preview

Propaganda In Mesch's Art And Politics: A Small History Of Art

Decent Essays

Propaganda is an easy trap to fall into when you are attempting to do something more than entertain or simply lay your personal feelings bare for an audience. The propagandist isn’t interested in exploring an issue in a dialogical fashion, but only seeks to sermonize or indoctrinate an audience with a very specific viewpoint. Even if that viewpoint is correct, the method of hammering home a given message discourages dialogue, conversation and the audience/artists/activist reciprocity discussed by Carter. Fear of propagandizing causes many artists to avoid producing work that could be interpreted as political or contains too clear a message. Just because some artists cross over into propaganda doesn’t mean that one should be afraid of producing meaning art. Since propaganda doesn’t allow for dialogue or conversation, a solution that falls into this practice would not be desirable. …show more content…

Mesch applies an art history lens to tease out key instances in World History where art and social change intersect. A poignant part of her work explores German painters known as Diebrücke (The Bridge). This group contained expressionist painters, most notably Ernst Ludwig Kirchner. Mesch specifically identifies that in this group’s reinvestigation of the homoerotic nude, Diebrüke challenged viewers to see the male body as sexual and erotic rather than patriarchal and authoritative (Mesch, 2013, p.134 – 136). The audience is invited to emote alongside the queer artists. They are asked to recognize and identify with the artist’s experience – whether the audience member is gay or

Get Access