Q&A: Running from Office Students spend a very tiny amount of their time paying attention to politics. It seems that other aspects of students’ lives take precedence over political issues. Students spend their most of their time “taking classes, hanging out with friends, working part-time jobs, and participating in extracurricular activities” (p.71). Specifically, this article states that young adults spend about three and a half hours a day with education, four hours hanging out or playing sports, and almost three hours working (p.72). The rest of the students’ time is spent doing essential activities like sleeping, eating, and grooming themselves (p.72). High school students go to school for a longer time, spend less time with sports …show more content…
Teenagers look up to their parents and teachers. Both groups “do not push [students] towards a future in politics” (p.77). Students are heavily influenced by their mentors, so if political engagement is not something that is promoted than students will not try to go into politics. Politics also does not interest the youth like the other activities they do on a daily basis. For example, school is something that children need to attend for the betterment of their future, and hanging out with friends or playing sports is something younger people just want to do. Political engagement is neither a want or a need for the younger generation. The youth do not want to because of the negativity of politics, and because of how broken they think the system is. Political engagement to younger people is to engage in a “constant stream of scandal, conflict, and failure” (p.87). The media constantly shows politics in a “negative and combative” manner, and this causes the younger generation to stray away because they do not want to constantly engrossed in something that only results in negativity. This is also the reason teenagers do not discuss politics around each other. It’s normal that teenagers do not want to talk about something that will only make people sad or spark an argument. Teenagers also believe the political system is broken and “ineffective” (p.88). This feeling stems from the
To begin with, teenagers below eighteen are generally not interested in politics comparing to adults. According to the results of the British Household Panel Survey in 1991 and 2001, "16 and 17 – year- olds are especially unlikely to report interest in politics" (2006, P. 543), and ”the 16 and 17-year-olds of 1991 actually became much more interested in politics when they turned 26 and 27, respectively, in 2001" (2006, P. 543). From the empirical data, Chan and Clayton draw the conclusion that adolescents have not yet fully developed political interest until their later years. (2006, P. 544) With the lack of interest in politics, teenagers in Canada will hardly vote in any elections. This makes youth enfranchisement a complete waste of time, effort and money. In addition, as teenagers tend to
Most of the children today don't know the politics that is surrounding us. Politics are a crucial part of how our society is formed. Without a proper understanding of it, young citizens are presumed to be disengaged and elect people based only on charisma or just the public's opinion , without taking in note of any possible party connection or social and political principles or manifesto. Making children aware of the political system and its diversity of political theories and beliefs even though they won't be taking action currently is very important if we want to live in a world where people know about the political situation in their
It is generally thought that young people mature and become more politically active. While this may have been true in the past, evidence is showing that this progression is not occurring in modern times. Most people make the assumption that once an individual is fully independent, paying taxes, and performing all of their civic duties, they would be more concerned about whom is governing them. For example, they would impose the question “What kind of laws are they passing or planning on passing?” However, this is not the case anymore. The modern day American is too absorbed in technological distractions to be bothered by the mundane aspects of the political world. Young people today are postmodern citizens – cynical, distracted, no longer possessed
Niemi (2011) makes the argument that there is a greater need for civics classes at an early age in order to increase political knowledge that students have in the future. The premise is that political attention and voting are habitual, and promoting these values at a young age may create a type of inertia that will carry out throughout their lives. In order to be successful, however, I would argue that simply presenting information about political events and actors would not be sufficient. Neimi makes the statement earlier that American students are struggling in mathematics and science, but then contents that simply adding more classes with have a positive effect on civics.
Unfortunately, younger people have other interests rather than politics.The least they want, is to have a responsability. They are happy having fun. For example, most students of highschool love to play video games and be online chatting with friends.The will not take the time to do a reaserch and choose a qualified candidate for the country.Thereby, most of them will not bother to go and vote.
Let’s face it, all dads talk about the latest football game, and all preschoolers talk about their newest toy. But teenagers don’t just talk about the next video game launch; they talk about politics.
Politicians Always promise things, whether it's to gain attention or just make the people hear what they want to hear. Some people have know idea about politics and when it's time to vote they always go with the side who has the most votes. kids who just turned eighteen have little interest in politics, they barely vote and could care less who is picked as president. If you gather up 10 teenagers at the age of eighteen through 21, maybe one person out of that whole group has voted for a president. There's a lot of reasons why teens would have little interest in voting. It could be the technology that everyones addicted to, or not having to much knowledge about their government, and another thing is that people say they have no time to vote. Most people who work from sunrise to sunset always come home tired and they just don't have the energy to vote. These
Arvanitakis & Marren’s (2009) discussion paper focuses on the concept of the participation of Australian youth in politics. I thought this article addressed some of the prominent perceptions surrounding adolescents of the 21st century. Lina (year) stated that “young people are already active – just in ways not always understood” (Arvanitakis & Marren’s 2009, p. 6). I believe this is an accurate statement regarding the participation of Australian youth, as their engagement
Throughout the years the general population has become detached from each other, thus creating a civic engagement gap that has been seen to affect the youth over other age groups. In Gen.com:Youth, Civic Engagement, and the New Information Environment, Michael X. Delli Carpini Professor of Communication analyzes the current decline in civic engagement among youth. Carpini examines the possible origins of this growing problem and additionally provides the audience with an innovative yet unrealistic solution.
When holding a survey on a website, “The Student Room Group”, found that just twenty-one percent of students say that the age should be changed to sixteen. This means that just under four out of every five students think the age should stay the same. Students that are for changing the age could possibly know what they are talking about. Even though it isn’t a cool thing or a common hobby to know as a teenager, politics is a very good mechanism to learn in your life. Politics is complex in the ideas that the separate parties believe in. Politics is very important to learn and use in your lifetime, but that
In our democratic system, the family has the strongest partisan attitudes. While a citizen is at school, citizenship and democratic norms are learned. We need these norms to better understand of what it means to be a active citizens, while living in a democracy. Some studies have shown that “open classroom” discussion lead to the youth to be more tolerant about issues (Socialization, 7). So, democracy does depend on citizen in school to be more knowledgeable. Being in college also lets someone be more open-minded. Another study showed the difference between youth’s attending college and youth’s not attending college. When it comes to registered to vote, liberal, 9/11 made them mistrust the government, attending a political rally, being involved in politics is an honor, approving abortion for any reason and allowing antireligionist to teach in college, we see people going to college on these issues with a higher score than people not in college (Socialization, Slide 12). Noncollege people scored high on disapproving Bush’s immigration policy, favoring school prayer and women are not suited for politics. According to this study, people in college like to be involved in politics, because it’s an honor for them to be in it. They also are more engaged in attending a politically rally as the results show. Therefore, as we go on through schooling, we gain more knowledge of politics. We also engage in political
We could witness students become more involved with political issues and form groups to address them. Since this change would only apply to high school students and young adults who may have already graduated, there should be no worry about these people being ill informed. But, look forward to the encouragement of voting by their schools. This would overall lead to our voting system becoming more flexible and could lead to a higher voter turnout for young adults. Those who are politically aware should not have to be held back by those who are not. “Voting is a right, not a privilege you're extended on the condition that you use it ‘responsibly.’(Johnston 2016) Yes, some kids would surely choose not to vote, but many of their parents don't either”. It takes effort to vote. Some
This growing trend of non-civic education for American children can be disastrous for the future. Correspondingly, with a lack in civic education many young Americans are losing interest in politics and their civic duties. This disinterest will equal low voter turn-out for future generations and elections. If the American people do not turn out to vote in future elections, then the democratic process will cease to exist within the United States all due to a lack of civic education in American youth. With the current state of education in the United States it is forming a large amount of college graduates as well who are ignorant to the political world. Pennlive wrote an article in 2016 consolidating, studies that indicated recent college graduates do not have the correct knowledge about American politics and
Like eligible registrants in the current system, those who are the most inclined to vote are those who are well informed on public policy and demonstrate an interest in contributing to their community. Supporters of this idea predict that the teens who are most likely to vote come from “politically active homes and are thus likely to amplify the power of an already well-represented group.” I believe that even students who don’t come from politically active homes are equally as capable of making well-informed decisions on public policy based on their own personal
Low youth participation in New Zealand’s political system has become a leading policy problem as enrolment rates have fallen over the last three general elections in younger age groups. This trend highlights the challenge our government must confront to ensure a fair representation of the total population in political decision making. Only through the implementation of youth engagement strategies may New Zealand’s government increase future political youth involvement. This essay will examine the topic of low youth engagement, analyse its causes and discuss three policy solutions. In evaluating these strategies, this essay will outline how these policies may be measured effectively.