preview

Most Dangerous Game

Satisfactory Essays

Everyone does certain things when they can’t have what they desire and often they are mean. Whether they mean it or not it still happens. In “The Most Dangerous Game” Zaroff can’t be the best hunter in the world with Rainsford still alive, so since he could not get what he desired Zaroff hunts and attempts to kill Rainsford. In “All Summer In A Day.” Margot can remember the sun from while on Earth, however on Mars the sun comes out only once every 7 years causing the kids not to remember and to be jealous. Resulting in the kids locking Margot in a closet before the sun comes out because they can not get what they desire, which is to see the sun everyday. Both Richard Connell in “The Most Dangerous Game” and Ray Bradbury in “All Summer In A Day” we can see how the authors use actions and feelings to get across the point of people do mean things when they can not have what they desire.

Both of …show more content…

The severity of their actions and what they do to whom they envy indeed differ. In “All Summer In A Day” the children only lock up Margot in a closet and do not let her out till the sun is gone. While this is not charming, it is not as bad as in “The Most Dangerous Game.” In which Zaroff results to unrealistic actions and attempts to kill Rainsford to achieve his desire. Another difference in both of the stories is the whether they succeed at their actions. In “The Most Dangerous Game” Zaroff does not succeed at killing Rainsford while “All Summer In A Day” the children actually do succeed at causing Margot to not see the sun. As stated earlier in both “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell and “All Summer In A Day” by Ray Bradbury we see how when people can’t have what they desire they do mean things. After reading these texts we as readers we are able to see the effects of jealousness and envy. Both of these stories go to show that even though we can’t have what we desire we shouldn’t result to cruel

Get Access