preview

Nuclear Arms Race Research Paper

Better Essays

Kennedy Johnson
AP Euro
Mr. Chin
May 26, 2016

The Nuclear Arms Race

After the end of World War II, the world was left with the two global Superpowers, the U.S and the the Soviet Union. Having completely contradicting government ideologies, these two countries desperately fought each other over foreign influence, inspiring what is known as the Cold War. Named for it’s lack of military action, the Cold War was hardly a war at all but more an arms race between American democracy and Russian Communism. Though it never felt the heat of battle, this altercation between the two Superpowers (the U.S. and the Soviet Union) included one of the quickest advancements of military technology in global history. Inspired by fear of parity, the United States …show more content…

This thermonuclear warhead absorbed a radius over 100 square miles wide and 25 miles high and, “ gave the United States a short-lived advantage in the nuclear arms race with the Soviet Union. Following the successful Soviet detonation of an atomic device in September 1949, the United States accelerated its program to develop the next stage in atomic weaponry,” ("United States Tests First Hydrogen Bomb"). The Soviet Union later replied to this by setting off yet another thermonuclear bomb. Though it did not have the 100 square mile radius of a multi-stage H-bomb, it was small enough to be carried on a plane and was ready for use, unearthing the Soviet Union as a further threat to U.S. Over time, “The U.S.S.R. sought to develop bigger, more powerful bombs to make up for what they perceived to be a disadvantage in the accuracy and reliability of their nuclear delivery systems,” ("Soviet Hydrogen Bomb …show more content…

These missiles were a critical product of the Cold War itself. Following the introduction of the IBM’s, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles coined the policy known as “Massive retaliation” , dictating that any major Soviet attack would be met with a massive nuclear response. Inspired by fear and skeptical assumptions of what the Soviet Union could do, this policy in turn acted as an empty unneeded form of retaliation, attempting to discourage any possible Soviet Union capitalization. But, after all these threats, Dulles acts upon this assumption declaring that “the United States will protect its allies through the “deterrent of massive retaliatory power.” The policy announcement was further evidence of the Eisenhower administration’s decision to rely heavily on the nation’s nuclear arsenal as the primary means of defense against communist aggression,” (“Dulles Announces Policy of “massive Retaliation”). Later, in the 1960’s, the strategic doctrine known as “Mutually Assured Destruction” was developed as a scapegoat in case Russia ever gained superiority over the United States. Declaring that “if Russia attacked the west, the west would make sure that they would suitably retaliate,” (Trueman).This doctrine was declared under the knowledge that “the nuclear firepower of both the US and USSR was capable of utterly

Get Access