The possibility of having multiple decisions occur at once is displayed in a short story written in 1941 called “The Garden of Forking Paths”. This concept makes the short story seem more like a giant puzzle that always has a missing piece. With the outer edges solved creating a frame narrative with the theme of time which the author wrote to confuse the reader. Said by Mr. Dewey, if you read this story and understand it then you didn’t read the story properly. Meaning you didn’t dive deep enough into the reading, just read around the edges, the frame, and didn’t come close to or reach the core of the short story. You can compare the format of the story to a magic trick where the author is the magician. The magic trick the reader is presented with is how can multiple decisions occur at once. …show more content…
When he believes his cover is blown when a fellow spy ends up dead he makes the rash decision to make one final attempt to inform his Chief. On a race with time Yu Tsun knows of only one way to make sure that the Chief in Berlin will receive the message. So he goes out and kills a man named Stephen Albert whose name now paints the newspaper. Thus making it possible for the Chief to decipher that the city Albert is where he must attack. Another feature in the story that got my attention was when the main character Yu Tsun compared his childhood as a “ damp path zigzagged like those of my childhood.” (1341) this sentence in the paragraph jumped out to me because it didn’t seem to fit in with what Albert and Yu Tsun were talking about. Furthermore, Yu Tsun’s childhood is never mentioned in the story, only in this one line. Another part in the story I found intriguing was when Yu Tsun and Albert were discussing the Ts’ui Pen labyrinth and how the labyrinth was the entire world plus time
A narrative is an order in which something is put. there is often a reason behind this order. Directors frequently use flashbacks to show previous stories or a passing of time to the audience (Bordwell and Thompson 79). Character and time help the audience to make sense of a narrative and allows them to speculate about what is about to come. Some different narrative theories suggest ways in which stories are commonly put together. A linear narrative has the simple beginning, middle and end story line and the story will flow chronologically from beginning to end (Bordwell and Thompson 85). A non-linear narrative is a narrative that does not follow a regular beginning-middle-end pattern where the storytellers often change the order of events (Bordwell and Thompson 80). This
What makes stories special is the ability to portray meaning between the lines. Every author has their own characteristics and spin that they incorporate into each of their pieces. These can include character genre, symbolism, plot structure, and irony. Shirley Jackson writes an ironic story about a small village who partakes in an annual lottery. The village looks forward to this day and moods are always high. However when the reader gets to the end of the short story they are shocked to find the lottery is a drawing for who in the village gets stoned to death. In The Lottery, Jackson surprises her readers by putting an ironic twist at the end of her tale, by filling the story with warming articulation, light hearted characters, but
Even though all four of these stories are effective in the way they are told, they all could have a completely different effect if they were told in a different perspective. If one looks at “The Lottery” and “The Story of an Hour,” for instance, both could have been different in the first person. If you took “The Lottery” and placed it in the first person, one would know from the start whatever he or she was doing in the center of town and would get the feelings of whoever is telling the story. If the story were told this way it would have probably been less effective and as a reader you would not be as curious. If “The Story of an Hour” were told in the first person we would have a completely different view on Mrs. Mallard and her heart problem. Next the story would end sooner and we would have never found out the husband was
how they examine a certain theme and how their differences in style are significant (i.e. how they approach that theme and what is says about the story’s message and/or the author’s goals). In either case, you will need to include brief summaries of each individual story.
story. By showing three different perspectives the reader is able to have a better idea of
The result of these characteristics give each story suspense and mystery, leaving the readers wondering what each character will do next and what further action will take place. Characters hold a primary role in determining the outcome of a story, which is the reasoning behind the many similarities and differences among literary characters. Also, a clear example is the similar plots with two completely different outcomes. Once the audience understands a character, they are capable of building on their existing knowledge to foreshadow events or understand the text more logically, which is evident when reading these
ways as the each author’s intentions are to direct the reader to the main plot by describing the
This clever story is crafted down to the smallest detail - every word and expression implies something, often has a second meaning and so manipulates the reader's opinion. The factor that makes this story even more
How does the writer use language and structure to convey her opinions about The Danger of a Single Story?
All 3 stories provided evidence on how authors use different strategies to create the story or passage. In the story Stripes, the story is a problem and solution, I know this because in the story its shows in paragraph 3 that 3 hundred years ago no one worried about running out of tigers in the world, there were 8 species back then, now and their days there is only 3. Now in days a l-ot of the tigers are extinct or are on the way to be. This proves that they had a problem, and they gave a solution and it was solved. This lower the chance of less safety.
one of the following stories, analyzing a literary strategy or technique the author uses to make the story more effective. Tie the use of the strategy or technique to one of the literary elements mentioned in our book.
For instance, in situation F these correct thoughts are specified by the creator "you'll need to confront it, the endings are dependably the same anyway you cut it" and "the main credible consummation is the one given here: John and Mary kick the bucket. " The third individual target perspective that this story is composed in is the thing that makes the characters so level, the redundancy so void, and the story so basic. For instance, a considerably more engaging story in B is sincerely disconnected and level in light of how the writer intentionally needs energy by stating, "Mary experiences passionate feelings for John yet John doesn't begin to look all starry eyed at Mary.
Authors use stylistic techniques to convey meaning and to bring richness and clarity to their pieces of writing. In the short story “The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County,” a man named Smiley is cheated out of a bet after he was so confident that he was going to be victorious. In the short story “Cannibalism in the Cars,” a train full of political figures is stopped by a severe snowstorm, preventing them from continuing their journey. In “The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County” and “Cannibalism in the Cars,” Mark Twain uses imagery, characterization, and foreshadowing in order to aid a reader's understanding of the stories.
The style of the delivery of the plot is an important aspect of literature. The way in which an author uses narrative is what gives the story substance and life. The plot of any story is just a patterns of events that have a beginning, middle and end. However, the narrative is the medium through which the story is presented and can therefore affect a text and shape the meaning and structure of the plot. The most common form of narrative in literature is the use of a narrator, which is a character that relays the story through written rhetoric.
The principles of Narratology can be divided into two big categories. First, there is the distinction between the tale and the telling. The tale is the guideline of the text; it shows the sequence of events in the order they take place. As such, the tale is rarely objectively observable in a text since the events are not often found in a linear order. This brings the telling. The telling shows the tale as it is presented. This includes analepsis and prolepsis, memories, but also different points of view. A series of events might be repeated multiple times if it is seen through a