Police Body Cameras Due to devastating events that have taken place between the police and civilians in 2015, law enforcements are finding it liable for policeman to be suited with body cameras. They believe doing so will begin to hold policeman more accountable for their actions, reduce police brutality and crime, as well as shedding light on the good cops still out here. One incident that proves cameras to be good evidence to police and their actions; would be the the case is which officer Michael Slager was proven guilty in the murder of Walter Scott because of the evidence from a video camera. “In South Carolina this week, protesters at North Charleston City Hall argued that, if not for bystander Feidin Santana’s video casting doubt on officer Michael Slagers version of events, he may not have quickly been charged with murder in the shooting of Walter Scott following a traffic dispute.”
Some detectives felt as if there was something suspicious about Slagers’ version of events at hand after their investigation. The following statement was made saying “when the cops story first came out, he said he was in a tussle,” said Virgil Delestine, a 28-year-old-fast-food woker.” But the video told what really happened.”
Two Other major happenings that is causing law enforcement to push for body cameras are the case in which the wake of a Staten Island grand jury’s decision to not indict Officer Pantaleo; For causing the death of Eric Garner who was restrained in a chokehold in
Body cameras can hold police officers accountable for their actions, both the good and the bad. “Continuously wearing body cameras would hold police accountable for their appropriate, and inappropriate, conduct” (Buam). Also when the citizens make accusations they could pull the video from the camera and see whether the police officer did what they said they did or not. “Video recorded by body cams protect any false accusations, misconduct, or abuse
Over the last few years there has been much controversy leading up to the need for law enforcement officers to wear body cameras. This is not only for citizens but also for the officers’ protection. With so much debate regarding police brutality and excessive force body cameras are quickly on the rise. New technology is giving police on a state and federal level a new opportunity to cut back on some of the allegations and negativity we have seen in the last few years. On the other hand it is giving citizens all over the country the safety they should feel when being approached by law enforcement. Our technology has improved significantly over the years and this seems to be something that will benefit everyone.
It was also found, that the officers were using excessive force. (Harvard Law Review N.A., 2015). Many people thought that if the police officer had been wearing a camera in the highly controversial case of Michael Brown, it would have given the grand jury more evidence regarding the confrontation between the police officer and him, prior to the fatal shooting of Michael Brown. (Harvard Law Review N.A., 2015).
Another advantage to law enforcement agents wearing body cameras is to document the contact made between the officer and the victim and/or suspect. This documentation can be used as evidence in
Body cameras in policing are still new, but more and more agencies are beginning to implement this technology into their line of work. At first police officers were very hesitant to wear these body cameras because they were afraid they would infringe themselves and give away their own privacy. Later, as body cameras were beginning to see more use in the work place, officers began to realize that these very own body cameras that they once thought would only cause themselves harm would actual prove to be useful in a variety of situations. Some of these situations can be citizen complaints, to even backing up an officers use of force. Body cameras can be the one sole thing that can give
Walter Scott’s shooting by a police officer in April 2015 defines the racism in the American policing from a new perspective. In the incident, 33-year-old American police officer Michael Slager shot Walter Scott eight times in the back when Scott tried to run away from him. Slager had asked Scott to pull over because of some issues in the taillight of the car. Slager claimed before the court that he had to take this action because Scott had taken away his taser, and he was afraid that Scott might be a threat to his own life. However, later evidence from Feidin Santana, a passerby, revealed to the media a video that Santana had shot at the time of this incident. In this video, it was evident that Slager and Scott indulged in a little brawl before Scott tried to run away. Slager had his taser intact because the video clarifies that while tackling the dead body of Scott, Slager was seen handling his taser - it was not in the victim 's hands. Slager was dismissed with immediate effect from his post, and he was accused of murder (Infobase). The injustice of Walter Scott 's death clearly demonstrates that it is crucial for all police officers to wear body cameras. Police officers in body cameras will prevent violence between officers and civilians, hold officers accountable for inappropriate behavior, and serve as on-hand evidence for future judicial actions.
Historically speaking, authorities of the law were never in a position where their professional duties and their character as a public servant of the law were demeaned in a way that there needs to be constant surveillance of them and the people whom they come into contact with. There was never a need of documenting every encounter you had with a civilian before. In this day in age, things have certainly changed, and the past has always been something society likes to change and make better even if it raises concerns. Due to all the violent police stories that has surfaced in the past decade, the idea of having police officers wear video cameras as a part of their uniform while on duty has resulted in a radically divergent account of society’s future. The law may uphold cops to wear cameras while working, but is this really the best decision? This topic is very controversial and may create issues with cops and the civilians they try and protect in the future.
The dispute of police body cameras truly hit the media hard this week. Blasting from the headlines all citizens were aware that Michael Brown was lethally shot in Ferguson, Missouri. This prompted officers to become fortified with body cameras. This technologically progressive world that we live in today has shaped a world of tweeting, posting and uploading. It’s about time that police departments take advantage of the tools accessible to them, especially with the advancement of equipment. The move forward in technology will help to alleviate speculation on any misconduct perpetrated. There now will be hard honest evidence of any crime committed against a police officer.
The United States criminal justice system has been having major issues with police brutality recently. According to The Washington Post, In 2015 alone almost one thousand people were shot and killed by the police. This statistic is staggering as it shows how much deadly force is being inflicted on the public. The police brutality is not only shootings as in many cases the police actions are justified in court, however, there has been recent outrage over police being overly aggressive and abusive towards the public; specifically with the African American community. This has sparked mass protest and in extreme cases riot have broken out. The public has become fed up with the police getting off with little to not punishment for their crimes due to most of the evidence being testimonies. Body cameras are the glaring solution to this problem. The give insight into what really happened during an altercation where there was an officer related shooting that left a young man dead. An example of this is a recent event in Baltimore saw a man arrested on drug charges and got held in jail for months. However the arresting officer was wearing a body camera. Police body cameras start to record for the previous thirty seconds prior to activation. When the footage was reviewed it saw the officer plant evidence at the scene to incriminate the suspect. This led to the release of the accused suspect and the officers are under review (Hendry, E. R., & Barajas, J., 2017, para. 4). Now if the arresting officer did not have that body camera an innocent man would be in jail on drug charges that he had nothing to do with. These are situations that could be happening more than the
The body camera has become a popular choice amongst police departments worldwide. The situation of the scenario, and if the officer or suspect acted in the right can be determined from past footage. The cause of the body camera has been the allegations against officers for how they acted in certain situations, as well as for how the suspect acted during the callout. The effect has been officers being terminated due to lack of integrity or situational awareness, as well as officer safety. Suspects have also been convicted of false accusations against a police officer, as well as crimes presented in court, from fights, to officer involved shootings. The body worn camera has benefited both police officers and the general public.
Due to the events in Ferguson Missouri that happened on August 9th 2014, a new controversy has swept the nation. The question seems to be, should American police officers be required to wear body cameras? A petition was started on the website “We the People” to instate a new law, called the "Mike Brown Law", that requires all police officers to wear body cameras. The petition has acquired over 150,000 signatures and a good deal of news coverage. If this law were to be put into fruition, it will help restore citizens’ faith in the police force. For another thing, citizens would no longer have to worry about the police using unnecessary force. On the other hand, this is not a punishment for police. It will also be helpful for the police when
Issues and Controversies find, “Police have repeatedly lied to the public about incidents of police brutality, body camera proponents contend, and video footage will provide evidence to hold rogue officers accountable” (Police Body Cameras). Body camera, can hold civilians and or police officers accountable for their actions, and since there is evidence, everything else does not matter. By having a body camera, is the best evidence anybody can take to court. The recorded video is worth more than a thousand words, meaning you can see it, and hear
On the afternoon of March 12, 2015 I responded to the call of shots fired and two people injured near the Ferguson, Mo, police headquarters. When I arrived I noticed to officers were laying on the ground, I called for EMT’S and backup. Then we sealed of the perimeter, so we can work to provide proper medical attention to the officer’s. Then we proceeded with the investigation. I then examined the crime scene looking for any evidence or clues I could find.
The familiarity of such cases is evidence to believe that one case or even many cases of the same caliber did not prompt the decision to fund police body cameras alone but a more influential reason can explain the decision for body cameras. A state of field assessment conducted by the police reform revealed that various forms of technology is being adapted or developed for law enforcement purposes, and there are many specific technologies, both current and emerging, that can benefit law enforcement. The theory that can best explain new emerging technologies that has power to influence political decisions can best be explained by the new media
Great post-Alethia. When I first became a police officer, the idea of wearing a body camera or having a camera in your squad was frown upon by most individuals in the law enforcement community. Officers did not appreciate the “big brother” feeling of a body worn camera. There was also the assumption that there was someone in a suit and tie or Internal Affairs second guessing how they did their jobs to appease the public. As the time grew closer for my department to begin implementing the body cameras, my personal opinion changed once I understood why we needed them and the benefits. As law enforcement officers faced more intense scrutiny for their positive and negative behaviors, in front of the public and against the citizens, the importance