Moral Universalism

613 Words2 Pages
Moral Universalism Moral Universalism is also referred to as moral objectivism. This approach argues for the presence of universal principles. Specific habits are merely incorrect despite the conditions. One can generally describe universalism as something's right for me, it's right for you; if it's incorrect for you, it's incorrect for me (John, 2008). Universalism is based upon the concept of a "logical test" that can be put on any moral issue. The specific nature of this test differs extensively amongst various factions of universalists. For instance, utilitarianism states that the proper logical test is "Does my activity produce the utmost good for the greatest number of individuals?" If the response is in the affirmative, then a utilitarianist would state that the activity is morally right (John, 2008). Moral universalism through human rights has actually become commonly accepted in recent years. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, released by the United Nations in 1948, as well as the Geneva Conventions (which specify reasonable treatment of detainees of battle) are based upon the concept of moral universalism. In shorts, humans all have specific rights and to reject those rights is constantly immoral (Margaret and Andersen, 2006). Ethnocentric Approach. Ethnocentrism is evaluating an outside culture only by the values and needs of one's own culture. The ethnocentric person will evaluate various groups relative to his/her own certain group or culture,
Open Document