preview

Historiographical Discussion Of The Duel Between Burr And Hamilton

Good Essays

A Historiographical Discussion of the Duel Between Aaron Burr and
The duel between Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton holds a significant relevance in
American history and should be examined within the context of early American culture and politics. The recent historiography of the incident provides us with a complex, evolving web of conflicting interpretations. Since the day of this tragic duel, contemporaries and historians have puzzled over why these two prominent American statesmen confronted each other on the Plains of Weehawken. What circumstances or events could have motivated two of the most brilliant political minds in America to endanger their lives and reputations by taking aim at each other on that dismal day? …show more content…

J. Lee and Conalee Levine-Schneidman argued “it was not Burr who was the instrument, but rather Hamilton himself—or rather Hamilton’s distorted perception of Burr as his evil self” that promulgated the duel.3 This article entitled “Suicide or Murder? The Burr-Hamilton Duel,” published in a 1980 edition of the Journal of Psychohistory, represents the first example of
“psycho-history” to be discussed in this paper. The authors presented Aaron Burr as introverted and self-absorbed, a man forever compared to the saintliness of his namesake. His father was a reverend and President of the College of New Jersey and his mother was the daughter of
Jonathan Edwards. Therefore, the Schneidmans argued, Burr had quite the reputation to uphold,
1 Joseph J. Ellis, “The Duel,” in Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation, (New York, NY:
Vintage Books, 2000), 20.
2 Ibid., 11.
3 J. Lee and Conalee Levine-Schneidman, “Suicide or Murder? The Burr-Hamilton Duel.” Journal of
Psychohistory 8, no. 2 (1980), 160.

writing that “throughout

Get Access