Politics And The United States Essay

The United States is in the midst of a major debate over immigrants and their place in our economic and political life. As during other times in our history, immigrants, are being blamed for causing or contributing to the social, economic and political ills of our society. Politicians from both major parties, at both the national and state levels, are promoting a range of punitive legislative proposals that single out immigrants for adverse treatment by the government. Many violate basic civil liberties principles.

Changing political tides in the United States of America have inspired a more divisive and heated conversation about immigration policy, specifically addressing the southern border. One approach to the topic at hand accounts for the possible economic effects of an influx in human capital. While this perspective is no doubt important, understanding the individual human experience of immigrating from or through Mexico and across the border provides important context. As migrants move north through Mexico, a common familiarity with systematic abuse at the hands of gangs, officials and locals looking to make a quick buck can be documented. The border represents something intangible that brings new challenges and risks, from avoiding narcotics traffickers and Border Patrol agents to having a place to go once across. Arriving in the United States presents a frequent reality for the undocumented involving the abandonment of identity, acceptance of demoralization via a narrow bandwidth of job opportunities, and, for some, the freedom to have agency in one’s own story. The lives of migrants are filled with sometimes different yet all the while common hardships and the pursuit of a better tomorrow. Understanding a small selection of these perspectives will hopefully provide more complete insight into how and why people race towards the border, ultimately allowing policy decisions to truly be comprehensively informed.

In the Atlantic Article called the “Obama Doctrine”, the author Jeffery Goldberg says “Obama is gambling that he will be judged well for the things he didn’t do” (Goldberg). I am analyzing my own work, an essay I called “Keeping a Distance” which is an analytical essay that argues the successes of president Obama’s foreign policy. This essay was written in May 2016 for my Honors Comparative and Global Politics course at the Latin School of Chicago. In my essay I strived to persuade Americans that Obama’s Foreign policy was overall very successful. To assist me in my goal, I used Logos and Pathos to gain the trust and emotions of my audience. In my essay “Keeping a Distance” I successfully use Logos and Pathos to persuade my audience so that they would become supporters of my argument.

Politics are a noticeably controversial and complex topic of discussion for the majority of the American people. The political opinions of the American people are ultimately developed by their collective culture, lifestyle and political ideology. The majority of the American people are undeniably influenced and informed, directly and indirectly, by multiple sources of media on a daily basis. In this day and age, technology has allowed national political news to spread throughout the country virtually immediately via the internet, television, and radio. Many people might believe that popular news companies share and release politically biased information to the public with intentions to directly persuade the citizen’s opinions. The politically shared values and opinions of the American citizens strongly influence the executive decisions made within the United States government. Although, people that share conservative values believe that most news companies have a liberal bias, on the controversy, most people that share liberal values believe that most news companies have a conservative bias. This being said, all media released to the public, inevitably shares some kind of political bias and opinion that contains qualities of an opposing party.

Bigger government does not necessarily translate into a better government; since a better government is all about better policies and practices that the state employs. Therefore a bigger government is not a better government.

On March 15, 2011 a civil war began in the nation of Syria. Thousands of civilians stood up in protest to the government of Syria led by Bashar al-Assad. These protests began peaceful but quickly turned violent. These protesters demanded democratic reforms, release of political prisoners, an increase in freedoms, abolition of the emergency law and an end to corruption. This quickly escalated into hundreds of thousands of people taking to the streets in protest against the government. By 2013, nearly one-hundred thousand lives had been taken by this conflict and that number had risen to a quarter of a million by 2015 (Sharnoff). As this war has raged on, the Syrian government’s allies have grown impatient. Russia is Syria’s largest and most powerful ally has grown concerned over this war as Syria has been important to Russia in many ways over the years. Ideologies brought these two nations together in the mid-twentieth century and the relationship has progressed into a strong alliance.

These particular significant issues happened to me on my arrival in the United States of America. It was Monday afternoon when I landed in the airport of Atlanta Georgia holding my bag and name tag which identified me as new immigrant given by International Organization for immigration. Having anxiety of being lost and tired from the long hours of flight, I had a mixed feelings and thought about the new country I landed on. The land I entrusted my whole life was a land I only heard and read and taught in my middle school geography class, but not ever stepped into its soil. United State is a country where a lot of people dream about. however, they are significant issues of social disparities taking place within the country that includes high number of homelessness, health care disparities and high unemployment rate.

There are many important decisions made every day in this country. Most Americans do not know about half of these decisions. There is no need for the average adult to know all the decisions that happen every day because he can not be trusted to make the majority of the decisions. However, there are certain aspects of life where the average man is worthy of making decisions for himself. Economically, the average man can make educated decisions because it directly involves his immediate environment. In politics, the majority of decisions are made for the average man because he is not educated enough about national issues. The average man is not stupid. However, he doesn’t have a good enough grasp on national

Every two to four years, politicians aspire to demonstrate their competency for political office. Political campaigns and organizations concentrate millions of dollars to undercut and outlast the opposition. They drag names through the mud, as if it were the next step on the political “corporate ladder.” The American people, caught in the middle, are torn between the need for elected officials and the heartbreak of countless shattered oaths. Consequently, they dissociate themselves from misused words like Democrat, Republican, and change. They have learned to bite their tongue, drink their beer and leave well enough alone. That’s exactly what the politicians want.

Since the Syria violence begun, many lives have been lost. Thousands more have been displaced from their homes and country. Fighting between the government army and rebels has led to allegations that the Syrian government was using chemical weapons to attack in Damascus. These tensions have fuelled gossip of US-led military intervention.

Question – Britain’s foreign policy is not always as ethical as it claims to be. Discuss

Just looking the news today in twenty seventeen it is very easy to see that the state of American politics is distressing to say the least. Polarization and extremism is quickly becoming the norm. American parties are each going farther and farther to the left and right. Moderates are disappearing at an alarming rate. Senators and Representatives working across the aisle has mostly become a thing of the past. Government officials have become heavily tied to the party line without thinking about the good of the country as the whole. The foundational principle of compromise has been replaced with obstruction. Parties would much rather block anything the other party wants to get done rather than working out a possible deal. In recent years

Dustin: That's great and then if you look at like nine years from now and you're leaving that legislature what else is different? It might be on specific issues or what's different about the system or what else is there because you stood up and you were counted this is now the way Colorado politics is?

the cases of both the British and American legislature, a bi-cameral system is in place to

It seems that politics and funding defiantly play a part in the courts decision to send someone to prison. In the state of Ohio, it costs tax payers “$25,814” per inmate per year and while I could not find any exact cost of diversion programs (Vera.org). It is fair to assume they are much cheaper per person per year than sending them to prison. So it is easy to see why from a funding perspective, the state would prefer to move to more rehabilitate approach when dealing with drug offenses. While funding and politics do indeed play a factor in a courts sentencing, it is important to look at the people the court is sentencing and how they got there.