3) On what basis could County argue that it is conforming with the criterion at 1715(3)? On what basis could the state agency argue that County's application in nonconforming with the criterion? In your opinion, which side has the more persuasive argument? Why? In the given case, County’s application is nonconforming with that criterion because in usually when there is some conflict occurred or both the parties go with opposite opinion at an issue, then they generally approaches to the courts to get acceptable solution. In this case, open heart surgery, no party will wait, it can be given to them who have truth with them, and the other who does not have truth they will be rejected. In addition, generally the state agencies have complete awareness
2. Is there evidence of disparate impact against African Americans in the decisions that were made? On what basis did you arrive at this position? Illustrate how the “80 percent rule” can be used with the data in Exhibit 3.2.1 and whether there was a violation of this rule.
A forum applies its own choice of law approach. So here North Montana will apply the Second Restatement of Conflicts of Laws as the state follows that approach. Under the Second Restatement, three main steps need to be considered: 1) whether the conflict is procedural or substantive, 2) whether a choice of law provision in a contract should be applied, and 3) the application of a choice of law rule. Here, it appears that the choice of law provision selecting Old York should be applied because none of the exceptions to the general rule apply.
12. What was the effect of the lifting of the requirement mentioned in question 11?
Respondent understudies brought an activity against applicant school area affirming infringement of the Foundation Clause of U.S. Const. change. I (Establishment Clause) for candidate's approach of understudy drove petition earlier to class football games. The trial court urged candidate from actualizing the arrangement as it stood, yet allowed an altered strategy. Both sides bid. The re-appraising court asserted, with changes, holding that both strategies disregarded the Establishment Clause. Candidate requested of for a writ of certiorari, guaranteeing its approach did not abuse the Foundation Clause on the grounds that the football game messages were private understudy discourse, not open discourse. The Court confirmed, holding that the re-appraising court appropriately verified that applicant's strategies disregarded the Establishment Statement on the grounds that the football game messages were open discourse approved by an administration approach and occurring on government property at government-supported school-related occasions, and on the grounds that the substances of solicitor's approach included both saw and real government support of the conveyance of supplication at vital school
The issue is whether Valley Memorial Hospital (VMH) is liable for a disparate treatment race discrimination in violation of Title VII when they did not promote Ms. Crow (Crow) to Unit Manager.
DOI: 11/24/2011. The patient is a 48-year-old female home health aide who sustained injury while turning a patient in bed to put a clean pad when the bed moved. Per OMNI, the patient is diagnosed with L4-5 disc herniation with annular tear and left knee radicular syndrome. She has undergone posterolateral and interbody fusion at L4-5 on 02/18/2013.
The main question in this exercise is whether North Montana will apply the choice of law provision in the contract between Good Hands and the Walmsleys. A forum applies its own choice of law approach. So here the North Montana Court will apply the Second Restatement of Conflicts of Laws as the state follows that approach. Under the Second Restatement, three main steps need to be considered: 1) whether the conflict is procedural or substantive, 2) whether there is a choice of law provision in the contract, and whether that provision should be applied, and 3) the application of the choice of law rules from the Second Restatement. Here, it appears that the choice of law provision selecting Old York should be applied because none of the exceptions to the general rule apply.
We leveraged the STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database to characterize institutional variability in HAI rates. These findings are important for at least three reasons. First, our study reflects the largest series to characterize the variability in HAIs in the setting of isolated CABG surgery. We found rates vary between 0-38.5% across the 1,084 hospitals participating in the STS ACSD. Second, while we have more broadly characterized HAIs that in other series to include pneumonia, presence of HAI was associated with risk of further morbidity and mortality. For instance, there was an absolute difference of 9.3% in rates of major morbidity or mortality across hospital HAI strata. Third, we identify a number of patient and process measures that
The case I chose was published in The Baltimore Sun. The title of the article is, Prosecutors: No Charges against Baltimore officer who used Taser on teen. This article is about a 19 year-old teen named George Vonn King Jr. who died from cardiac arrest. The article states that Mr. King was tased several times by police, before going into cardiac arrest (George). This incident took place at the “MedStar Good Samaritan hospital” in Baltimore MD, where Mr. King was admitted as a patient. Mr. King suffered from Meningitis which causes seizures, along with aggressive behavior. When King was asked by hospital staff to move to the intensive care unit, he became aggressive, which may have been because of the medication he received (George). Hospital
(b) is not the subject of an order of or a declaration by the Governor in Council made pursuant to section 10 or 20 of this Act or section 18 of the former Act;
Denies cardiac surgery or hospitalization for cardiac evaluation or disorder, congenital heart defect, or vascular procedures
7.Recommend two (2) types of reasonable accommodations for both disabled applicants and applicants needing special religious considerations. Argue two (2) legal reasons for not being able to sufficiently provide such reasonable accommodation for each group.
7. Explain why the results in Requirement 1, Part D, and Requirement 6 differ. Be specific.
Back in November 2015 I underwent a heart valve repair and bypass, was not aware that I had had a heart attack in the paste, found out later that these are known as a silent attack. Immediately after my operation I started to notice the change in how I felt within.
It was the winter of 2013; I could hear my heartbeat get louder and louder as I was anxiously waiting to hear back from the doctor. Not a second passed by that I was not praying for my dad’s life. Finally, a kindhearted nurse practitioner walked through the door to give us the latest update on my dad’s condition. Her optimistic words and positive attitude gave me every ounce of hope I needed to cling onto. My dad was fighting for his life in the operating room. This was his second open heart surgery caused by a rupture mitral valve. The urgency of the situation was intensified by the backflow of blood to his lungs. My family and I had no other choice but to consent to the risky operation that had a fifty percent survival possibility. Prior to the heart attack that left him in critical state, he had given up on doctor prescribed medication and instead turned to herbal therapy. He was consuming some unusual looking liquid contained in a large amber bottle that he had brought back from Pakistan. Upon asking he expressed his frustration in complying with his doctor prescribed heart regimen. At the time I tried my best to convince him of the danger of discontinuing his heart medication but all in vain. He had found ease in taking the liquid herbs and also felt much better without all the side effects. After the nightmare we lived through, he has promised to comply with his medication. However, he still constantly complains about the side effects he experiences and his