preview

My Life Without Drugs, By Russel Brand

Decent Essays

Most people in the West are commonly users of alcohol, and most people use this substance, this drug, to spice up their lives. Some of the people who drinks occasionally are also users of other drugs such as cocaine or MDMA or something else. And even though the majority of the population is able to be in control of their intake, some people has let the alcohol and the drugs taken over their lives. Now these drugs aren't only being used to spice up their existence, and the cocaine is now maybe being dosed up to heroine, and now these substances will be used to fill some sort of gap one cannot escape from other ways. 
 In the article my life without drugs, written by Russel Brand, we get to know Brands view on drugs by first letting us …show more content…

The good things about these substances is that they can fill up your holes of thoughts and memories that keeps following and hunting you; the bad thing is that you are probably going to get addicted because of the escapism the drugs offers. Brand is good at speaking for his case because he has been there himself which gives him an authority others are not capable of. He can acquaint himself in other peoples place and he understands what the addicts and their families are going through, which stands in contrast to his adversary, Peter Hitchens, who only sees addiction as a self-inflicted condition the involved have brought them self into, and he sees it as a crime that needs to be punished. As Brand says: “Where I differ from Peter is in my belief that if you regard alcoholics and drug addicts not as bad people but as sick people then we can help them to get better” (p. 4, l.15.) He does not think it is a crime because you have a reason for doing these drugs and most people are doing it to get rid of something that haunts you, and if you handle this with prison, you will only get some drugs of the street but the addicts will still need their different fixes and commit other crimes to get them because they do not get the proper help and treatment to escape the ghosts inside …show more content…

Not everybody knows someone who is addicted, so when you mention a person who most people know, it is easy to relate, because she is in the medias and she can be followed on screen. If you on the other hand mentions someone only one specific knows, then it suddenly becomes very personal and for those who has an addict in their family or group of friends, it is also really easy to relate to. 
“I see the foil scorch. I hear the crackle from which crack gets it's name. I feel the plastic fog hit the back of my yawning throat.” (p. 4, l. 4) Here the senses are used so we, once again, can have an insight in what his life is like, but it also gives us a seat in the front row because we can feel what there is going on. Because he has had an addiction himself, and he is now helping others with addictions, he has an authority which makes ethos to a used form of appeal. Pathos is seen when he involves the reader ex. in the sentence with the senses. 
 The end with him buying his junk might confuse one a bit, because one can tend to think that he has started picking up drugs again, but it is just him finishing his story about “yesterday”, (“The last time I thought about taking heroin was yesterday.” p. 1 l. 1) where

Get Access