Pluralism In The United States

In a pluralist democracy like in the United States, interest groups have played a major role throughout the history through highly organized factions and are aimed at different levels of government. Lobbying is one of the tactics of the interest groups to aid their agenda through implementing new laws and regulations. "If you want to have your face in the light, you should have your back in the dark". Similarly, the influences of the interests groups and lobbyists have good and bad effects on the people and the society.

The end of World War II catalyzed the start of an age of political accord in the United States. This accord, dubbed the "liberal consensus," took shape with three core beliefs: first, that economic growth would solve all social problems; second, that Washington had an obligation to prevent the spread of communism; finally, that empowering marginalized groups would spur pluralism and maintain a healthy democracy. For almost two decades, the baby boom, the Red Scare, the early civil rights movement, and the Kennedy Presidency reinforced public support for the consensus. Yet the conflicts of the 1960s - the Vietnam War, widespread American poverty, and domestic racial tension - planted seeds of dissent.

Nowadays, racism, politics, and prejudices are the cause of boycotting, riots, and injured people lately, but racism is not the issue. We are constantly surrounded by several different types of race, skin color, and culture. Today, people do not pay attention if a person is different because we are all equal, but with different background and we are worth the same. We have all spoken to a person with a different heritage and shared several different priceless moment with at least of person who is different. Cultural pluralism is the best hope for a just and cohesive society.

Federalism is a political concept describing the practice whereby a group of members are bound together by a covenant. An advantage of federalism is that one person will not have too much power. So none of the branches can run with all the power, and what they say goes. Also it helps divide power between local, state, and federal governments. Everyone has to go through someone, also known as checks and balances, to get laws or other things passed. It also allow citizen to be involves in what is going in the country. All the power is not in one person’s hands, it is distributed to local representatives, and they give it to their citizens to vote. So citizens are aware of what is going on in government on the federal, state, and local levels.

In “Problems and Promise in Pluralism,” Annalee R. Ward argues for academic freedom through the lens of confessional pluralism. Ward challenges the academy to revisit pluralism to ascertain whether various denominations can have an “engagement of differences in creative ways” that allow for coexistence in scholarship” (Eck 9). Although academy insists that pluralism tugs on personal integrity, closer examination show that “authentic peaceful coexistence” is a possible outcome when approached correctly (Ward 5).

A major problem that many representative democracies had, and still have, is securing minorities rights within a system ruled by the majority of that country. This is when the term modern pluralism comes into light. Modern pluralism is the idea that having a large number of parties within a government will create more power in the system, which ensures that not a single group will contain total control.

Proposition 47 is an example of the pluralist discourse of the American politics. The decades of subsequently inferior sentencing policies led to a consensus among the public for social and political changes, which is Proposition 47 passed. It is reasonable to suggest, since, in the United States, we permit indirect representation certain issues are overlooked and prioritized over others. Therefore, Proposition 47 was initiated by the public interest in efforts to continue with prison reforms. The launching of the Proposition 47 campaigns led to citizen's direct involvement, which permitted a greater political impact because disadvantaged communities were highly targeted and mobilized to vote in the upcoming referendum (Smith 2014). Likewise,

Diversity exists all across the United States. It is defined as the state of having people who are different races or who have different cultures in a group or organization, according to Merriam-Webster dictionary. Along with the ever-growing diversity in America, brings along intercultural communication. Intercultural communication can be defined as a situated communication between individuals or groups of different linguistic and cultural origins. Due to the limitless amounts of diversity and intercultural communication across the United States, misunderstandings and clashes between cultures are bound to occur. These clashes have been as extreme to be used to explain violence and crime not only in the United States, but also throughout our entire nation. On the other end, these cultural clashes can be so personal in our everyday lives because of our expectations of a certain behavior coming from our own cultural backgrounds, as many others have very different cultural backgrounds and expectations of us.

Two-tiered pluralism differs from pluralism because of the effect it has upon the minority groups of the nation. While there is an equal legal backing for all racial and ethnic communities, minorities are still undermined by the system thus becoming segregated. Moreover in politics, minority groups tend to be under seclusion even though the current enacted laws grant equality at all stages. The amount of resources given to minorities are very different to elites leading to the practices and outcomes to be unequal (Lecture 6). Pluralism is very different from the two-tiered pluralism framework as it focuses upon group-based competition and that everyone has equal opportunities

Throughout the world social problems such as illiterate, elderly, handicapped, minority groups, and poverty have been the biggest part in our society for many years. Some of our social problems had died off, meanwhile, they’re still many problem that we are still facing as a society. One of the major social problem we face is people being illiterate. Being illiterate is meaning a person can not read nor write, and it can also mean that a person is grammatically incorrect. There is as much as 23% of the adult population that are ignorant to basic skills of the 4th grade level. In the U.S. the ethnic group that is most affected by not being able to read or write is

Majoritarian and Pluralist are both different kind of procedures for democratic government. Moajoritrian holds the power of the house of the repregentive and the sanete, where they make important discision as a republician. Pluralist is where most states, groups, prinicple and sources of authority make the dicision. I agree with the point that being said that both of the party groups are "malarkey", which is being mislead or impress". Becasue no matter how you look at boh of them, they have similarties of making money or making unemplymnet work with lower wages or higher. "The Democrats supported direct government spending on public works like roads and bridges, thus putting some of the unemployed immediately to work. Along with infrastructure

Politics is an integral part of our society, and in order for the citizens of any society, or a county to protect their rights and interest, electing the right people, and right theories are necessary. When it comes to government, Elitism and Pluralism are two systems which can be used as a structure of how the powers will be distributed. While the theory of Elitism prefers the distribution of power to be based on wealth, ancestry and intellect; Pluralism theory is much more diverse in the distribution of power, as it ensures equality for everyone, regardless of any differences. Pluralism serves as the model of modern western democracy. In the case of Baltimore, the pluralist theory is much more efficient due to its views on authority, rights

With the separation of powers it gives citizens a voice and makes our government liberal. By providing a check and balance system, it provides less power to the president which doesn’t allow the president to make up the laws as he wishes. The checks and balances provide the citizens to be able to check the effectiveness of the laws made and if someone finds any one law unfair can take actions against it. Therefore the system of checks and balances provides an easy flowing popular system. The Legislative, Executive and Judicial branch are what makes America government system different. It creates an equilibrium of

Wuthnow argues for a more pluralistic society. What does that mean exactly? The two major approaches towards exploring pluralism are by defining what pluralism is not and describing frames of mind taken to achieve pluralism. is Wuthnow, right from the start clears the air “Diversity and pluralism are not the same. Pluralism is the response to diversity.” Basically, what Wuthnow is saying that pluralism is either defined or destroyed about our response to diversity in our life (285). More so “true pluralism is not the same as tolerance” (304). Simply, tolerating people is not the same as acceptance. The primary place to start in regard to pluralism is coming to terms that all religions are attempts to reach what is sacred and that all paths

The term "federalism" describes the changing relationship between the national and state governments as they sort out their roles and responsibilities within the federal system. America has a decentralized government; there is no single source of power or center of government. Federalism goes well with pluralism, because of the multiple centers of power that exist in the government, and also the many divisions of power. There are several levels of government including the federal government, the 50 states, county and city governments and independent school districts. However, the major players are the national and state governments. The tensions between the two are clear when it comes to civil rights, money, and power.