Napoleon's Conflict with Russia Essay

This caused battle the whole Russian army to fall apart (almost all soldiers were killed), as well as the Ruler to become more vulnerable and lose strength, this later caused the Russian revolution. The army never went back to the strength it used to have. General Alexander Samsonov who had commanded the Russian Second Army committed suicide. (“Battle of Tannenberg (1914)”)

Although his armies enjoyed unprecedented successes and expanded the French Empire from Spain to the steppes of Russia, the Napoleonic way of war was fraught with deficiencies. Due to the Napoleon's genius and mastery of this period of military manoeuvres, he was able to forestall the affects of the inherent limitations of his system until the war of the Sixth Coalition (1813) and eventually the fateful battle of Waterloo (1815). One the most significant, intrinsic flaws in Napoleon's system was related to issues of command. During the beginnings of Napoleon's career, he commanded armies of sizes up to 60 000 troops. In Italy in 1796, he commanded a force of just 38 000. With the increasing sizes of forces in the later empire, due to concepts such as levee en masse and recruitment legislation of 1792, the inability of a single commander to control such vast forces was becoming apparent. The sheer immensity of the forces now mustered was unprecedented. In 1812 the Grande Armee, consisted of a staggering 611 000 soldiers. Much to the hindrance of the later empire, few, if any officers in the Grande Armee, besides Napoleon himself, could command forces

Although Napoleon was able to formulate an army large enough to force the Russians to retreat, he did not prepare enough supplies to support all of his soldiers. Lack of food and clothing weaken his army, especially after the scorched earth policy, which was Alexander I’s intent that Napoleon underestimated. During the Battle of Borodino, Alexander I was not able to secure Moscow, the holy city, as he was forced to retreat, which enabled Napoleon to move forward into the city. By the time Napoleon reached the Moscow, the city had been destroyed and burned, having nothing to motivate him in Moscow, he was forced to retreat. Although Napoleon may have won the battle at Borodino, he did not gain anything from it as Czar Alexander I always seemed to always be one step in front of him, Napoleon was unable to outwit Alexander I and his military tactics. His soldiers were not equipped with the necessary items to survive the scorched earth and the harsh Russian winter, thus, the majority of Napoleon's soldiers perished, reducing his army of 420,000 soldiers to 10,000 soldiers when he left Moscow. The dramatic reduction of soldiers made his army vulnerable to later attacks from the Russians, who understood the terrain and was well fed and fully clothed. Due to the Russian tactics that Napoleon overlooked, he

     After battling with Britain, Spain, and Germany, Napoleon invaded Russia. The purpose of this invasion was to enforce the Continental System. In 1812, a Russian winter and the Russian strategy of Scorched Earth defeated Napoleon and his army of 500,000 men. This was Napoleon’s worst defeat. It

Tsarism in Russia Although the 1905 Revolution did not bring Tsarism to its demise, it had important consequences on Tsarism. It illuminates the problems of Russian society and exposed the government's weaknesses. Nevertheless, the Tsar managed to suppress his opponents and appeased the masses, saving his regimes from collapse. However, this security was only temporarily as the root of Russia's problems were not solved and WWI in 1914 was the last straw for the decaying regime.

Russian inability to recognize changing tactics and weapons of modern warfare is inexcusable but sadly explainable. Because the Czar tended to centralize power and surround himself with "yes men," he missed the good advice of those in his country who could have helped guide Russia into war. Some of these choices can also be blamed on misconceptions of Russian capabilities, and of its military identity. The military reforms that were not completely halted by inept leaders were otherwise thwarted by the lack of details with which an army mobilizes and fights. Details were not an important aspect for Russian pre-war strategy or estimations.

The Russian Revolution led to many improvements in production and education, allowing industrialization, but at the cost of many Russian lives. Russia advanced rapidly during the revolution. The question is were the Russian people better off after the Russian revolution? I believe so because of the improvements in education and production. Without the deaths of the Russian people they wouldn’t of been able to do this.

Alexander I: Alexander I, 1777–1825, czar of Russia (1801–25), son of Paul I (in whose murder he may have taken an indirect part). In the first years of his reign the liberalism of his Swiss tutor, Frédéric César de La Harpe, seemed to influence Alexander. He suppressed the secret police, lifted the ban on foreign travel and books, made attempts to improve the position of the serfs, and began to reform the backward educational system. In 1805, Alexander joined the coalition against Napoleon I, but after the Russian defeats at Austerlitz and Friedland he formed an alliance with Napoleon by the Treaty of Tilsit (1807) and joined Napoleon's Continental System. Alexander requested M. M. Speranski to draw up proposals for a constitution, but adopted only one aspect of Speranski's scheme, an advisory state council, and dismissed him in 1812 to placate the nobility. During this period Russia gained control of Georgia and parts of Transcaucasia as a result of prolonged

Napoleon Bonaparte was a French military leader and eventual political leader in France who was able to seize power during the end of the French Revolution of the late 1790's and early 1800's. Napoleon was the leader of France from 1804 to 1815 and mostly remembered as a leader in a cycle of European battles. He institutionalized the changes brought about by the French Revolution and sought to spread them throughout Europe. It has been long debated the factors that allowed Napoleon to seize power and eventually crown himself emperor. Such factors that have been considered have been Napoleon's personality, his military exploits, the failings of the Directory, support of the people and army and even sheer luck.

Amid this battle the French acknowledged how savvy he was Napoleon (Emerson, 2015). He added to a strategy that worked proficiently. The adversary armed force into two sections would be diminished, then toss his entire existence on one side before the other side could meet them (Emerson,

Little did he know, the winter was quickly approaching, and it was not something that could be dealt with easily. The winter was approaching, the troops were running out of food, and it was too late to turn back. Napoleon was quickly losing soldiers by the day. Many were killed of starvation, while others were killed by Russian horsemen called “Cossacks”, or they froze to death in the harsh temperatures (Palmer). Napoleon finally made his way back home to France, returning with only about 50,000 soldiers, losing nearly 90% of his Grand Armee (Chandler).

The artillery and small arms were years behind that of France. The Russian army was a conscription army, meaning that local farmers had to furnish a certain number of surfs for military service, as opposed to a professional, trained army where the government supplies the soldiers with all of their needs. An amazing half-million soldiers had enlisted in Napoleon’s Grand Armée (Saglamer, Beginning of the March). This was the largest army gathered for one single invasion. Russia’s army was out numbered 3:1 with only one hundred-seventy thousand soldiers. Not only was the Russian army not well trained, they were also ill equipped. Napoleon recognized that it would be difficult and extremely slow for Russia to mobilize her army due to her enormous size and weak infrastructure. If Napoleon invaded now, he knew that he could be well into the Russian territory before meeting any major opposition. On June 24, 1812, Napoleon began his fatal Russian campaign. The Grand Armée, led by Napoleon, crossed the Nieman River, into Russia. On the journey to Moscow, Napoleon met virtually no major opposition. The first stop in the campaign was Kovono. Early into the campaign, the Grand Armée was affected by a colic epidemic that claimed the life of nine thousand horses and thousands of soldiers (Web, Russian Embassy). This slowed the pace of the army. Harsh weather conditions caused the dry roads to turn to mud, making it extremely difficult to maneuver the

In the years of Napoleon’s reign, he engaged in numerous wars throughout Europe to dominate nations and force them under his control, resulting in the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives. Although, some may say most of the wars were not initiated by Napoleon himself, and he was only responding to a foreign threat. However, that statement is unfair because those countries only engaged in battle when they felt Napoleon’s spreading control threaten their nations. France was a powerful force and the weaker European countries allied together to stop Napoleon from overthrowing their governments and forcing his control on them.

Fearing the same deadly fate as General Mack and the Austrian Army, General Kutuzov retreated to the east, engaging in small skirmishes with the French until he was final forced to change plans and March through Hollabrunn to evade Napoleon’s forces. (Duffy, 1977) By this time, Napoleon had marched into Vienna, now occupying both upper and lower Austria. Kutuzov had failed to stop Napoleon from advancing into Vienna, but he was able to link up with his reinforcements, about 27,000 soldiers under the command of General Friedrich Wilhelm Count von Buxhowden. Kutuzov now had

Everyone knows that Napoleon was a great leader and commander but it is not as cut and dry as popular history makes it out to be. His great victory at Austerlitz cemented him as one of the greatest commanders in history. This battle is was a tactical masterpiece up there with Gaugamela and Cannae. However, there is more to analyze here than just the battle itself. Many aspects of war include mobilization, supply, training, moral, army structure etc. and all play a part in Napoleon’s victories and the creation of the French Empire. Another variable to consider is the quality of the armies led by Tsar Alexander I of Russia and the Holy Roman Emperor, Francis II of Austria. The focus here is to look at how these aspects played a role in