Part1 Precious Metals ability Precious Metals Price Soybeans ability Soybeans Price China 100 40 1 5 U.S. 1 40 500 5 (1) According to this case China can product 100 kilos of precious metals and 1 kills of soybeans per day and the U.S. can produce 1 kilo of Precious Metals and 500 kilos of soybeans per day. We can easily calculate that the opportunity cost for China to only produce 1 kilo precious metals is 1/100=0.01 kilo of soybeans. The U.S.’s opportunity cost for only product 1 kilo precious metals is 500/1=500 kilos of soybeans per kilo. Compare with these two number we can see there is a huge difference between China and the U.S.’s cost for producing precious metals, which is 500/0.01=50000 times. In another word, China have a much lower cost for them to produce the precious metals than the U.S. Using the same method, we can know that the cost of producing 1 kilo soybeans in China equal to 100/1=100 kilos of precious metals. However, in the U.S. it only cost them 1/500=0.002 kilo of precious metals to produce one kilo of soybeans; it means the U.S. has a much lower cost for them to produce the soybeans than China. i. According to the analysis provided above, we can know that China has a much lower cost to produce the precious metals and a super high cost for them to grow soybeans. It is better for China to focus on produce the precious metals instead of growing soybeans. That is why China should buy soybeans from the country that have a lower cost to growing them,
Some costs are expensive: freight cost from China, inventory (lead-time increase because of shipping), and quality control (testing shipped products from China in the US require some cost; time and money)
Aluminium is one of the newest metals to be found only discovered in the 19th century with developments in chemistry and electricity. The late discovery compared to other commonly used metals is due to the fact aluminium does not occur naturally in its purest form. Because of this aluminium was very rare making it a precious metal valued more than gold. Nowadays aluminium is the most abundant metal elements on earth consisting of 8% of the earth’s crust. About 41 million tons is smelted each year and therefore is used in a wide range of applications. From auto bodies to food and beverage storage eg: soda cans as well as electrical cables to aircraft skins, aluminium is a very big part of our everyday lives.
1. Country A is extremely efficient in the mining of tin. However, its climate and terrain makes it difficult to produce corn. According to the theory of comparative advantage, Country A should:
As most already know, the Swiss are renowned for their production of high quality chocolates including those of the Toblerone and Lindt brands. “Switzerland has a comparative advantage in the production of chocolate. By spending one hour producing two pounds of chocolate, it gives up producing one pound of cheese, whereas, if it spends that hour producing cheese, it gives up two pounds of chocolate. Thus, the good in which comparative advantage is held is the good that the country produces most efficiently (chocolate). Therefore, if given a choice between producing two goods (or services), a country will make the most efficient use of its resources by producing the good with the lowest opportunity cost, the good in which it holds the comparative advantage, and by trading for the other good.” (Globalization101.org, 2010)
1. Suppose that there are two states that do not trade: Iowa and Nebraska. Each state produces the same two goods: corn and wheat. For Iowa the opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of wheat is 3 bushels of corn. For Nebraska the opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of corn is 3 bushels of wheat. Present production is:
As a result, their businesses may have a difficult time competing with those particular products made in China. If they match China’s prices, the domestic businesses may have minimal profit at best. Consumers would benefit from the import surplus due to having more choices in the market and allowing for a lower overhead by buying cheaper electrical machinery products.
5. Country A has 56,000 units of labor and can produce 2 goods, manufactures and food. A’s producers take 7 units of labor to produce one unit of
This simply shows the generality that as a product goes through production and is further refined, the time and money that is spent on it increases its price. Because of this the profits of the industry cannot be analyzed because more than 50% of the products are intermediates to be used in another product’s production. To properly asses the state of the industry’s trade would required crossing over to other industries to the point where the product is actually complete and ready for consumer use. This is neither a good or bad thing as it is simply an exchange
This case is similar in many ways to some other cases I studied before on another program. One example is the Spin Master company case, which described their effort to find a Chinese manufacturer to manufacture their latest product. Two things I remember about this case was cost and production capacity. The cost table provided by one the suppliers was questionable, because it showed a much lower figure
Before performing the calculations, I would have thought that a specialist producer of parts, in this case the Japanese company, would, before transport costs are considered, be able to produce the components at a cost less than ourselves. The product is not particularly labor intensive to build. If it was, we would be looking to outsource production to a country with a lower cost of labor. The principle cost of production is materials cost. A specialty producer should be able to purchase materials at a cheaper price than Boeing as they are presumably making more products for other customers. Further, they should already have equipment in place and have a labor force that does not need to go through the leaning curve to become efficient.
Another challenge is that despite the ability to manufacture products cheaper in China, there is a flip side to this situation and that is that sometimes, that “made in America” sign on the back of a product could mean more than the few dollars more it costs to buy that product. Some Americans, in their spirit of patriotism, care more about supporting the American economy than saving a little bit here and there buying products that were manufactured outside of the United States. Balancing the stigma sometimes associated with making a product in a foreign country with the lower costs that usually comes along with that is important in doing business in China as well.
As the world’s 3rd largest economy, India is an important trade and economic partner for the United States(Martin, Akhtar , Kronstadt , Kumar ,Siskin,2014).There are many resources which are traded between India and United States. This trade may be due to differences between in labour productivity, factor abundance or other factors.example of products traded between India and US include precious stones and metals,aircraft and spacecraft parts,machinery,optical instrument and equipment,textiles,mineral fuel and oil and machinery(Singh,Verma,2016).This trade is due to a fact called comparative advantage which means if countries specialise in producing goods where they have a lower opportunity cost then there will be an increase in economic
China exported 5564700 tons of steels to Korea, down 60.10% year on year. The proportion to total steel export volume was 22.62%m down 0.94% compared with 2008 (Cheng, 2009). In 2009, among top 10 countries to which China exported steels, the ranking of Vietnam, India, Thailand and Singapore ascended, compared with 2008. America and United Arab Emirates with sharp rise in the export volume fell to the 4th place and the 9th place in 2009 from the 2nd place and the 5th place in 2008. Indonesia and Iran decreased by 7.89% compared with 2008, due to small year-on-year decline range of export volume (Huan, 2014).
Trade Barriers: High tariffs are still maintained on exported products that compete with domestic industries in China (Office of United States Trade Reprehensive) . China’s tax regulations are into conformance with international standards (Parliament of Australia Senate) . Therefore at present, cut flower exports to China carry a 70 percent import tax, including cost of transport, plus a value-added tax of 17 percent (Richard Tomlinson, 1995) .