preview

Oedipus Downfall

Decent Essays

Aristotle describes a tragedy as “An imitation of an action that is serious, complete and of a certain magnitude", describing a person who has good intentions but a fatal flaw in his character. In essence, this flaw ultimately leads to a tragic ending, as the hero becomes the victim of his own actions. In Sophocles Oedipus the King, Oedipus defines his outcome as one by harmatia, as the narrative exposes his arrogant trait to blame for his downfall. To begin, it is essential to note his nature to be good hearted, as he truly cares for Thebes and his people. His role within the narrative further justifies his protagonist status, as gives examples of courage and bravery. However, his ignorance further enables him to act illogically, as Oedipus basis his judgments off of anger. This is not only seen when unintentionally killing his father, but by how he bullies others when he is unhappy with results. Hence, his inability to handle displeasing information shows …show more content…

With his arrogant state causing him to remain both ignorant and blind to his surroundings, it ultimately leads him to his tragic downfall. Therefore, his good character suffers from his inherent trait, causing his doom to be the act of hamartia.
To understand Oedipus’s character as a whole, one must discuss his good or bad qualities. Foremost, the current King in this narrative is a respectable character, in carrying major traits to justify his status. As a reader expects from a hero, he is courageous. This is evident within to text as it mentions Oedipus saving Thebes from the sphinx, who ultimately dies after Oedipus solves a riddle. His courageous discipline encourages determination

Get Access