B. Indicators of Human Resources To obtain an indicator of adequate human resources is very difficult, because, as explained in advance, the dimensions of human resources is very broad, which includes both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the micro and macro scale. The following will discuss some of the indicators of human resources that can be used to assess the condition of human resources in an area. Quantitatively, HR can be seen in terms of number, for example the number of population, number of workers, and the labor force. But keep in mind that in order to obtain a true picture, these variables need to be combined with other variables, such as level of education, literacy, skills, and health status (life expectancy) (Widarti, 1993). Other variables that can be used, especially with regard to aspects of employment is derived variables LUA approach (Labor Utilization Approach) by Hauser (1974). In this approach the labor force can be divided into the labor force and are not fully utilized fully. Labor force that is not fully utilized can be divided into not used at all (unemployed) and underemployed (underemployment). Underemployed can be subdivided into underemployed according to working hours, wages, and mismatch. Briefly, these variables can be explained as follows. a. LFPR (labor force participation rate) is the ratio between the number of labor force to the working age population. b.
- Decent Essays
Measuring World Development Essay
- 825 Words
- 4 Pages
there are exceptions. These being Australia and New Zealand, which are classed as ‘developed’ countries. Other indicators of development that are being used today are the PQLI, which is the physical quality of life index. Also the IHSI, which is the International Human Suffering Index. The PQLI is a quantitative measure of development and can be calculated by taking the average of three variables. These are life expectancy, literacy rates,
- 825 Words
- 4 Pages
Decent Essays - Better Essays
Differences Between Oda And The Marshall Plan
- 3239 Words
- 13 Pages
After over four decades of development aid being directed at developing countries, the general assumption of commentators around the subject is that the majority of these recipients have witnessed very little or no economic growth, apart from a handful of countries such as South Korea and Botswana (Easterly, 2006). Further highlighting this point, Clemens (2004) observes that only five countries saw annual growth of over 7% over a 15 year period whilst 21 other recipients actually suffered negative
- 3239 Words
- 13 Pages
Better Essays