preview

NAPLAN Response Essay

Decent Essays

In regards to improvement, the NAPLAN results suggest that Nadia has improved 11.6% in her reading from Year 5. She has also improved in spelling, with a 17.2% increase, as well as a 19.4% increase in numeracy. These percentages all fall out of the margin of error, indicating an accurate and sound level of improvement. However, Nadia’s writing NAPLAN result indicated a 0% improvement from Year 5, as well as a 1.5% decrease in punctuation and grammar. While the decrease of 1.5% in grammar and punctuation is within the margin of error I would like to argue that we should not be seeing a decrease in results at this stage of Nadia’s schooling.
Grammar and punctuation was the only section of the NAPLAN paper where Nadia answered all questions. This data gathered gives a sound understanding of her abilities. I would like to argue that Nadia’s grammar and punctuation is effecting her …show more content…

The meta-analysis of these studies found that method yielded negative results (Anderson, 1997). This proposes that traditional methods of teaching grammar did not improve the abilities of the students. Sentence combining by contrast provides a more effective substitute to traditional grammar and punctuation instruction as it not only develops students’ written work but also improve their syntactic abilities. Furthermore, a recent study establish that instructing students to pay attention to the purpose and real-world application of grammar and punctuation in the framework of writing created stronger and more positive impacts on students’ written work (Fearn & Farnan, 2005). Largely, the studies on teaching grammar and punctuation suggest that, unconventional methods like sentence combining, have a far more significant impact than those of traditional means to develop the quality of students’ grammar and punctuation and subsequently their

Get Access