preview

Postmodernism In The Things They Carried

Decent Essays

Postmodernism is a style of writing which is still used often today. It is a response to modernism because postmodernism questions the norm. Essentially, postmodernism use is being used because everything else has been taken, so by blending in certain creations together, you can make something new. In postmodernism, authors like Tim O’Brien, who wrote The Things They Carried and A Heartbreaking Work of a Staggering Genius by Dave Eggers, both authors are telling the reader a story in the first person with stream of conscious, just like a modernist writer would do. However, the two authors, similarly, are unreliable at points in the books because they both change the meaning of their own true stories and admit to tricking the reader multiple …show more content…

However, O’Brien did not leave his comments out of the book. In the Chapter “How to tell a true war story”, O'Brien is about to tell one of his real war stories after he just told us a fictionalized story by Mitchell Sanders. O’Brien says, “This one does it for me. I've told it before—many times, many versions—but here's what actually happened” (74). He begins to describe what he and his fellow soldiers did to a baby buffalo, and it was awful. They brutalized the poor buffalo until it died. The story would make any person upset, if it actually happened. After O’Brien explains what they do to the animal and a few more gruesome stories he says, “None of it happened. None of it” (81). All the stories O’Brien just told us were made up. Everyone knows the clique that “war is hell” and most people would have believed the stories he just told us, if they were true. By saying that there was no Mitchell Sanders or buffalo, the whole chapter seems to mean less to the reader because it did not happen. Also, it makes the reader upset with the author for making something that did not happen seem true. Another passage which shows how O’Brien is an unreliable narrator is during the chapter called “Good Form”. Previous to this chapter, O’Brien has just told the reader, in vivid detail, …show more content…

As Dave is describing his mother’s stomach he says, “I don’t ask questions. Before, when I said that I asked questions, I lied” (12). Although this is a small detail in the book, Eggers feels as if he has to lie to convince the reader that this is a true story. By saying that he lied at the end, it is a postmodernist idea because you are not supposed to say whether you lied or not in your story. By telling the reader that he doesn’t ask questions, his trust level drops in the mind of the readers. Another spot in the memoir in which Eggers stretches the truth is when he is talking about his father. Although Eggers father died before his mother did, he switches up the chronological order by blending in the two dying parents together. After Dave, Beth, Toph, and the mom are about to go to the hospital, Eggers dimensions the death of his father by saying, “You should have seen my father’s service” (33). From talking about his dying mother to his dead father, Eggers blends the two moments together because that is the way he felt about them as he was writing this memoir. Although he can tell the story as he would like to, by moving the story into different parts, it can become confusing for the reader and cause some belief to decrease in Eggers story on how everything

Get Access