Score I believe I deserve (out of possible 175 points):__165__
Why: I checked every requirements in the grading box, I spent three days on it but I think I still have some grammar mistakes.
ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC POLICY DEBATE
RELATED TO MULTICULTURALISM
Different countries with different culture always have various international relation policies, these policies might affect the world's activities, economic wars and even human beings' safties. For example, EU countries like France keeps a liberalism trategy, Asian country like China is always more friendly in International Relations while the United States showed its power with more than twenty times of invasion to other countries in last few decades. Right after the tragedy happend
…show more content…
Nuclear weapons are also called nuclear or atomic weapons. Broadly speaking of nuclear weapons, including throwing or launching systems, refers to the combat capabilities of nuclear-weapons systems. Usually refers to the narrow of nuclear weapons, that is, nuclear warhead and guidance, penetration and other devices mounted warhead shell of a nuclear bomb. Nuclear warheads are the subject of a nuclear explosive device, referred to as nuclear installations. Detonated nuclear devices and control systems to form a nuclear warhead. Nuclear warhead and guidance, penetration and other devices mounted warhead shell constitutes a ballistic missile nuclear warhead. Generalized often refers to the bombs, throwing nuclear weapons systems and command and control, communication and operation support system, has the combat capability of the nuclear weapons. As Nuclear power developed so fast, how to keep this unsafe power safe become a big problem. United States, as the only country who used nuclear weapons on military, had made a huge nuclear accident. March 28, 1979, at 4 o'clock in the morning, United States at Pennsylvania's Three Mile Island nuclear power plant in the 2nd group of the reactor's operations room, a large amount of radioactive material overflow. In the Three Mile Island incident, starting from the initial fault of …show more content…
However, it is true that wars have to be cruel, or people will like it. On July 1, 1968, Treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons opened for signature in Washington, Moscow, London, there were 59 countries signed up to join. The purpose of the Treaty was to prevent nuclear proliferation, promoting nuclear disarmament and promoting international cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. The Treaty entered into force in March 1970. As of January 2003, a total of 186 States parties to the Treaty. There are 11 article provides in total, main content is, has nuclear national shall not to any directly or indirectly transfer nuclear weapons or nuclear explosion device, not help manufacturing nuclear weapons; seedless country guarantee not developed, and not accept and not seeks gets nuclear weapons; stop the nuclear arms race, promoted nuclear disarmament; put peace nuclear facilities placed International Atomic Energy institutions of international guarantees. As President Obama stated in Berlin in 2013, the United States is prepared to negotiate further nuclear reductions with Russia of up to one-third in the deployed strategic warhead levels established in the New Start
On February 5th 2011, the NEW START Treaty between the United Stated and Russia that was signed on April 8th 2010 entered into force. The treaty between this two world powers is a measurement for further reduction and limitation of strategic arms and nuclear arsenal. Both United States and the Russian administration have to meet the treaty’s limitation and reduction of their nuclear strategic weapons by February 5th 2018. The New START Treaty establishes a strategic stability between the world two biggest nuclear powers. The Treaty has strengthened US –Russian relationships and a new stability for the non-proliferation era and has placed nuclear inspection sites in
Two main theorists of international relations, Kenneth Waltz and Scott Sagan have been debating on the issue of nuclear weapons and the proliferation of nuclear weapons in the 21st century. In their book The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: An Enduring Debate, they both discuss their various theories, assumptions and beliefs on nuclear proliferation and nuclear weapons. To examine why states would want to attain/develop a nuclear weapon and if increasing nuclear states is a good or bad thing. In my paper, I will discuss both of their theories and use a case study to illustrate which theory I agree with and then come up with possible solutions of preventing a nuclear war from occurring.
The dropping of the atomic bomb was the first of many nuclear projects. The first project was called the Manhattan project. Three bombs were created, one was a test, and the two others were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, cities in Japan. These bombs created mass destruction for the two cities; buildings were obliterated, fires erupted, and radiation spread for miles. After foreign countries saw what the United States was capable of, countries all around the world started to develop their own nuclear weapons, creating a surplus of weapons of mass destruction. “Today, eight countries in the world have nuclear arsenals (weapon supplies). The United States and Russia (formerly part of the Soviet Union) have most of the world’s nuclear weapons. Other countries with nuclear arms include China, France, India, Israel, Pakistan, and the United Kingdom” (Kroenig). Following World War Two, the Soviet Union and the United States were leaders of nuclear weapons. This period was called the Cold War. Forty-five years of potential nuclear destruction loomed over the Soviets and Americans. It wasn’t until after the Cold War that diplomats created the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty. The Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty, or NPT for short, recognizes the United States, Russia, China, France, and the United Kingdom as nuclear weapon states. Nearly every country in the world is a member of the treaty, even if they do not possess nuclear weapons, by law they state that they are a nonnuclear
Since the invention of nuclear weapons, they have presented the world with a significant danger, one that was shown in reality during the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. However, nuclear weapons have not only served in combat, but they have also played a role in keeping the world peaceful by the concept of deterrence. The usage of nuclear weapons would lead to mutual destruction and during the Cold War, nuclear weapons were necessary to maintain international security, as a means of deterrence. However, by the end of the Cold War, reliance on nuclear weapons for maintaining peace became increasingly difficult and less effective (Shultz, et. al, 2007). The development of technology has also provided increasing opportunities for states
“A nuclear bomb is defined as ‘an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission or a combination of fission and fusion. Both reactions release vast quantities of energy from relatively small amounts of matter.’ “
The first use of nuclear weaponry in warfare occurred on the morning of August 6, 1945 when the United States dropped the atomic bomb known as “Little Boy” on Hiroshima, Japan. The result was devastating, demonstrating the true power of nuclear warfare. Since the incident, the world has been left fearing the possible calamity of another nuclear war. Joseph Siracusa’s Nuclear Weapons: A Very Short Introduction explains aspects of nuclear weaponry from simply what a nuclear weapon is, to the growing fear from nuclear warfare advancements in an age of terrorism. The book furthered my education on nuclear weapons and the effect they place on society, physically and mentally.
Having adopted the Nonproliferation Treaty in 1970, as well as keeping in mind the New START treaty in the Obama administration, the leaders of America and leaders around the world has come to the consensus that it is best to ban the use of nuclear weapons. As the public opinion of nuclear technology is usually negative, many would agree that a nuclear war could be dangerously fatal for lives world wide, therefore our group agrees that it is wise to be wary of powerful nations in possession of such hazardous and forceful arm, including our very nation, the United
In addition to the nuclear technology applied to its naval vehicles, the military has also applied nuclear technology to its missiles.A nuclear weapon is defined as something that explodes using the power unleashed by splitting the
A nuclear weapon is one that possess enormous destruction power derived from nuclear fission which is either a nuclear reaction or a radioactive decay that eventually lead to a massive release of a large amount of energy. Throughout history many nuclear weapons have been developed and used. Over time a simple scientific discovery has manifested itself into a massive and destructive yet very important piece of history that has greatly affected the world today.
After World War II, countries raced to develop and hoard nuclear weapons. Seemingly learning nothing from the atomic bombs detonated on Nagasaki and Hiroshima, nuclear weapons became necessary for smaller countries to have when their larger neighbors, like Soviet Russia and the United States, had enough to kill the world a few times over. America began to understand the gravity of nuclear arms when less predictable countries became armed similarly. In 1968, the nuclear Nonproliferation Act was signed by many nations, but through the decades violations of the treaty have been common .
The Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is a treaty signed by one hundred and ninety states used to slow down the spread of a large number of nuclear weapons while promoting the use of nuclear technologies in peaceful ways such as energy. Its purpose is to keep nuclear technology in “Nuclear States” or trusted countries until a long-term goal of total disarmament can be reached. Even though it tries to bring about nuclear disarmament, the NPT is a threat to the modern world. It is currently speculated that the United States has the most stockpiled Nuclear weapons with Russia being a close second. Each of these countries has “thousands of known stockpiled nuclear weapons with the next closest state having just a few hundred” (Rising Powers
When are the circumstances under which it is or is not legitimate to use military force against another group or country?
Equally important to the safety standards forced upon nuclear engineers, is the prospect of nuclear weapons proliferation as a byproduct of energy production. It has been a topic of debate since the mid-1940s when the first nuclear bombs were being produced for war under the United States Manhattan Project, and since then has received varied attention throughout the years. In its simplest form, there is concern that the same technologies that are being used to produce nuclear power, may also be able to allow access to nuclear weapons in the process. The Nuclear Threat Initiative covers these issues, pointing explicitly to fuel enrichment and reprocessing as the most dangerous. It is believed that high-grade uranium (which is only used in laboratory
The Cold War is over and some people believe that we do not need nuclear deterrence anymore. The U.S.S.R has fallen and Russia poses little threat to launch a nuclear attack on the United States. Because of this, Russia and the United States have begun disarming their nuclear weapons. The United States has reduced its nuclear stockpile of warheads from 31,265 in 1965 to about 10,455 in 2002, enough to use for deterrence ("Table of . . . "). This disarming agreement is only between these two countries and they will continue to keep a minimum number of these nuclear warheads to deter other countries. They realize that they are not a threat to each other,
Due to the severity and danger of nuclear weapons, it is very important for nations to have some sort of regulation with regard to the nuclear program and more specifically their nuclear weapons program. After the first nuclear bomb was created by the U.S. nations states that followed the U.S. with the creation of a nuclear bomb seek to justify their creation of the nuclear. There are many reasons why a nation state will create a nuclear bomb but the key issue here is why and how nations states should be regulated with regard to nuclear weapons development. If Iran is considered a potentially hostile regime based on the perspective of western allies it would be logical to attempt to negotiate with them so that their nuclear program can have some type of regulation rather than no regulation at all or striving to strong arm them from developing their nuclear program and possibly a nuclear weapons program.