Nietzsche And Mill 's Theory Of Morality Essay

Better Essays

Nietzsche and Mill have explored the theory of ‘morality’ from different perspectives. The two philosophers appear to get along that the notion ‘morality’ has been exploited to a great extent, though a little certainty has been provided on the issue. The two philosophers agree on the complexity of the issue. Mill’s theory of ethics is based on the concept of ‘utility. ' The philosopher provides the meaning of the idea as it has been largely perverted. Nietzsche stipulates that ‘morality’ is not a common notion due to the existence of ‘the masters’ and ‘slaves. ' Thus, ‘morality’ can be regarded from the perspective of the ‘masters, ' and ‘slaves, respectively. ' Both ethical theories have the right to be like each of them contributes to understanding the origins of ‘morality. ' However, in his theory, Nietzsche is trying to explore the human nature beyond good and evil, while Mill simplifies the human nature. Thus, Nietzsche would criticize Mill’s theory.
To begin with, Nietzsche’s contribution to the study of ‘morality’ has three core aspects: a criticism of moral genealogists, modern evolutionary theory, and a critique of moral values (Ansell-Pearson, xv). For Nietzsche, reading morality is complex due to the numbers of errors people have incorporated into their fundamental ways of thinking, feeling and living (Ansell-Pearson, xvi). Furthermore, these errors are the example of an individual’s complete ignorance of oneself and the world. For years, people have been

Get Access