Pegasus Fvey Case

|Source 1 Title and Citation: The Cybercrime Treaty Will Improve the Global Fight Against Internet Crime |

De Villiers, Meiring. 2010. Information Security Standards and Liability. Journal of Internet Law 13.7 Retrieved from

The Internet crimes can often overlap between fraud and other crimes. Because of these overlapping crimes it is important the there is communication and cooperation between our own agencies and international agencies.

The internet has brought upon a new revolution of global interconnection where contacting someone on the other side of the world is just a click away, but with this international phenomenon comes an increased susceptibility with unfamiliar technology. Internet crime is compiled of all non-physical crime with the aid of a computer. Although broad in definition internet crimes are largely composed of acts such as cyber fraud, ‘phishing’ (username and password hacking), cyber stalking and hacking. Internet crime does not pose an overwhelming issue in society in terms of its

Jurisdiction is the most prominent issue for enforcement officers to deal with international crimes stemming from the deep web. There are illegal markets for gambling, weapons, explosives, assassinations, exotic animals, terrorism and hacktivism all of which can be accessed by anyone in the world if they knew the right ways to get in. The darknet has an international customer base, and cases can get even more complicated when criminals from different countries start to work together. Questions of which country’s law should be followed and what punishment should be given arise, and not all parties involved end up satisfied. While it is impossible to please everyone with a trial and punishment, having an international court disfuses any issue concerning jurisdiction in order to deal with the criminal.

The Internet is unquestionably having a profound impact on many aspects of social, culture, economic, and legal systems throughout the world, moreover, enabling significant advances in global communication technologies, that make it more possible to contemplate the development of a more complex global information society. Such a global society offers many benefits to humankind, but incorporating regulation to enable and promote these information societies present challenges. However, such challenges create difficult questions for those making legal decisions: Do real world laws apply to virtual world problems? Can the laws adapt to regulate such activities? Are existing laws outdated and inadequate? Will new laws be required to suite Internet activities and other information technology developments?

At the beginning of the second millennium, an era of information society, based on the increasing use of computers, computer technology, information technology, making available "everything to everyone, everywhere and always" very urgent problem of improving the legislation in the fight against various kinds of offenses in this area, and first of all crimes. Currently, computer crime, has acquired an international dimension, is already receiving an adequate assessment of the international community, in particular, is reflected in a special Convention on Cybercrime, signed in 2001 in Budapest, representatives of 30 countries, members of the Council of Europe. The scale of a virtual crime using the internet in the US can be seen from the following

This ability to country-hop, one of the Internet’s greatest strengths, creates enormous jurisdictional and administrative problems for the police and is one of the main reasons why cybercrime investigation is so challenging and often feckless. A police officer in Paris has no authority to make an arrest in Sao Paulo.

Recently as a result of the advancement in technology, the government must monitor what happens online. No longer do they not only have to monitor what happens in real time but what also happens within internet content, online post and websites. The Internet is a

Technology has been advancing worldwide over the course of history, the successful innovations that were created to make the modern world possible eventually conspired to cause a great danger for today’s technology. Society has reached a critical point when the 21st century launched, and with it comes the technological mishaps erupting along with solutions. Cyberterrorism and Identity theft are well-known criminal acts that can potentially be a greater danger to humanity, especially as time passes since their technology improves immeasurably. Having two of the most known networked crimes becoming one single organization could be a desolation towards an age of corruption on the internet. It will only get worse if prevention does not improve.

Keeping in mind the end goal to include all partners and guarantee complete cybersecurity insurances, national governments are regularly in the best position to actualize new security strategies. These approaches ought to touch on a wide range of regions including highlighting the significance of ICTs to the country; recognizing and breaking down the dangers from digital wrongdoing and assaults; building up targets, for example, anticipation, identification and arraignment of digital violations; and setting an arrangement to accomplish these destinations that subtle elements the partners ' parts and obligations regarding information security and cybersecurity. I believed the new technology can be regulated, with intelligence and cybersecurity it can be done.

An invisible war is raging between cybercriminals and those who wish to make the virtual world a safer place, but the laws that could change the tides of this war are being called into question. Cybercrimes are a virtual epidemic that is sweeping the online world with crimes constantly posing as a threat such as identity theft, hacking, cyberterrorism, and computer viruses. In order to combat cybercrime the U.S. government passed the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) that allowed prosecutors to charge cybercriminals for their cybercrimes. Cybercrimes laws implemented by the CFAA should be strengthened in order to deter harmful cybercrimes because cybercrime has effect corporations, people, and the government.

The agencies employed by governments to police the web in order to protect the vulnerable have seen an increase in child pornography and online fraud. The speed at which information can be distributed and the number of people that can be reached attracts those that are intent on causing harm. The term “cybercrime” is becoming more widely used. The financial gains that can be made and the anonymity the internet can provide, make the virtual world of cyberspace a haven for criminals. Although the internet has huge benefits for information gathering and social networking, in the wrong hands it can cause harm to the vulnerable and criminals are able to vanish into the underground with the use of false identities that are hard to track online.

By way of illustration, advancements in recent years indicate that cyberspace in particular is becoming a viable theater of both international and political conflicts. Because of this, the possibility of widespread ambivalences - fought in cyberspace - continues to rise. And with digital warfare capabilities under current development, it is therefore necessary to understand two basic paramount political debates: Should there be an international treaty on cyberwarfare? And is it important to explain cyber warfare between states in the context of both domestic and international affairs; from a legal-political perspective? With that being said, cyberspace is everywhere (i.e. in today’s world) presenting significant implications for both global economic activity and also for international politics.

Every state in the nation should have a comprehensive IT security policy due to the “growing array of state and non-state actors are compromising, stealing, changing, or destroying information and could cause critical disruptions to U.S. systems” ("Cyberspace policy RevIew", 2016). Because of “ the dual challenge of maintaining an environment that promotes efficiency, innovation, economic prosperity, and free trade while also promoting safety, security, civil liberties, and privacy rights” ("Cyberspace policy RevIew", 2016). It is the responsibility of state and the federal government “ to address strategic vulnerabilities in cyberspace and ensure that the United States and the world realize the full potential of the information technology revolution” ("Cyberspace policy RevIew", 2016).