preview

Physician Assisted Suicide Argumentative Analysis

Decent Essays

Brittany Maynard was a twenty-nine year old woman who had been married for one year when she was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer. She accepted the fact that her illness was only going to cause her physical and emotional pain and never be cured. Maynard made it clear that she was not suicidal but wanted to have the option of ending her life on her own terms. Once the medication that would end her life was in her possession, she stated that it gave her a “tremendous sense of relief” in an article she wrote about her decision. Maynard ended her misery in the state of Oregon, where death with dignity is permitted. Terminally ill patients should be allowed to choose their own deaths because some suffering is unnecessary and it is their life so it is their choice. The reality is that today’s world is filled with anguish from untreatable diseases. Despite the rapid improvements of modern medicine, saving a person’s life or easing their pain is unlikely. The patients’ illnesses make their lives excruciating as they lose the hope of living a painless life. The act of painless killing to relieve another’s suffering is called euthanasia. …show more content…

People opposed to euthanasia may argue that physician assisted suicide is going against God. However, people shouldn’t lengthen the process of dying than what is absolutely necessary. In his article on euthanasia, Steve Seibold wrote, “If someone chooses to believe that God wants her to suffer through a terminal illness that's her decision, but when you force the rest of us to obey laws based on evidence-less beliefs, it’s wrong and needs to be stopped.” Others may possibly mention that life is sacred and euthanasia cheapens the value of life. On the other hand, all people, who are mentally capable of deciding, should have equal rights and opportunities to live, or to decide not to continue

Get Access