (harm / care) foundation refers to an individual’s sensitivity to suffering and their potential to experience compassion, empathy, and care for others. The second (fairness / reciprocity) foundation describes ones’ notion of individual rights, justice, and equality. The third (ingroup / loyalty) foundation refers to how significant individual’s sense of belonging to a group/groups are, and how they prioritise the importance of loyalty to the group/groups. The fourth (authority / respect) foundation involves how an individual values authority/hierarchical social orders and the respect they give to those in power. The fifth (purity / sanctity) foundation focuses on an individual’s sensitivity to disgust and what they believe to be pure and impure (Graham, Haidt & Nosek,

Step 1: About 7% of the rich world's jobs are held by people from developing countries and an aging population who cannot fill the vacant positions currently available. Lant Pritchett proposal is to have 16 million of the poor became part of a guest worker program. In the United States for example; 3 million guest workers would stay 3 to 5 years, without citizenship. They could not bring their families, but they would have some protection through the certification process for these guest workers.

The moral foundation theory (MFT) is a theory of social psychology that explains the genesis of the reasoning morally and its variation by human beings based on modular and innate foundation. Jonathan Haidt and Joseph Craig advocated the theory by building Richard Shweder’s cultural anthropology work. The popularity of the theory is seen in the development of the theory in the book the "righteous mind" a book by Haidt. Currently, the theory has six foundations, which include sanctity, authority, loyalty, liberty, fairness, and care (Kugler, 2014, p. 414). The proponents of the foundations suggest a possibility of adding more foundations to the existing ones.

In this week’s discussion we are asked to analyze, form an opinion, and explain the actions we would take on two different ethical dilemmas.

When defining what Ethical Theory is my first thought is morals. Morals principles affects the way people make decisions and the why people live their own lives. Ethics come from a Greek work ethos, and this means character, habits, customs and dispositions. The morals that Ethical theory will display in a person life, is living a good life for them and their families, knowing what is right in life and taking care of their responsibilities. Researchers, divides ethical theories into three basic groups, first group is meta- ethics, the second group is applied ethics and the last groups is normative ethics. Meta-ethics deals with origins and ethical principles. Applied ethics is related to controversial topic like politics or war. Normative ethics concerned with moral judgements of what is right or wrong. Reflecting back to meta-ethics is having morals judgments, morals allow people need morals and value to as a person. When a person realize what is important in determine moral judgment, and the ethical

A brief overview of the history of moral psychology in the Kohlbergian tradition is necessary to understand the significance and need for the current proposal. Jean Piaget presented his construct of moral reasoning in his theory of development, and he found there were two stages of moral reasoning—heterenomous and autonomous. The former is associated with Piaget’s concrete operational stage as moral reasoning is dependent upon the relational context of the child and authority figures (parents, God, etc.) and is inductive by nature. The latter is

The dilemma for this situation is whether the father stealing a loaf of bread in-order to feed his hungry family is justified. It is difficult to accurately judge this situation due to many variables being unknown. For example; has the father been attempting to find employment? What originally occurred that caused this family to become hungry? Have other resources been utilized and exhausted? Regardless stealing is wrong and does have implications, however, the “whys” or reasoning behind the stealing can determine an appropriate punishment. When a crime occurs, it is not just the individual that suffers the implications. The family of the person in question will also be implicated whether that means losing a family member for a given period

Moral politics, theory, for example, says that Conservatives and Liberal attitudes are equally concerned in moral concerns (Lakoff, 2002). In more current research Frimer et al. (2013) implies that Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) may have exaggerated differences between Liberals and Conservatives and that their similarities outweigh their differences. Further research, by (Kivikangas, Lonnqvist, & Ravaja, 2016) also collaborates this, by showing correlations between political orientation and moral foundations were maybe overestimated in the study by Graham’s et al. (2009) research when compared with other

The benefits of acting morally are necessary to live a fulfilling and happy life. When one makes the distinction between right and wrong and chooses to act morally and do what they believe is right, they are reward and ultimately feel good inside.  There is great value in choosing to act morally and it is necessary to each person's pursuit of true happiness and peace.

First, Guilt makes us better people. "Guilt adds to our moral fiber, motivating us to be more socially sensitive and caring citizens than we would be otherwise... For instance, researchers have found that adults prone to feeling guilty were less likely to drunk drive, steal, use illegal drugs, or assault another person. If character is reflected in what you do when nobody's looking, then this moral emotion called guilt is one of its building blocks."

Ethical and moral dilemmas are an ineluctably ineluctable issue health care provider’s will face, this often leaves the provider torn in making the right decision. When providers are faced with an ethical or moral issue, the right answer is not always clear; and the process of resolving an issues requires the practitioner to examine the situation and make a decision predicated on what will be the best outcome. The purport of this paper to examine an ethical issue, describe the circumventing issues, and compare with Ohio state laws and regulations. Supplementally, the process of addressing the ethical issue with be outlined.

The medical professional is a field that requires doctors, physicians, dentists, nurses and all health care professionals to follow the workplace ethics and abide by its rule. But there are certain cases when they encounter treatment challenges leading them to ethical dilemma. Being a dentist by profession, even I came across a case that drifted me to ethical dilemma. A patient came with the chief complaint of pain in the upper front tooth region. On having the x-ray, I came to know that the patient had deep rooted caries and needs an urgent root canal treatment. The other treatment option was to get the tooth extracted before the swelling occurs due to the infection. The patient was not much happy hearing this as he feared anaesthesia and

Throughout the case of mapping the Muslim communities, it seems that LAPD and advocated that they were standing on the side of morality and ethical persuasion. It is convincible that LAPD was dedicated to its goal of preventing public from threat of terrorism, which was also LAPD’s answer of what should be done as a good thing ethically. However, as the article Introduction to Ethics posted on the BBC website saying: “Ethics doesn't give right answers.” Answers, as well as behaviors, are usually given and posted prior to determine if they are right or wrong on ethical basis. Therefore, certain behaviors considered as “right” under the opinion of the certain group may sometimes cause the other groups of people to oppose. In the case of mapping