Osama Bin Laden Research Paper

The government has been known to secretly kidnap people and kill or torture them. “In the years since 9/11, our government has illegally kidnapped, detained and tortured numerous prisoners” (ACLU). This shows how much power the government actually has. They have the ability to kidnap citizens and go undetected and under the radar. The government says that they are able to kidnap anybody if they believe that they could be a threat to the United States’ safety. This needless kidnapping goes against the constitution of the United States of America. There have been many times that the government has been caught torturing prisoners of war and possible terrorists. For example when George W. Bush was president there were multiple cases where the government was found out to have been torturing people. “Bush stood, the U.S. military ran the notorious School of the Americas from 1946 to 1984, a sinister educational institution that, if it had a motto, might have been "We do torture." It is here in Panama, and later at the school's new location in Fort Benning, Georgia, where the roots of the current torture scandals can be found” (Klein). Though it is illegal to torture prisoners on American soil, the American Military is notorious for doing it anyway. There is evidence of this happening on multiple occasions in multiple different places. Although, torture is illegal

"Intelligence derived from CIA detainees has resulted in more than 6,000 intelligence reports and, in 2004, accounted for approximately half of the [Counterterrorism Center's] reporting on al Qaeda” (Thiessen). It is the hope that eventually everyone will talk with the correct tactics. Even though it may take minutes, hours, days, or months this is better than not knowing at all. Gainful knowledge helps the US track terrorists, stop bombings, and detour other terrorist acts before they can happen. ." In other words, the terrorists are called by their faith to resist as far as they can -- and once they have done so, they are free to tell everything they know. This is because of their belief that "Islam will ultimately dominate the world and that this victory is inevitable." The job of the interrogator is to safely help the terrorist do his duty to Allah, so he then feels liberated to speak freely” (Thiessen). Saving lives of US citizens should be the priority not the safety of horrible terrorists that don’t care about American lives. Another reason that enhanced interrogations are important is only 1 person suffers instead of thousands if a terrorist attack is successful. The main goal of a terrorist is to destroy the safety and quality of the economy. Per the FBI “International terrorism involves violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a

The first reason why I believe that terror suspects be detained is so that no unfair trials would occur. If we have a trial for a suspected terror, it is most likely that the case would be held in a foreign country where it would be apprehended under different rules depending on the country's authority and government system. Therefore, the odds of our country winning the case would be very minor. The government in the foreign country's biggest concern would probably be to restore the peace and get the case over with and for that reason, they would most likely give us an unfair trial.

The torture of captured suspects is contrarian to the values of the American legal system because generally captured suspects are supposed to entitled to due process, according to Amendment V of the United States Constitution: “no person shall be . . . deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.” Guantanamo Bay”. Terrorist which are held captive by the American government are presumed guilty but are not being given a fair chance to seek representation in a court of law or have fall range access to their attorneys once they find themselves in a conflict. In my opinion, terrorists should have the opportunity to have their cases reviewed and be given a fighting chance instead of being held for an indefinite amount of time without due process or trial. The U.S

The CIA is interrogating two prisoners. The prisoner admits to the CIA that ISIS is planning another attack on United States in one of the major cities. He will not admit this information unless he is guaranteed that he will not be prosecuted or executed for being a part of ISIS. The other prisoner is guilty of carrying out bombing several government buildings in Washington D.C. He is responsible for murdering over 100 people. The CIA is only allowed to execute one of prisoners due to the President concern for other important issues. Would would you do?

Is waterboarding suspected terrorists at Guantanamo Bay justifiable in order to save American lives? For years since the attacks on 9/11, prisoners suspected of terrorist actions have been treated poorly and taken to bases like Guantanamo Bay where they are interrogated and abused past levels of legality. This is upsetting how the United States government tortures people only suspected of terrorist activity. There have been many incidents where innocent people were accused of terrorist activity and harassed. After the bombing of the Boston Marathon, three innocent muslim men were put in custody to answer some questions on the bombing (Friedersdorf). The innocent men had done nothing wrong but the United States has a history of fighting terrorism in a very forceful way. Is it “okay” to question anyone without legal justification? In the US, the fear of terrorism has

The circumstances that would be acceptable are if you know for sure that they are suspected of a war crime or is involved with terrorists. Unacceptable circumstances would be if you do not have crucial evidence against this person to charge them and kidnap them and torture them for evidence that they may not even have. The point of torturing is to get evidence right? So if they don 't have any, what was the point ? You would have wasted your time, while the real terrorist is out there plotting against the US. Admittedly torture is not okay if you do not have crucial evidence that the person is guilty and has evidence that can help you protect millions of civilians from another terrorists attack.

First, as established above, “torture” is not being used on suspected terrorists-- they are using stress and duress to extract information. Secondly, terrorists openly express their hate for this country and say they are proud of their actions; none have incriminated themselves by nothing more than the truth. A terrorist is not going to bluntly admit to something he/she did not do, even if he was severely tortured which they are not. Government documentation, the definition of the word torture, and 58% of our nation can prove that. Not to mention, a trial is costly. To fly a terrorist to our country to have a so-called “fair trial” is ridiculous and costs the people of this nation hard earned money to have this man put on trial. Not only is it costly, but it brings him/her into the country that his leaders and fellow terrorists spilt blood in. It is not only ethically incorrect to pay American money for these terrorists to have American rights; it is unconstitutional to not give someone a fair trial.

The United States promotes international freedom, and discourages any organization who is attempting to disrupt freedom. In recent years, terrorism has become one of the United States greatest dilemmas. Terrorism is a horrific crime against society, and the people who carry out these acts are considered people some of the worst criminals of today. Following September 11 the United States made a decision to wage war of terror. The United States “War on Terror” attempts confront these people and their organizations and remove them from power, bring peace to their home nation and hopefully establish international peace. (5) The war on terror is not only fought with guns and soldiers, but in the interrogation room as leaders attempted to learn more about the interworking of these dangerous groups. The men who are captured are dangerous and sometimes well connected leaders with lots of information. The question which logically arises after these men are detained, exactly what is the proper interrogation technique and exactly how far can we go to extract information. Clearly, any information these men have could save the lives of innocent people. Due to their knowledge terrorist cannot be imprisoned without making an attempt to learn what they know. This is where the War on Terror has created a huge moral dilemma, these men are dangerous and sometimes ruthless, but when they are in our hands what exactly is acceptable to save lives. Interrogation can quickly turn to torture as

In the case of Khaleid Sheik Mohammed(KSM) not only was he tortured; but his family that wasn’t captured was blown apart by drones in the operation. I do not advocate for the use of drones in most cases simply because not only are they less accurate, but they destroy any and all potential human intelligence in the operation. KSM’s family could have been complicit. But odds are that they had very little to do with the operations and very little choice in the matter as well. This has more to do with the cultural practices and norms of Muslims, especially in the society. Also, with those people being killed and assuming that they were innocent. You have now killed innocent people and made the detainee decidedly less cooperative.

Apparently the best-known Mujahideen outside the Islamic world, different approximately adjusted Afghan restriction aggregates at first opposed the legislature of the Soviet Democratic Republic of Afghanistan (DRA) during the late 1970s. At the DRA's ask for, the Soviet Union conveyed powers into the nation to help the administration from 1979. The Mujahideen battled against Soviet and DRA troops amid the Soviet War in Afghanistan (1979–1989) Afghanistan's resistance development began in disorder and, at to start with, territorial warlords pursued practically the greater part of its battling locally. As fighting turned out to be more complex, outside support and provincial coordination developed. The essential units of

The most important aspect of the scenario would be this, the individuals partaking in terrorism would have to give themselves to the U.S. military and agree that there is, in fact, a tolerable punishment; death is not being one of them. The reason death could not be an option is because ultimately the

This is mostly because the mechanism that Iraq, Turkey, and the allies apply against the ISIS troops. This might be not the best key answer to this issue. Is there no any other ways to solve this issue? Of course, there is other solution instead of bombing. The problem is they even break the war laws and they kill all of the troops that they arrest in the battles, and there is no exchange between the prisoners. Consequently, the governments should ban anything that can be used to motivate people to join the ISIS including social media any other types of communications. In addition, a good education that tell our children that the verge the ISIS is following is not the right track that Islam asks the people to follow. Here, the role of the Islamic leader’s scholars who are called ‘khatib’ is the most effective because people think that they are the ones who people should follow according to the Islam religion. We have to close all the doors against the ISIS in order to make them to surrender.

We can assume that a terrorist has the direct intent of sabotaging or committing malicious behavior. The idea of imprisonment can be based on the idea of it being a terrorist attack and deporting the person back to their country would just allow them to execute more attacks.

In addition to new security legislation, the United States also defies human rights standards through the treatment and legal status given to the Taliban and Al-Qaeda prisoners being held at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba. According to the Geneva Convention (1949), in which the United States is a party, a captured fighter is considered a prisoner of war if they are members of an adversary state's armed forces or are part of an identifiable military group that abides by the laws of war. Since most members of Al- Qaeda did not wear insignia or abide by the laws of war, they would probably not qualify as prisoners of war. However, Taliban soldiers comprised the armed forces of Afghanistan and should be entitled to POW status (http://www.hrw.org).