The economic growth story is as long as the history of economic thought. Since the early classics like Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Thomas Malthus studied the issue of growth or introduced fundamental concepts such as diminishing returns and their relationship with the accumulation of physical or human capital, the relationship between technological progress and labor specialization or focus competitive analysis tool dynamic equilibrium.
As part of these theories appears arises that relationship between trade openness and economic growth is positive. These theories between trade openness and economic growth can be located more than 200 years, with the mercantilist theories. Under these concepts, International trade benefited a nation
…show more content…
There are several authors that put emphasis on the role of international trade as the main conduit of economic development. Influential papers in this school include Sach and Warner (1995), Frankel and Romer (1999), and Dollar and Kraay (2003). In these papers, trade strongly fosters economic convergence among countries and regions.
The degree of trade openness has been a topic of debate in the literature in recent years for its effect on the growth of countries. There are many measures Some authors argue that trade openness is positive because to diversify the supply and provision of goods and services to a emergency.
The other position assumes that trade liberalization does not imply any benefit as all internalize external shock quickly. Dollar and Kraay (2001) argue that countries with higher trade liberalization or "globalized" tend to grow faster than non-global.
In contrast, Birdsall and Hamoudi (2002) argue that countries dependent on primary products have a lower rate growth and trade liberalization is not the only factor impact on growth but also the composition of exports. These authors divided the country in "very dependent "or" less dependent "on natural resources and equated to the terminology of Dollar and Kraay (2001) of countries globalized and non-globalized.
Birdsall and Hamoudi also argue that there are other elements linked to trade liberalization, and out of control authorities affecting the use of
Trade is now more important than in the recent past and as a result, world trade has expanded rapidly in recent years. Irwin also points out the flaws in measures of openness when traded alone and given the fact that intermediated goods often cross borders several times during the production process. Nowadays, thanks to the reduction of legal trade restrictions, commercial integration become greater than before. And for greater integration, Irwin suggests some reasons such as income growth in the OECD countries and worldwide reductions in tariffs and transportation costs.
Many indicators serve to measure the degree of trade openness. The first is designed to assess directly the level of economy openness to foreign trade. The degree of openness measures the level of the external constraint and it is obtained by the ratio of the value of foreign trade on the GDP. The second indicator (distortion) aims to measure the impacts of protectionist policies of a country.
The Ancient Greek civilization is noted for presenting the ideas of perfection in daily life. Many of the things they did were a result of wanting to maintain their ideal image of how Greek civilians should live, by sophrosyne which was being able to have self-control, restraint and living in moderation. Sophrosyne would lead to kalokagathia, the Greek way of viewing the world interacting with polar opposites in order to produce a change and ultimately lead to areté, reaching one’s highest potential or excellence. Greek architecture was influenced by these ideas. The Erechtheum (ca.
There is no doubt that increasing in international trade is supporting the economic growth across the world, raising incomes and creating jobs. However, international trade can also some create economic obstacles, such as the international context and the market policy and regulations of each country, and consequently it can be said that the effects would have positive and negative sides, and it is useful to mention all of them and to take them into consideration.
However, it was apparent to economists that nations with similar resource endowments exchanged similar products with each other. Economists felt that trade explained solely by comparative advantage was an incomplete analysis of international trade. Furthermore, since the classical trade theory was unable to explain intraindustry trade, economists decided to expand on the classical trade theory by creating a new theory of trade (Carbaugh, 2011). The new theory states that economies of scale provide incentive for a country to specialize in a particular product (Carbaugh, 2011). Furthermore, based on economies of scale, nations with similar factor endowments will trade with each other as sometimes it is beneficial (Carbaugh, 2011). Arguments stemming from this new trade theory puts the economic case for free trade in doubt.
Those economically disadvantaged (poor) within a country generally gain from a loose trade. A loose trade is generally a strong positive contributor to poverty reduction. This allows people to exploit their productive potential, assists economic growth, restrains illogical policy interventions and helps to insulate against shocks. This corresponds with a new World Bank study which, used data from 80 countries over four decades, confirmed that openness boosts economic growth and that the incomes of the poor rose one-for-one with overall growth.
Both the traditional free trade version and new international trade theories failed address the dynamic implication of trade opening in terms of economic development and growth of the training partners, especially so for the developing countries. Unrealistic classical and more realistic new version of trade theories failed to address the issue of economic development and growth which include, “viewing change by comparing static equilibrium states, rather than as a process occurring in historical irreversible time (Bhattacharjea
Trade freedom is a highly important factor in determining economic freedom and wealth. No one single country has the resources required to sustain the current standards of living in developed or developing nations. Trade requires specialization according to a country’s comparative advantage. Specialization allows the most efficient and effective use of a country’s scarce resources, whether that be natural resources or labor resources. The Index shows the economic benefits of specialization and trade.
Countries are enabled by free international trade to specialise or to focus in the production of the goods in which they have a comparative advantage. Specialisation countries can take the benefit of efficiencies generated from increased output and economies of trade. The size of the firm’s market are increased by the international trade which results in lower average costs and increasing in productivity, as it ultimately leads to increase in production.
International trade theories explain international trade patterns. Academics see trade as the interdependence of states through the exchange of capital, goods, and services. International trade has existed for thousands of years in the world. Its economic, political and social influence in the world has begun rise. However, new trade theories include Porter 's diamond national competitive advantage which focuses on modern trade concept. This paper will discuss Porter 's diamond national competitive advantage and the extent to which their link to the new trade theories contrast with the neoclassical view of trade. The author will then discuss how government policies could influence trade pattern.
Trade plays a key role in stimulating economies. It promotes sustainable economic growth and development. However, for this to happen there needs to be openness. This paper is going to discuss how increasing the level of openness of developing nations can lead to increased economic growth. The paper will also review some of the dynamic gains that can be made from trade before concluding with a discussion of the roles of global trade organizations in promoting economic development. These discussions will be supported with examples of nations that have excelled in the various aspects that will be discussed.
Going into deeper details, we need to know the meaning of “openness”. Nowadays the word openness is highly associated with ‘free trade’ that indicates no distortion in the trade system. Hence, it is crucial to understand the problem of openness definition, before moving to the theoretical implications and the linkages with growth of the economy. Furthermore, Thirlwall (2011 p.515) highlights that we need to be aware that trade openness has different meaning with trade liberalization.
Firstly, International trade is the trading of products and ventures crosswise over worldwide outskirts. It makes the economy to make utilization of the characteristic assets for the creation of merchandise and how it 's most appropriate. It has been discussed that international trade arises when a country specializes in the production of certain goods and thus it produces more than what is needed to supply the domestic demand and therefore it exports the surplus (Collings, 1929). Also, it empowers a nation to acquire products are not produced in the economy as it may be expensive by bringing in from different nations at lower costs. Another thing is that it increases efficiency due to the international competition, each producer tries to produce the better quality goods (Collings, 1929). On the other hand, international trade may have a negative
The level of economic openness in European countries is high. The average openness is approximately 40% in EU member states (Mongelli, 2002), and there is an increasing trend in openness level over time (Table 1). This result shows that, in general, the import and export growth rate exceed the growth rate of GDP in EU12 countries during these years. It should be mentioned that, in Table 2, the intra-regional trade in the EU plays a significant role, it accounts for about 60% of the international trade (Laabas & Limam, 2002).
Despite the clamor of the classical economists about the advantages of the free trade, the policy has either not been adopted by many countries or abandoned by those who had already adopted it. Economic history indicates that for the last two centuries, international trade has developed with