In schools students have low grades and other issues. One of those issues is that they don’t have enough motivation to learn and do their work. Their attendance is poor, they miss a great portion and that doesn’t allow them to learn what needs to be learned. Some schools have a low ranking and a low percentage of student success. In order to fix the issue, some schools have created a program called money for grades. The program is about the school paying their students for earning excellent grades. However, paying students for excellent grades can result in negative consequences. Implementing the program does not allow the students to really learn, it stresses them, and it is a trigger to an argument/ conflict. Paying students for exceptional …show more content…
Due to the fact that it stresses them they get sidetracked and end up being left behind. Stressed students are less productive and can’t quite understand what is being taught by the teacher. In the article “Paying Students for Good Grades” the author states “Paying students to get good grades doesn’t have any effect if they have no idea about how to get good grades” (Peterson). The students aren’t capable of earning worthy grades because they have no idea about what is required to earn them and that is stressful for them. There are other reasons why the cash for grades program stresses students, one of those reasons is because they end up getting pressured into working their butts off (metaphorically of course) to earn the grade required. These are the reasons why the idea is inconvenient, it stresses …show more content…
It can cause problems between parents and teachers resulting in the possibility of teachers taking it out on the students. In the article “Cash for Grades” Privately funded programs try paying students to boost achievement” the author stated “Many teachers also say paying students for grades leads to practical problems in their classrooms, including pressure to inflate grades and conflicts with students and parents” (Flannery). The cash for grades program can cause problems between students and teachers, as stated in the article by Mary Ellen Flannery, the students can end up getting angry because the teacher didn’t give them a favorable grade. It can also cause the problem of students expecting a compensation every time they do something. In her article “Why you shouldn’t pay children for Grades” McCready stated “Though you may see initial improvement, numerous studies have shown that over time rewards dampen excitement over a task-exactly the opposite of what we’re going for.” The fact that rewards are going to end up “dampening excitement over a task” is going to cause problems because if it gets dampened students aren’t going to want to work hard in order to achieve the grade required to get paid. This is why the program is unsuitable, it is a trigger to an argument/
If students are rewarded for quality schoolwork, grades may initially improve. They may show more excitement. However, in the article “Why You Shouldn’t Pay Children for Grades” by Amy Mccready, it is found that the enhanced grades deteriorate along with the excitement for the payment. Most children simply lose interest in the reward. It is better to just let youth accomplish
First off, school requires a mental effort which by definition is considered to be work. Since we go to school for 8 hours every day and do that about 180 days per year, we should get paid if we keep our grades up because it’s hard to do. Keeping good grades requires lots of hard work and effort. It also requires time, which some of us
If they give these students money, they’ll never have any motivation to go to class. Many of them don’t want to go already, combined with the fact that some may be receiving grades without doing any work. Money will only add to this fact.
Getting paid for good grades has changed many people's lives and also changed their grades and knowledge. Wouldn't you want money for grades change your life too? Kids should get paid for grades to help the people who can't afford a simple,nice meal. Also, to keep their grades up and act like school is their job, because basically, it is. To begin with, many families need the money to survive and thrive.
School is slave labor. Rather than enjoying or learning from their classes, students are forced to do useless work that will often be forgotten immediately. Grades are meant to show much a student understands a class, but instead are used as a scale of how well a student can regurgitate answers onto a test. Students only work for good grades because of the threat of being punished for failure, and the promise of reward for passing. The punishments in this case are detention or trouble from teachers, and the rewards are making the honor roll or getting bragging rights. The real reward for learning should be having new knowledge, but this is not taken into consideration. Jerry Farber, a professor at U.S.D, made the strong claim that grades are useless and harmful in his essay, “A Young Person’s Guide to the Grading System.” I wholeheartedly agree with Farber’s objection to our current grading system.
The incentive program does not work for everyone so by using this policy it will not be effective for all of the students within the school. Theoretically, if this practice is in use, the rate of cheating will increase dramatically due to the desire for the rewards. Students potentially will see a greater need to obtain excelling grades and resort to cheating as a way to do it with the smallest amount of work possible. No matter what teacher any student has, no one can catch all forms of cheating within their
Although she has many good points, I disagree. Students should not get paid to have good grades and to stay in school. I do believe that students should get good grades and stay in school, but should not receive payment for something most students are already forced to do. Let's face it, what student, on the brink of dropping out, is going to stay in school just to earn ten measly dollars. Some say only students who acquire good grades should receive payment. So with that taken into account, there are many questions that need to be asked, such as what grade point average is considered to be good, how much will students be getting paid for this certain grade point average, how will students get paid, cash, check, debit card, lunch money, and the list just continues on. A study conducted by Harvard Crimson showed that although when students were provided financial incentives to score well on tests, the students being paid actually did not do any better than the students
“Why can’t our hard work have an income?”. Almost all students have had a similar thought at a time in their lives. To them, the incessant striving and vassalage they do for school deserves a salary. However, the situation with the exchange of grades for payment is a problematic state of affairs. In the predicament of schools giving students this opportunity, it will certainly lead to catastrophic events for all parties involved, especially, in the long run. Insightful to the statistics and evidence of both standpoints, school payment for grades is a situation best abstained because it causes quagmires. In agreement with this, say it causes conflicts, it’s only short-term, and causes negative impacts in the long run. By not paying students, you avoid turmoil, cut out a short-term motivator, and allow their future selves a better chance academically.
More than half of the students in any school show they learn more and understand more when doing an activity that involves moving around. Students getting paid is like and activity, they will learn more because they are working for something every month. A school in Massachusetts has started paying kids to work and learn and when they have testing, studies show their scores go up. Being paid isn't a big reward but when you're in high school you might need a car, or your parents might tell you to pay for your own things like clothes, so you will need a little money. It has its advantages and disadvantages but paying students will help kids have a better education and have a better experience at school and have a brighter future.
It’s gone on for a long time in corporate America. I feel that it can be effective incentive as long as you’re using it as a teachable moment to tell them about budgeting and saving.” The source that supports this quote is, “Praireecothrifter.com- Should Parents Pay for Good Grades?” But undoubtedly this can be denounced because even if teachers do pay kids for acceptable grades, what do they teachers get out of it? Higher test scores? Better grades? The students won’t really learn anything. For the reasons above, students should not be paid for acceptable
This article analyzes on how being paid for good grades isn’t so great. Reason being the author states because they think certificates were better , only because you can get a certificate for showing that you were always in school. You can't really do that with money , certificates were more cost effective. The author also stated that
Kids should get paid for good grades because they will start reading more, in a school in Dallas, TX. They start to pay two dollars for each book kids read, they actually became better readers, they started to understand things better, the test scores begin to get highly raised up. The other people that are in the opposite side may say that, this is bad for young people and they will became interested and will just want to do the things just if there's money involved and they will, not do it if they don't get payed for what they do, and if they don't get payed or if they get late payed they will go down, but they are all wrong because probably, with all the things that they learn will keep going up. Don't you guys want your kids to subside in school?
Underperforming schools are a mess. The students don’t behave, get bad grades and bring down the school’s reputation. Schools like these are most likely to have not as many students succeed in graduating. They are the schools that have the run down playgrounds, old textbooks, and no technology. The Cash for Grades program is supposed to be a program that can end all of this. This program basically speaks for itself, it gives students the opportunity to earn money be getting good grades. Paying students to get good grades is a horrible idea. This is a bad idea because an enlargement in cheating would take place in schools, kids would start only doing things for money, and it is a waste of our tax payer’s money.
What would happen if students are paid? If schools truly want students to learn they shouldn’t pay students for good grades. Paying students for their grades can lead to lower academic performances. In addition, the students who are getting payed will dampen their natural enthusiasm for learning. It also gives kids unneeded pressure extra pressure. Paying students for good grade is a bad idea because they will have lower academic performances, their enthusiasm will dampen and students will have unneeded extra pressure.
[W.M. Mcgovern] Ginger Ninja Essay quotes “paying students explains to them why they need to work hard in life”. This means that paying students for good grades in school will help them learn to not give on something that might be difficult. The effect of this is when students see that they will complete tasks that are difficult for them and to never give up on. All in all shouldn’t students experience the personal gain that comes from the persistence of completing a frustrating activity at school. Another reason why schools should pay students for good grades is because there will be higher test scores. Chan-Ginger Ninja Essay “ In Dallas Texas 10,000 students passed the advanced test for a reward, 400 dollars”. This means that students that get paid or reward learn more and lead to higher test scores. The effect of this is that the students who get paid for good grades will get higher scores on their test, that means they will get more graduates. In conclusion higher test scores mean Graduation and they will want to learn