Political Background Should be Mandatory before being allowed to run for President
Julissa Aguirre
Lamar High School
Argumentative
Abstract
Political background should be mandatory before being allowed to run for office to avoid as many problems in the future as possible. The following pages embody key points as to why including: experience, military affairs, and international affairs. The section of experience explains why it is important for a candidate to have political experience. The following section about military affairs explains what the President does when it comes to the military and how having a political background may impact decisions. The last section contains information on foreign affairs and how a candidate
…show more content…
President Ulysses S. Grant, for example, was elected into office after his success in the Civil War. After he was elected the American people hoped for an end to the turmoil but things only got worse. Because Grant had a lack of political experience, he was constantly looking to Congress for direction (whitehouse.gov). A visitor to the White House noted Grant as “a puzzled pathos, as of a man with a problem before him of which he does not understand the terms.” (whitehouse.gov). Because he depended on others, Grant became involved in what is known as “Black Friday”. Two men by the name of Jay Gould and James Fisk convinced President Grant to stop the marketing of gold, while discretely, they were both stockpiling gold. After successfully convincing Grant, both Gould and Fick earned a combined $60 million in gold (Andrew). The result of “Black Friday” affected the U.S. economy negatively for several years. Many problems can be produced under the leadership of a candidate who has not received the proper amount of political experience.
Military Affairs
The President is Commander-in-Chief of the United States armed forces. Therefore, if the President requests for the United States army to do something, they do it if possible. If a person with little political experience is given a large amount of responsibility they may abuse it. However, the Congress limits the power the President has. For example, if a President orders the army
Executive power is vested in the office of the President of the United States. The President has the dual role of being the chief of state and the head of government. The President is also commander in chief of the armed forces. He issues executive orders, and appoints Supreme Court justices (with senate approval). The president is also called "the chief legislator" because he indirectly proposes many bills, considers all bills from Congress and signs them into law or vetoes them.
Decisions that presidents had made previously with little congressional participation. Under Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof. Congress is granted responsibility for caring out their powers as well as all other powers in the Constitution. This gives them the constitutional right to establish certain procedural implements for war proceedings. Thus, the central purpose of the War Powers Resolutions to restrain the president from unilaterally deploying U.S. Armed Forces. Constant with this intent, legislation imposed the president to report and consult with congress. More notably, it provides congressional supervision by permitting congress to force troop
This paper looks at the question in reference to “Should the President Be Required to Have Served in the Military?” in reference to be allowed to why the candidates should serve the officer before being considered for president. It also looks at the point given by some who argue, the President Be Required to Have Served in the Military they believe it will help the citizens respect your opinions and authority more. The government may have reasons to why the President Be required to have served in the Military. This paper highlights why the President Be required to have served in the Military and the opposing side to that right.
Even though the authority of this field is split into three positions, the president, congress, and the senate. The president's position is dominant. The constitution designates him as the “Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States.” Leadership in foreign affairs must flow from the president or it will not flow at all. In times of peace he raises, trains, supervises, and deploys the forces that congress is willing to maintain.
The Constitution is supposed to divide war powers between the president and Congress, but in today’s society that has not always been the case. We live in a country with competing views, but our Constitution was created through disagreement. While the Constitution is a source of cherished and unifying political ideas, it can provoke some of the most intense quarrels because of its principles and protections. It is also debated and applied to present circumstances daily. To get back to the presidential power argument, President Barack Obama sent United States military into combat without the consent from Congress. “As a presidential candidate in 2007, Senator Obama stated, “The President does not have power under the constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation” (Yoo). President Barack Obama announced four years later, that he was acting on his constitutional authority to conduct U.S. foreign relations as the commander in chief/chief executive by the intervention with Libya. Throughout our history, neither presidents nor Congress have carried out the beliefs that the constitution requires a declaration of war before the U.S can allow for the military to act. “We have forced abroad more than 100 times but declared war in only five cases: The War of 1812, the
Document A: According to Article II of the Constitution, the President has the power to carry out the laws. He officially becomes commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states, allowing him/her to have control over them. The President is responsible for making sure the laws are enforced.
The U.S. President is the president of the U.S. military. He additionally manages each state civilian army if the local army is called vigorously for the United States. In spite of the fact that the President can go into arrangements with different countries, a settlement requires endorsement from the Senate. The President likewise makes assignments for judges of the U.S. Incomparable Court, and his arrangements are likewise subject to endorsement of the U.S. Senate. He likewise makes suggestions to Congress as to enactment that he trusts matters to the matter of the
The presidents have always played a crucial role in American politics and are known for their roles in unifying the nation. They are glorified for their charisma and ability to lead, but even these brilliant men make economic, political, and social blunders. Andrew Jackson, who was in office from 1829-1837, was a president of many firsts as he was the first frontier president, first to have a “kitchen cabinet”, and first to use a pocket veto. Jackson was later succeeded by his vice president, Martin Van Buren. Van Buren, who was in office from 1837-1841, was known for his shrewd political skills. Both these men laid down the foundations for a stronger, more centralized national government with methods that garnered mixed responses.
According to Article II, Section 2, Clause I of the Constitution, the President of the United States is commander in chief of the United States Armed Forces U.S. ranks have their roots in British military traditions, with the President possessing ultimate authority, but no "rank", maintaining a civilian status. What this means in Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, refers to the President as the “commander-in-chief of the army and navy of the United States.” What the founders meant by this clause was that once war was declared, it would then be the responsibility of the President, as the commander-in-chief, to direct the war. As with European monarchies, the position of the American president as the nominal head of the armed forces is deeply rooted in traditions going back centuries. However, there are limitations on the authority of the President and what he can and cannot do, such as he can make the decision on the amount of troops are on the ground and if and when the attack will began, but he cannot start a war without Congressional approval. A Declaration of War must be passed by congress before any war can began. This is a checks and balance system set up to keep one person from having too much power. And starting a war just because he does not like how things are going.
Grant did not have a perfect presidency. At times his cabinet seemed ineffective and corrupt, with multiple scandals plaguing his administration. Unfortunately, Grant followed Andrew Jackson’s spoils system, and implemented loyal friends into his cabinet rather than qualified advisors. As a result, Grant’s agenda often fell short because of a sluggish cabinet and government. Other political leaders highlighted this incompetence, but the American people still idolized the war hero. His popularity with the American people did not always translate to desired results, as represented in the Gold Panic of 1869. Grant’s foolhardy mistake of releasing millions of dollars of specie into the economy was met with unprecedented economic consequences. It was a huge blunder for him to unwittingly be a co-conspirer and then over correct his mistake. It didn’t help that four years later his administration was stagnate and useless during the global Panic of 1873. Grant’s inability to contain financial disasters and corrupt cabinet members are detrimental to the President’s
One of the scandals that happened during his presidency is know as Black Friday. Grant was trying to continue Andrew Johnson’s economic plan. Grant had wanted to back the US currency up with gold. So he would buy citizens money and replace it with a new currency backed by gold. (PBS.org/American Experince) At the time he was doing this two financers where scheaming a plan on how to get rich off of the stock market. The names of the two financiers where Jay Gould and Jim Fisk. They had planned on buying up as much gold as they could causing the price to go up in resale value. It was going well for them but they got affected a little by Grants decision on selling some of the
Article II, Section 2 of the US Constitution names the president as "Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States." It gives the President the sole constitutional power to engage in foreign aggression. By contrast, in Article I, Section 10, the Constitution prohibits states from "engag[ing] in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay" unless they have obtained the "Consent of Congress." No such limitation for the president about the expression of war. Article II lets the President have power over foreign relations, like the making of treaties and the appointment of ambassadors, but only with the consent of Congress. The constitution has no such check on military use. But, Congress does have the power to
1. The President of the United States, (POTUS), is the Commander in Chief of the military forces of the United States and of the state National Guard units when they are called into active service for the United States
The president also has the power of assigning the federal judges, and when to call Congress into session. Likewise, the president has the power to either sign or veto a piece of legislation from Congress.
The President executive branch, is the commander in chief so in turn has full control over the military. However the Congress legislative branch, controls the budget and grants the funds the president needs This way the Congress can limit the President by limiting funds, this goes to all agencies that the President control. The Congress also approves most of the nominations for president, , but the President may veto their legislation. The Congress can pass over the Presidents veto, however it would be the agencies controlled by the President that would imply and execute the laws created by Congress. This way every party has some means to work with the other and so cooperation and compromise is the only way for the government to operate.