Proposed School Change

There are five stages to help implement a school-wide change. The first is “becoming informed” and this is the stage that centers on research and information gathering. The goal of the principal is to educate him/herself as much as possible so that he/she can better understand the benefits, concerns, and effectiveness of trying a new program in the building. This is also when any testing or screening would need to happen so that the principal can get a clearer picture of the needs within the school based on the current student population. The second stage is “building support” which is just as the name suggests. The goal of the administrator is to build support for the new changes and to have faculty buy-in so that teachers and staff members are motivated to make the change. Furthermore, this is a key time for the administrator to act as a leader and model so that he/she may inspire others to act and make positive choices in regards to the program. The next phase is “creating an action plan” which is usually with a small group of people hand selected by the administration. This group figures out the nuts and bolts of bringing the change into the school by looking at the schools readiness for such a program, funding, and gaining commitment from the staff. Also during this time, the administrator is setting goals, problem-solving, and finding ways to delegate and support those working on the plan. The fourth phase is “implementing the plan” and may seem like a time

from these students it will cause their studying abilities to be taken away due to lack of focus. It

In the article "Why Focusing Too Narrowly in College Could Backfire," writer Peter Cappelli argues that while specializing in post-secondary school is beneficial and could possibly lead to a future career that is currently trending, parents and students should look into broadening their skills by taking courses that widen their communication, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. This may enable them to work where there are prevailing industries.

Ms. Diehl says, “Less bad behavior and better grades for some kids”.(“Should Schools Offer More Electives?”) Students will keep their grades up because if they don't, they will be kicked off of their team or activity. Others say that, it raises their grades if they are not apart of any activities. The students just have to be able to stay focused on the right things. My evidence supports my claim because it tell you the causes and effects of your grades. The evidence supports my overall claim because, this backs up my reasons. This is important because,these kids need to know the importance of keeping our grades up.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all students will have the opportunity to work much harder and it will be easier for the students to retain the information. This will improve their grades significantly. All we are asking is just to cut the workload just a little bit. If this were to happen students will have better health and will be ready

Students will have more time in class to ask the teacher questions regarding the particular topic they are writing about. They will receive better grades on papers because they have more time for student-teacher interaction, “Student's grade-point averages increased in almost all subjects”(Chaika). In addition to the students, an Advanced Composition teacher would have only three classes to teach in a semester, reducing the number of students taught regularly. The teacher has more planning time to organize a solid lesson. “Teachers have fewer preparations and more planning time. They teach three classes of 90 minutes and plan for one 90 minute period, therefore, 25% of their time can be devoted to planning”(Advantages). The learning process is greater for both students and teachers.

Students can focus more on school instead of working all the time to make money.

As the world becomes more specialized it raises the question, should undergraduate institutions change their curriculum requirements to better equip students? The goal of a liberal arts education is to enlighten individuals and prepare them for the complex and diverse world by requiring the study of literature, philosophy, mathematics, and sciences. As professional careers evolve into more specialized fields the argument that a liberal education is no longer needed rises. Some educators feel that future professionals would be better primed for the future by focusing specifically on subjects that deal with their intended field. However, a liberal arts education provides benefits that go beyond the classroom. The experience of studying a

College does not provide the correct curriculum needed to successfully advance in certain occupation that are not taught by the conventional methods in the classroom and are not taught in the period that

It would be great for every student to know what they wanted to do when they graduate. The answer to this is offering more specified electives. Students would be more involved and further progressed if they could pick what they

One of the pros that affects students most is fewer failing grades. This is a direct result of the extra time that is left over for teacher-student interaction. More help from the teacher results in stronger relationships and resulting in less dropouts. For instance, for classes like chemistry and biology there is more time for students to complete labs and activities. Better labs and activities are a result of the extra day teachers have to prep on the days they do not teach that particular class. One of the hardest Obstacles for high school students is to manage their schoolwork, job , and athletics if they participate in them. This schedule format helps them do just that; therefore, the students will have more time after they are done with their classes to relax before continuing with their days. The pros discussed in this paragraph defend the ideology that surrounds block scheduling.

School systems should revamp their current methods with a few basic points from each approach that can be easily assimilated into their schools’ models, create an atmosphere of motivation, engagement, and self-efficacy, as well as giving students alternative options than the standard college path.

It’s important to take all that anyone can get out of your studies toward your career, but not information that isn’t need to do their job. So in that case the fact that general education isn’t needed in most jobs today, if there is anything they do not know they have the ability to pull a out a phone from their pockets and Google anything they need. Google can not teach anyone how to be a doctor, mechanic, dentist, surgeon, etc. but it can teach anyone the basics of life. For which I have presented this alone should be enough for the curriculum to be lightened to just the classes of which their major inclines them to take. This could shorten the time period it takes to graduate, and the cost of school would be cheaper. By taking general education out of the way they can proceed to take more classes about your major in which case could cause students to graduate in under 4 years, it could possibly bring it down to 2 years if you’re

Creating smaller class sizes may appear to result in higher state expenses. Although this is true, the state actually benefits in the long run by the increase of college enrollments. “Research shows that students in smaller classes perform better in all subjects and on all assessments when compared to their peers in larger classes” ( “Why Class Size Matters Today”). This quote is significant because it proves that being in a smaller class helps students improve academically when being compared to a larger class size. Being in a smaller class helps students interact with their teacher, receive more attention from their teacher, and engage with others.

Worldwide, education, specifically in high schools, varies depending on the location. Some schools focus on a vocational education, which helps students learn in relation to a particular career, while others may focus on liberal arts, which emphasizes the importance of core subjects. Each has their own unique pros and cons, but a vocational education proves to be more effective in preparing students for the future, providing them with more opportunities, hands on experiences, and a direct path to the career of their choice.