I would have completely supported the bill because it was needed after 9/11. We had to respond to a time that terrorism made itself real on our soil. I would make a major change of intelligence. Our police are required to do so much in the four steps of preparedness and yet they don’t get the full picture when it comes to a federal level. They should receive as much information that is absolutely necessary to make their jobs easier and safer. Obviously, there are some information that doesn't need to be given, but if it is a matter of national security and to them the local security they need to have all the facts to do their job
After the tragic events of 9/11, the government desperately needed to find a way to contradict terrorism. They approached this conflict by passing the Patriot Act in October 26, 2001, signed by President George W. Bush. This act widened the government’s authority to invade their citizens’ privacy, while reducing checks and balances like judicial oversight, public accountability, and the ability to challenge government searches in court. Even though the Patriot Act was purposely ratified to benefit our country from dangerous terrorists, some people quarreled and disapproved of it. In my perspective, I would have also disagreed on the Patriot Act.
September 11, 2001, the United States was attacked by terrorist. It involved four planes that were hijacked. Three planes hit buildings such as, World Trade Center 1, World Trade Center 2, and the Pentagon. Another plane eventually crashed in a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. September 11, many Americans fear for their lives, 17 years later, do we actually know what really happened? What secrets are the government is keeping from us American citizens? There's questions that still have not been answered.
9/11 shifted the primary role of the US government to keeping US citizens safe, but it is not at the expense of individual freedoms. After the 9/11 attacks took almost 3,000 lives and shocked not only the US but other countries, the US decided to make changes to certain things, in order to prevent more attacks. The government did this by detaining illegal aliens, teaming up with other countries, creating a new department of Homeland Security, and bumping up security. These actions did not take away individual freedoms, they are rather saving lives and keeping the US safe from unwanted threats.
After the 9/11 attacks, the U.S passed a variation of the elastic clause called the Patriot Act, which allows the U.S to do whatever is necessary for the protection of the U.S from terrorists. Some of these actions include seizing the homes of Muslims citizens and spying on suspicious U.S citizens who may be connected to terrorist groups. Even though controversy has arisen about whether or not this is constitutional, the United States used the elastic clause to defend the patriot act. By doing this the federal government claims that they are allowed to go beyond the law in times of crisis in order to do things that are necessary for national security. Although the federal government argues that they have the right to violate multiple amendments through the Elastic Clause and Patriot Act, using the privilege to obstruct and abuse the assumed powers of the constitution has an extremely negative effect on the structure of democracy in the nation, proving that using these clauses to seize the homes of “suspicious” Muslim citizens only affects the nation negatively in the long term.
Hook: In a mere two hours, America was changed forevermore by an unspeakable act of terror.
Since the September 11 attacks terrorism attacks the world has been in a constant war with terrorism. Right after these attacks, the Congress rushed to pass rules to strengthen security in the United States while also limiting our freedoms as a US citizen. On October 23, 2001, the Patriot Act was proposed. This act allows law enforcement officials to obtain a search warrant anywhere a terrorist-related activity occurred, it Prohibits the harboring of terrorists, and it punishes terrorist acts in the United States and around the world. On October 25, 2001, the Act was passed by the Senate by 98 to 1. The one vote that was in opposition to the act was Senator Russell Feingold. He and other opponents of the law have criticized its detentions of immigrants, and how the law allows enforcement officers to search a home or business without the owner's consent or knowledge. Although he was outnumbered 98 to 1 he still made an extensive impact on the outcome of the Patriot
Then They Were Gone. The twin towers turn into a pile of ash and rubble after two planes disintegrate in the center of both towers. People were running every were to get to out of the ash and smoke fire fighters running in while everyone is running out many not making it back out. From this day on nothing has been the same the people were devastated that it happened and cried out for better security in our nation. Since September 11, 2001 United States security procedures have drastically changed.
Just like every Tuesday, Jane got up and ready for work. She got up at her usual time, about six AM, had a cup of coffee before she got her kids up and ready for school. As she’s helping her three year old daughter brush her teeth, Jane’s husband came in and said his final goodbyes to his wife. Sadly, neither Jane nor her husband knew that though. After about 7:45 AM Jane had her kids dropped off at school or preschool and was now on her way to work at The World Trade Center. September 11th use to be just a normal day in September until terrible events happened; these events changed America’s homeland security, started a war, and a memorial in New York.
Great post! The creation of Homeland Security itself is very interesting because we were all around for 9/11. We could tell you exactly what we were doing and where we were for this tragic event on our soil. The memory and depending on the person, the feelings will have a strong presence for the rest of our lives. When George W. Bush proposed The Department of Homeland Security in 2002, he was protecting and defending the American people. All of the different levels of government began to work together like never before. The nature of threats on America are ever changing and we required a structure to protect against invisible enemies that could strike at any time, with any weapon.
Homeland Security has not affected me negatively. However, I do feel positive about some changes that were made after the 9/11 attack, the Homeland Security Act was pushed through Congress to organize a government that is responsible for dealing with terrorist threats on the U.S. The aftermath of 9/11 brought awareness to our country. Personnel are more aware of when a threat exists and taking the needed steps to do something about the threat before it happens. Better changes made within the country after the 9/11 attack some examples are: 1. Travel (Aviation and Transportation Security Act). The new TSA implemented procedures that included stricter guidelines on passenger and luggage screening. 2. Government (Patriot Act and Transportation
Security, however you may think of it the measures we take for it can never enough. It's like insurance you have it not because you want something to happen but because you know that things do happen. That is the United States Border Patrol and Customs they are our first line of defense to the war on drugs and the war on terrorism, for that they have the illegal immigration policy and the pros and cons (www.kyma.com/news/securing-america/646148044.).
The September 11 attacks were a series of four coordinated terrorist attacks by the Islamic terrorist group al-Qaeda on the United States on the morning of September 11, 2001. The group al-Qaeda hijacked four airplanes and carried out suicide attacks against targets in the U.S. Two of the planes were flown into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York City. The third plane hit the Pentagon outside Washington, D.C, and the fourth plane crashed in a field in Pennsylvania. Almost 3,000 people were killed during the 9/11 terrorist attack.
The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2011 prompted the world to reevaluate and drastically modify airport and airline security. “Four targets had been chosen, all iconic American buildings that would send a clear message of the depth of their hatred for the United States. All four planes crashed, killing all on board—terrorists, crew members, and passengers, along with hundreds who were killed inside the structures, on the ground, and the men and women who ran into collapsing buildings in an effort to try and save others” (Smutz 1). As Jason Villemez said “the decade after the 9/11 attacks reshaped many facets of life in America” (Villemez 1). Before the attacks, people did not think that large scale hostility towards innocent people in
The September 11 attacks were a various attacks of coordinated terror by theIslamist group referred to as Al-Qaeda. The attack happened on Tuesday September 11, 2001, whereby an average of 3,000 people died, and at least $10 billion in property damage occurred. The first conclusion to be drawn by most low enforcement agencies was that it was carried out by the Alqaeda, with the US government responding with what was known as the war on terror. While Osama Bin Laden initially denied any involvement in the attacks, he, later on, claimed responsibility for the attacks in 2004.
“The Homeland Security Act of 2002 established the federal United States Department of Homeland Security. Its stated mission is to secure the nation against terrorist attacks, to protect against and respond to threats and to ensure safe and secure borders” (Andrew, C., & Walter, F., 2013). “In addition to reducing the nation’s vulnerability to terrorism, the act was also created minimize the damage and facilitate recovery from any attacks that may occur” (Homeland Security, Department of, 2017). Many people want protection from dangerous situations, but what’s the cost of protection.